Diabetes and CVD risk during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker treatment in hypertension: a study of 15,990 patients.

Differences in clinical effectiveness between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the primary treatment of hypertension are unknown. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients treated with ARBs or ACEis. Patients initiated on enalapril or candesartan treatment in 71 Swedish primary care centers between 1999 and 2007 were included. Medical records data were extracted and linked with nationwide hospital discharge and cause of death registers. The 11,725 patients initiated on enalapril and 4265 on candesartan had similar baseline characteristics. During a mean follow-up of 1.84 years, 36,482 patient-years, the risk of new diabetes onset was lower in the candesartan group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.96, P=0.01) compared with the enalapril group. No difference between the groups was observed in CVD risk (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.13, P=0.86). More patients discontinued treatment in the enalapril group (38.1%) vs the candesartan group (27.2%). In a clinical setting, patients initiated on candesartan treatment had a lower risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes and lower rates of drug discontinuation compared with patients initiated on enalapril. No differences in CVD risk were observed.

Triglycerides-diabetes association in healthy middle-aged men: modified by physical fitness? A long term follow-up of 1962 Norwegian men in the Oslo Ischemia Study.

AIMS: To examine the impact of physical fitness (PF) on the association between fasting serum triglycerides (FTG) and diabetes risk and whether temporal changes in FTG predict diabetes risk in healthy middle-aged men. METHODS: FTG and PF (bicycle exercise test) were measured in 1962 men aged 40-59 years in 1972-1975 (Survey 1) and repeated in 1387 still healthy men on average 7.3 years later (Survey 2). Diabetes was diagnosed according to WHO 1985-criteria. RESULTS: During 35 years follow-up 202/1962 (10.3%) men developed diabetes. Compared with the lowest, the upper FTG tertile had a 2.58-fold (95% CI: 1.81-3.74) diabetes risk adjusted for age, fasting blood glucose and maternal diabetes, and a 2.29-fold (95%CI: 1.60-3.33) when also adjusting for PF. Compared with unchanged (±25%) FTG levels (n=664), FTG reduction of more than 25% (n=261) was associated with 56% lower (0.44; 95% CI: 0.24-0.75) diabetes risk, while FTG increase of more than 25% (n=462) was associated with similar risk. These associations were unchanged when adjusted for PF and PF change. CONCLUSIONS: High FTG-levels predicted long-term diabetes risk in healthy middle-aged men, and the association was only modestly weakened when adjusted for PF. A reduction in FTG was associated with decreased diabetes risk.

Changes in body mass index following newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a cohort study of 8486 primary-care patients.

AIMS: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study explored the association between BMI changes in the first 18 months of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and the risk of long-term CVD mortality. METHODS: A total of 8486 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and no previous history of CVD or cancer were identified from 84 primary-care centres in Sweden. During the first year after diagnosis, patients were grouped according to BMI change: 'Increase', or ≥+1 BMI unit; 'unchanged', or between +1 and-1 BMI unit; and 'decrease', or ≤-1 BMI unit. Associations between BMI change and CVD mortality, defined as death from stroke, myocardial infarction or sudden death, were estimated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models (NCT 01121315). RESULTS: Baseline mean age was 60.0 years and mean BMI was 30.2kg/m(2). Patients were followed for up to 9 years (median: 4.6 years). During the first 18 months, 53.4% had no change in their BMI, while 32.2% decreased and 14.4% increased. Compared with patients with unchanged BMI, those with an increased BMI had higher risks of CVD mortality (hazard ratio: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.11-2.39) and all-cause mortality (1.33, 1.01-1.76). BMI decreases had no association with these risks compared with unchanged BMI: 1.06 (0.76-1.48) and 1.06 (0.85-1.33), respectively. CONCLUSION: Increased BMI within the first 18 months of type 2 diabetes diagnosis was associated with an increased long-term risk of CVD mortality. However, BMI decrease did not lower the long-term risk of mortality.

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding--a cohort study of the effects of proton pump inhibitor use patterns.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage patterns and risk of severe gastrointestinal events in patients treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LDA). DESIGN AND SETTING: A nationwide cohort study in Sweden. PATIENTS: All Swedish residents ≥ 40 years of age, without cancer and receiving LDA treatment (≥ 80% adherence for 365 days between 2005 and 2009) were identified in the Swedish Prescription Register. Continuous PPI use was defined as > 60 of 90 days covered by daily PPI doses and further divided into high (≥ 80%) or moderate (< 80) adherence. All other PPI use was defined as intermittent use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of a combined end-point of gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding was analysed using Cox proportional hazard models. We also investigated risk of > 45 days of LDA treatment interruption. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 7880 of 648,807 (1.2%) LDA-treated patients experienced gastrointestinal events. In multivariable-adjusted models, both intermittent-PPI and no-PPI use were associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding compared with continuous PPI use with a high level of adherence [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83 (95% CI 1.66-2.02) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.05-1.23), respectively]. Amongst continuous PPI users, moderate adherence also increased the risk of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding [HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.40)]. The risk of LDA treatment interruption was higher with intermittent PPI use [HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.14-1.19)] than continuous PPI use with high adherence. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of LDA users, intermittent PPI use was associated with higher risk of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding and interrupted LDA treatment, compared with continuous PPI use.

