A combined pulmonary-radiology workshop for visual evaluation of COPD: study design, chest CT findings and concordance with quantitative evaluation.

UNLABELLED: The purposes of this study were: to describe chest CT findings in normal non-smoking controls and cigarette smokers with and without COPD; to compare the prevalence of CT abnormalities with severity of COPD; and to evaluate concordance between visual and quantitative chest CT (QCT) scoring. METHODS: Volumetric inspiratory and expiratory CT scans of 294 subjects, including normal non-smokers, smokers without COPD, and smokers with GOLD Stage I-IV COPD, were scored at a multi-reader workshop using a standardized worksheet. There were 58 observers (33 pulmonologists, 25 radiologists); each scan was scored by 9-11 observers. Interobserver agreement was calculated using kappa statistic. Median score of visual observations was compared with QCT measurements. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was moderate for the presence or absence of emphysema and for the presence of panlobular emphysema; fair for the presence of centrilobular, paraseptal, and bullous emphysema subtypes and for the presence of bronchial wall thickening; and poor for gas trapping, centrilobular nodularity, mosaic attenuation, and bronchial dilation. Agreement was similar for radiologists and pulmonologists. The prevalence on CT readings of most abnormalities (e.g. emphysema, bronchial wall thickening, mosaic attenuation, expiratory gas trapping) increased significantly with greater COPD severity, while the prevalence of centrilobular nodularity decreased. Concordances between visual scoring and quantitative scoring of emphysema, gas trapping and airway wall thickening were 75%, 87% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial inter-observer variation, visual assessment of chest CT scans in cigarette smokers provides information regarding lung disease severity; visual scoring may be complementary to quantitative evaluation.

Pharmacokinetics, ovulation suppression and return to ovulation following a lower dose subcutaneous formulation of Depo-Provera.

Depo-Provera is a highly effective contraceptive, given intramuscularly (150 mg/mL) once every 3 months. It has been in use in the United States for over 10 years. A new lower-dose formulation of Depo-Provera (104 mg/0.65 mL), has been developed that allows subcutaneous injection, potentially increasing the convenience, ease of administration and tolerability of this contraceptive. This prospective, randomized, single-center, single-dose trial evaluates the pharmacokinetics of the lower-dose formulation of Depo-Provera and compares the lower-dose formulation to the original formulation with regard to efficacy and duration of ovulation suppression and the return to ovulation at 12 months. While delivering a 30% lower total dose than the intramuscular formulation, the lower-dose formulation of Depo-Provera suppressed ovulation for more than 13 weeks in all subjects and was not affected by body mass index or race. Median time for return to ovulation was 30 weeks, with a 97.4% cumulative rate of return to ovulation at 12 months.

Suppression of ovulation by a new subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (104 mg/0.65 mL) contraceptive formulation in Asian women.

BACKGROUND: A new progestin-only, nondaily depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) SC injectable contraceptive suspension (104 mg/0.65 mL) has been developed. Clinical trials (including dose-ranging, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and contraceptive efficacy studies) indicating the effectiveness of this new formulation were conducted primarily in white women. However, results of an early study by the World Health Organization suggested that in Thai women, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) may be metabolized in <91 +/- 7 days (the range for effective suppression of ovulation established in clinical trials), resulting in a faster return to ovulation in this population. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the duration of ovulation suppression and investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of MPA after a single SC injection of DMPA 104 mg/0.65 mL in Asian women. It also assessed the effect of ethnicity and injection site on the duration of ovulation suppression. METHODS: : This was a single-center, single-dose, open-label outpatient trial conducted in Singapore in Asian women aged 18 to 40 years. After 1 control cycle, women with confirmed ovulation were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive an SC injection of DMPA 104 mg/0.65 mL in either the anterior thigh or the abdomen. Serum concentrations of MPA, progesterone, estradiol, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone were measured during the 91-day dosing interval and for an additional 15 days thereafter. RESULTS: Twenty-four Asian women (mean [SD] age, 33.8 [43] years; range, 22.7-40.1 years; mean [SD] body mass index, 22.4 [3.0] kg/m(2)) belonging to 5 ethnic groups (Chinese, Filipino, Indian, Malaysian, and Thai) were included in the study Ovulation suppression was maintained throughout the 91-day dosing interval, regardless of ethnicity or injection site. Ovulation was suppressed for at least 112 days after injection in 23 (95.8%) women, as evidenced by maintenance of serum progesterone concentrations <4.7 ng/mL. The pharmacokinetic parameters for MPA in these Asian women were similar to those previously reported in white women. The most frequently reported adverse events were flulike symptoms and headache, all of mild to moderate intensity. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SC DMPA 104 mg/0.65 mL provided effective suppression of ovulation for at least 91 days in Asian women. Ethnicity and injection site had no effect on MPA profiles.