Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 42(12): 2449-62, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9434300

ABSTRACT

Densitometric quantification of coronary artery stenoses in angiographic images can be problematic for two reasons: (i) the x-rays are inadequately oriented with respect to the vessel segments of interest at image acquisition; (ii) non-linear effects due for instance to beam hardening, scattered radiation and veiling glare may reduce the accuracy. As a consequence, appreciable discrepancies between degrees of stenosis measured in two different projections can occur. To overcome these limitations, we have designed and tested a combined correction that compensates (at subsequent analysis) for the error contributions due to the cited sources. It implies 3D reconstruction of the vessel segments of interest and consequently requires an appropriate biplane coronary angiogram. In experiments performed with a dedicated phantom, application of the correction improved the correlation between measured and true area reduction percentages (without correction: y = 1.04x - 4%, r = 0.97, SEE = 6%, n = 35; with correction: y = 1.02x - 0%, r = 0.99, SEE = 3%, n = 35). Applied to ten area stenoses measured biplane in patients and exhibiting strong interplane discrepancies, the correction had a comparable effect (without correction: y = 0.83x - 11%, r = 0.86, SEE = 9%, n = 10; with correction: y = 0.83x + 2%, r = 0.98, SEE = 4%, n = 10). The new densitometric method could possibly be used as a gold standard in the objective evaluation of geometric methods in patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/standards , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Coronary Angiography/methods , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Quality Control , Regression Analysis , Scattering, Radiation
2.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn ; 25(4): 285-9, 1992 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1571989

ABSTRACT

Coronary pacing using as unipolar negative electrode a guidewire placed in a coronary branch was tested in 349 sites of 300 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. It was possible for 339 sites (97%). The threshold currents ranged from 1 to 15 (mean +/- standard deviation 3.4 +/- 2.4) mA. Side effects were seen in 13 patients (4%): 6 (2%) had transient coronary spasm, 4 (1%) had diaphragmatic stimulation, and 3 (1%) had stinging pain at the skin electrode. Of the 10 cases with pacing failure, left ventricular pacing was successfully tested in 5 by introducing the coronary wire or another wire into the left ventricle. It yielded a threshold of 2-8 (3.2 +/- 2.7) mA. Therapeutic pacing for significant bradycardia was required in 7 patients (2%). It was successful in all. Coronary or left ventricular pacing appears to be a simple and reliable temporary measure. When there is no wire in the coronary artery or for diagnostic catheterization, left ventricular pacing can be done using the same setup and any type of guidewire.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Bradycardia/therapy , Coronary Disease/therapy , Pacemaker, Artificial , Bradycardia/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Equipment Design , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...