ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the sealing ability of Roth 801 sealer mixed using two different powder/liquid ratios and prepared up to seven days prior to canal obturation. STUDY DESIGN: Of the 152 maxillary anterior teeth endodontically instrumented for this study, 144 were randomly assigned to the treatment group, and eight were assigned to the control group. Of the 144 teeth in the treatment group, 72 were obturated using gutta-percha and Roth 801 sealer mixed with a 10:1 ratio, while the remaining 72 were obturated with a sealer ratio of 7.5:1. Within both treatment groups, the teeth were further subdivided into six groups of 12 teeth based upon the amount of time between sealer mixing and canal obturation, which varied from 0 days to seven days. Teeth were analyzed with fluid filtration either immediately after obturation or 14 weeks after obturation. The data were analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: For teeth tested at the time of obturation, leakage decreased for older sealer, p < 0.0001. After the 14-week storage period, there was no significant difference in leakage. No significant differences were noted between either powder/liquid ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-mixed Roth 801 sealer maintained an apical seal when prepared up to seven days prior to canal obturation. Varying the powder/liquid ratio of Roth 801 sealer did not significantly affect the apical seal.
Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/chemistry , Dental Leakage/classification , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Eugenol/chemistry , Filtration , Gutta-Percha/chemistry , Humans , Humidity , Incisor/anatomy & histology , Materials Testing , Powders/chemistry , Pressure , Root Canal Obturation/methods , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Solutions/chemistry , Temperature , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: An immature tooth with pulpal necrosis and apical periodontitis presents a unique challenge to the endodontist. Endodontic treatment options consist of apexification, apical barriers, or more recently, revascularization. The purpose of this case series is to report three cases that used revascularization protocol as described by Banchs and Trope. Each case presented its own special circumstances and challenges. The lessons learned from each case provided guidance for more predictable outcomes on subsequent cases. METHODS: Six immature teeth with apical periodontitis (in three patients) were treated via the revascularization protocol using irrigants, a triple antibiotic paste, and a coronal seal of mineral trioxide aggregate and composite. RESULTS: For follow-up, all six teeth showed resolution of periapical radiolucencies, whereas three of six teeth showed continued root development. Two teeth displayed a positive response to vitality testing. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this case series show that revascularization is a technically challenging but effective treatment modality for the immature tooth with apical periodontitis. Based on this case series, the following recommendations are made to help with the revascularization technique: (1) clinicians should consider the use of an anesthetic without a vasoconstrictor when trying to induce bleeding, (2) a collagen matrix is useful for the controlled placement of MTA to a desired and optimal level, (3) patients/parents should be informed about the potential for staining, especially in anterior teeth when the paste contains minocycline, and (4) patient/parent compliance with the necessary multiple appointment treatment plan may be significant for case selection.
