Detection of plasma cells, C4d deposits and donor-specific antibodies on sequential graft biopsies of renal transplant recipients with chronic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: In order to look for a relationship between humoral mechanisms of rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction, plasma cells, C4d deposits and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were simultaneously sought on serial biopsies of kidney allograft recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten recipients with chronic dysfunction (G1) and 8 recipients with long-term normal graft function (G2) were included. Biopsies and serums were sampled at early graft dysfunction (T1), between 8months and 2years (T2) and after the third year following transplantation (T3). RESULTS: In G1, plasma cells represented 12.3% (T1), 8.2% (T2) and 14.1% (T3) of mononuclear cells. The mean percentage of plasma cells was 11.6% in G1 versus 0.4% in G2 (p<0.05). A progressive rise in C4d deposits was seen in G1, from 25% at T1 to 80% at T3. Donor-specific antibodies were identified in at least one serum sample of 60% of the patients in G1 and 12.5% of the patients in G2 (p=0.012), whereas donor-specific antibodies were eluted from at least one biopsy of 50% of the patients in G1 and 12.5% of the patients in G2 (p=0.03). In G1, C4d deposits were significantly associated with plasma cells (p=0.0012) and anti-HLA Abs in serum samples and/or eluates (p=0.026). CONCLUSION: This study shows that plasma cells, DSA and C4d are associated in renal transplants developing chronic rejection.

Distribution of donor-specific antibodies in the cortex and the medulla of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that donor-specific HLA antibodies should be more frequently found onto the transplant itself than in the bloodstream. It is now possible to detect such antibodies in kidney transplant needle biopsy samples by flow cytometry. In order to know if the detection of antibodies into such blind biopsy samples depends of the site of the biopsy, we have studied the distribution of antibodies in both the cortex and medulla of 12 transplants removed after graft loss due to chronic allograft nephropathy, and in 10 controls. METHODS: Donor-specific HLA antibodies were extracted from the cortex and the medulla of each removed transplant by an acid elution and characterized by Luminex assays. RESULTS: They were found in 58.3% of transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy and never in other kidney samples. The same antibodies were found in the bloodstream at the time of transplantectomy in only 16.6% of the recipients. The distribution between the cortex and medulla was concordant in 75% of cases. However, we observed 2 discrepancies: one in favor of the cortex and one in favor of the medulla. A majority (5/7) transplants with CAN and intra-graft donor-specific antibodies had also C4d deposits along peritubular capillaries. CONCLUSION: Testing for donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant needle biopsies can be of value provided the biopsy includes both the cortex and the medulla.

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies with flow cytometry in needle core biopsies of renal transplants recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy.

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from needle core biopsies of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy. Two methods of screening, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry (FlowPRA) were compared. Twenty renal transplants with CAN were removed after irreversible graft failure. To assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in small samples, needle core biopsies were sampled at the same place as surgical samples and at a second cortical area. Antibodies were eluted with an acid elution kit and anti-class I and class II IgG HLA antibodies detected using ELISA and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was found to be more sensitive than ELISA for detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from renal transplants with CAN (95% vs. 75% of positive cases). Detection of anti-HLA antibodies showed good agreement between surgical samples and needle core biopsies performed at the same place for anti-class I (80% vs. 65%, r=0.724 P<0.01) and anti-class II HLA antibodies (70% vs. 55%, r=0.827 P<0.01). In addition, differences in the detection of anti-class I HLA antibodies in needle core biopsies sampled at different sites suggests that immunization to class I donor antigen could be underestimated in needle core biopsy samples. These data indicate that anti-HLA antibodies can be detected in needle core biopsies from renal transplants. Provided further evaluation is done, elution might be a complementary method to detect anti-HLA antibodies when they are bound to the transplant.