Low-grade systolic murmurs in healthy middle-aged individuals: innocent or clinically significant? A 35-year follow-up study of 2014 Norwegian men.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a low-grade systolic murmur, found at heart auscultation, in middle-aged healthy men influences the long-term risk of aortic valve replacement (AVR) and death from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Setting and subjects. During 1972-1975, 2014 apparently healthy men aged 40-59 years underwent an examination programme including case history, clinical examination, blood tests and a symptom-limited exercise ECG test. Heart auscultation was performed under standardized conditions, and murmurs were graded on a scale from I to VI. No men were found to have grade V/VI murmurs. Participants were followed for up to 35 years. RESULTS: A total of 1541 men had no systolic murmur; 441 had low-grade murmurs (grade I/II) and 32 had moderate-grade murmurs (grade III/IV). Men with low-grade murmurs had a 4.7-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-11.1] increased age-adjusted risk of AVR, but no increase in risk of CVD death. Men with moderate-grade murmurs had an 89.3-fold (95% CI 39.2-211.2) age-adjusted risk of AVR and a 1.5-fold (95% CI 0.8-2.5) age-adjusted increased risk of CVD death. CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade systolic murmur was detected at heart auscultation in 21.9% of apparently healthy middle-aged men. Men with low-grade murmur had an increased risk of AVR, but no increase in risk of CVD death. Only 1.6% of men had moderate-grade murmur; these men had a very high risk of AVR and a 1.5-fold albeit non-significant increase in risk of CVD death.

Health-care costs of losartan and candesartan in the primary treatment of hypertension.

A recent study of two widely used angiotensin receptor blockers reported a reduced risk of cardiovascular events (-14.4%) when using candesartan compared with losartan in the primary treatment of hypertension. In addition to clinical benefits, costs associated with treatment strategies must be considered when allocating scarce health-care resources. The aim of this study was to assess resource use and costs of losartan and candesartan in hypertensive patients. Resource use (drugs, outpatient contacts, hospitalizations and laboratory tests) associated with losartan and candesartan treatment was estimated in 14,100 patients in a real-life clinical setting. We electronically extracted patient data from primary care records and mandatory Swedish national registers for death and hospitalization. Patients treated with losartan had more outpatient contacts (+15.6%), laboratory tests (+13.8%) and hospitalizations (+13.8%) compared with the candesartan group. During a maximum observation time of 9 years, the mean total costs per patient were 10,369 Swedish kronor (95% confidence interval: 3109-17,629) higher in the losartan group. In conclusion, prescribing candesartan for the primary treatment of hypertension results in lower long-term health-care costs compared with losartan.

Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension.

Although angiotensin receptor blockers have different receptor binding properties no comparative studies with cardiovascular disease (CVD) end points have been performed within this class of drugs. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there are blood pressure independent CVD-risk differences between losartan and candesartan treatment in patients with hypertension without known CVD. Seventy-two primary care centres in Sweden were screened for patients who had been prescribed losartan or candesartan between the years 1999 and 2007. Among the 24 943 eligible patients, 14 100 patients were diagnosed with hypertension and prescribed losartan (n=6771) or candesartan (n=7329). Patients were linked to Swedish national hospitalizations and death cause register. There was no difference in blood pressure reduction when comparing the losartan and candesartan groups during follow-up. Compared with the losartan group, the candesartan group had a lower adjusted hazard ratio for total CVD (0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.96, P=0.0062), heart failure (0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82, P=0.0004), cardiac arrhythmias (0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.92, P=0.0330), and peripheral artery disease (0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91, P=0.0140). No difference in blood pressure reduction was observed suggesting that other mechanisms related to different pharmacological properties of the drugs may explain the divergent clinical outcomes.

Possible angina detected by the WHO angina questionnaire in apparently healthy men with a normal exercise ECG: coronary heart disease or not? A 26 year follow up study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether men with possible angina (from their responses to the World Health Organization angina questionnaire) but a normal exercise ECG differ in long term rates of coronary heart disease events from men with no symptoms of angina. DESIGN: During 1972-75, 2014 apparently healthy men aged 40-59 years underwent an examination programme including case history, clinical examination, exercise ECG to exhaustion, and various other tests. All men completed the WHO angina questionnaire. SUBJECTS: Of 2014 men, 68 had possible angina, 1831 had no symptoms of angina, and 115 were excluded because they had definite angina or pathological exercise ECGs. All 68+1831 had normal exercise ECGs and none developed chest pain during the exercise test. RESULTS: At 26 years, men with possible angina had a coronary heart disease mortality of 25.0% (17/68) v 13.8% (252/1831) among men with no symptoms of angina (p < 0.013). They also had a higher incidence of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (p < 0.0004) and acute myocardial infarction (p < 0.026). The excess coronary heart disease mortality among men with possible angina only started after 15 years, whereas differences in CABG/acute myocardial infarction started early. Multivariate analysis including well recognised coronary heart disease risk factors showed that possible angina was an independent risk factor (relative risk 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Men with possible angina, even with a normal exercise test, have a greater risk of dying from coronary heart disease, having an acute myocardial infarct, or needing a CABG than age matched counterparts with no symptoms of angina.