Role of secretory phospholipase A2 in women with metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2), a member of the phospholipase A2 superfamily of enzymes that hydrolyses phospholipids, is a potentially useful plasma biomarker for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality in women. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between cardiovascular risk factors and the sPLA2 levels in women with metabolic syndrome as compared to women without metabolic syndrome and men with metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Patients (n=100) with various cardiovascular risk factors consecutively evaluated at the Rehabilitation Hospital-Cardiology Department, Cluj-Napoca, Romania were enrolled during 2011, of whom 10 were excluded. The patients were divided in three groups: group 1 (37 women with metabolic syndrome), group 2 (27 men with metabolic syndrome), and group 3 (26 women without metabolic syndrome). Body weight, smoking habits, glycaemia, hypertension, and serum lipids fractions were analysed as cardiovascular factors. Serum sPLA2 activity was measured using the chromogenic method. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant correlations between sPLA2 levels and the investigated risk factors, irrespective of patient groups. However, there were significant positive correlations between sPLA2 and hsCRP in all three groups (P<0.05). In women with no metabolic syndrome an negative correlation was found between sPLA2 levels and HDL-C- r=-0.419, P=0.03. In men with metabolic syndrome there was a direct correlation between sPLA 2 levels and HOMA, r=0.43, P<0.05, 95% CI (-0.098; 1.15). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Women with metabolic syndrome did not display different sPLA2 levels as compared to men with metabolic syndrome and women without metabolic syndrome. However, women with metabolic syndrome demonstrated a low but positive correlation between sPLA2 and hsCRP levels.

The effect of very short duration acute physical exercise upon adiponectin and leptin in overweight subjects.

BACKGROUND: Adiponectin is decreased and leptin increased in overweight subjects. In turn, exercise has controversial effect upon adiponectin and leptin plasmatic levels. PURPOSE: To study the effect of acute exercise upon plasmatic levels of adiponectin and leptin in normal and overweight subjects. METHOD: We studied 79 subjects, 42 males and 37 females, aged 56 +/- 9 years, divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 19 patients with body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/(m)2 and group II consisted of 60 overweight subjects (BMI > 25 kg/(m)2). All subjects were submitted to a maximal symptom limited exercise stress testing on cycloergometer, upon classical protocols (mean effort 103 +/- 27 Ws). Venous blood samples were obtained before exercise (sample I) and at 30 minutes after the effort was stopped (sample II); adiponectin and leptin levels were determined, using ELISA method. RESULTS: At rest adiponectin is significantly decreased and leptin increased in overweight subjects. In turn, during exercise the values of the two adipokines were not significantly different from those registered at rest in both groups, even if the adiponectin remained at a low level and leptin decreased at the limit of significance in overweight subjects. Considering men and women, the data are similar for men but, after exercise, overweight women registered a significant reduction of the leptin values. Also at rest adiponectin levels are more increased in overweight women (p = 0.01). This suggests that overweight women can be protected in comparison with men and exercise could add a supplementary benefice. CONCLUSION: Acute exercise has little effect upon adiponectin and leptin levels, but rest adiponectin is increased and leptin significantly decreased during exercise in overweight women and could be beneficial to this category of subjects.

The acute effect of Metoprolol upon NT-proBNP level in patients with congestive heart failure.

UNLABELLED: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a sensitive and specific marker of left ventricular (LV) function. The acute effect of beta blockers upon plasma BNP levels in CHF patients has been less studied but it is important because of the initial possible depressing effect upon LV function. PURPOSE: To investigate the acute effect of oral Metoprolol upon plasma proBNP levels in CHF patients. METHODS: There were included 56 patients with congestive heart failure, 38 with ischemic heart disease and 18 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 40 males and 16 females, aged between 25 and 65 years, who were compared with 19 healthy individuals, 12 males and 7 females, of the same age. All patients were free of beta blockers treatment. Plasma Nt-proBNP was determined in fasting state using ELISA method (NV <250 fmol/mL). After this, every patient received 50 mg Metoprolol succinate and at three hours (considered as peak plasmatic concentration) venous blood samples were again obtained and Nt-proBNP determined. RESULTS: NT-pro BNP was increased (1400 +/- 130 fmol/mL) in heart failure patients and normal (187 +/- 17.2 fmol/mL) in healthy controls. After Metoprolol the plasmatic level of NT-proBNP was not significantly different in both healthy controls (162 +/- 13.3 fmol/mL) and heart failure patients (1419 +/- 133 fmol/ml) in comparison with baseline values. After Metoprolol NT-proBNP decreased (from 1266 +/- 121 to 1120 +/- 107, p>0.05) in III NYHA class patients and increased (from 1457 +/- 142 to 1530 +/- 150, p<0.05) in IV NYHA class patients. It remained unchanged in patients with LVEF >30% (1384 +/- 140 vs 1389 +/- 129 fmol/mL) and increased (from 1480 +/- 134 to 1690 +/- 161 fmol/mL, p<0.05) in patients with LVEF <30%; it was not significantly modified in patients with atrial fibrillation in comparison with those in sinus rhythm (1348 +/- 132 vs 1516 +/- 168 fmol/mL). CONCLUSION: Beta blockers do not have a severe depressant effect on left ventricular performance in all patients with systolic heart failure. A LVEF>30% suggests, but the lack of modification of NT-proBNP levels after administration of 50 mg Metoprolol confirm, that the beta blocking treatment can be initiated with higher doses than those recommended until now.

Cardiac peptides during exercise test in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac peptides are increased at rest in heart failure patients representing a useful diagnostic tool for this condition. Recently it has been demonstrated that cardiac peptides increase also during myocardial ischemia. Cardiac peptides increase during exercise in heart failure patients, but it has not been established yet if the increase is the same in ischemic and nonischemic patients. METHODS: There were studied 50 heart failure patients, 32 ischemic and 18 nonischemic, 35 males and 15 females aged 61.8 +/- 11.61 after the relief of congestive syndrome, which was submitted to a symptom-limited exercise stress test on a cycloergometer. Blood samples were obtained at rest and at a peak effort and the plasmatic values of NT-proBNP (NV<250 fmoles/mL) and of NT-proANP (NV<1950 fmoles/mL) were determined using the ELISA method. RESULTS: At rest, both NT-proBNP and NT-proANP were more increased in nonischemic (1104.33 +/- 730; 3275.55 +/- 3424) than in ischemic patients (685.68 +/- 452.01, 2265.0 +/- 2552.32) with significant differences only for NT-proBNP (p=0.016). During exercise NT-proBNP increase from 836.40 +/- 596.34 to 1403.92 +/- 2126.21 and NT-proANP from 2628.80 +/- 2903.41 to 3701.30 +/- 3237.76, the final values being again more increased in nonischemic patients (NT-proBNP-2945.44 +/- 3257.89; NT-proANP-3174 +/- 2905); for NT-proBNP p<0.05. The results suggest that the stretching effect during exercise is more increased at the ventricular level in comparison with the atrial level (67% increase for NT-proBNP and only 40% for NT-proANP). Surprisingly, myocardial ischemia does not increase additionally cardiac peptides either at rest or during exercise. Our data suggest that the intracardiac pressure is more important than ischemia in determining the increase of cardiac peptides in heart failure patients because the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in nonischemic patients (40.03 +/- 5.5 vs 38.11 +/- 4.07). CONCLUSION: Cardiac peptides are increased, both at rest and during exercise, in nonischemic heart failure patients in comparison with ischemic ones, probably in relationship with the lower left ventricular systolic function.