Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 182(1): e1576-e1583, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28051976

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Persistent stigma, lack of knowledge about mental health, and negative attitudes toward treatment are among the most significant barriers to military service members and veterans seeking behavioral health care. With the high rates of untreated behavioral health needs among service members and veterans, identifying effective programs for reducing barriers to care is a national priority. This study adapted Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), an evidence-based program for increasing mental health knowledge, decreasing stigma, and increasing laypeople's confidence in helping and frequency of referring people in need, for military and veteran populations and pilot tested the adapted training program with 4 Army National Guard armories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 176 community first responders (CFRs) participated in a comparative outcomes study, with 69 receiving the training and 107 participating in the control group. CFRs were individuals in natural positions within the Armory or home communities of Guard members to identify and help service members in mental health crisis. Surveys assessing confidence in helping, attitudes toward help seeking, knowledge of resources, use of MHFA practices, and stigma were completed before the training, immediately post-training, at 4 months post-training, and at 8 months post-training. Analyses included repeated measures analysis of variances on data from CFRs who received the training and mixed between-within subjects analysis of variances comparing the intervention and control group longitudinally at three time points. Institutional review board approval for this study was received from Montana State University and the U.S. Army Medical Department, Medical Research and Materiel Command, Human Research Protection Office. RESULTS: Significant and meaningful improvements in confidence (p < 0.05, η2 = 0.49), knowledge (p < 0.05, η2 = 0.39), behaviors (p < 0.05, η2 = 0.27), and stigma (p < 0.05, η2 = 0.16) were observed among trainees. When compared to a control group, statistically meaningful differences in change over time were observed for knowledge (η2 = 0.03), attitudes (η2 = 0.02), confidence (η2 = 0.06), and stigma (η2 = 0.02), with a significant and meaningful difference observed for practice behaviors (p < 0.05, η2 = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Results from the comparative outcomes pilot study of military and veterans MHFA indicate that the intervention is acceptable and feasible to implement in National Guard Armories and among non-Guard community-based first responders. There was a significant intervention effect detected for the likelihood that a CFR would use appropriate engagement, support, and referral practices when identifying someone in need of mental health support. In addition, there were positive growth trends in the data for improvements in confidence, knowledge of mental health resources, attitudes toward help seeking, and stigma, which indicate that with a larger number of participants and armories we would expect to see significant intervention effects. Study weaknesses included insufficient power and demographic data for more robust analyses of intervention effects. A larger randomized controlled trial is recommended for better establishing efficacy; however, these results indicate that Military and Veterans MHFA is a promising intervention for reducing critical barriers to care.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mental Disorders/psychology , Military Personnel/psychology , Social Stigma , Teaching/standards , Analysis of Variance , Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Self Efficacy , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Gen Psychol ; 138(3): 185-200, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21842622

ABSTRACT

The authors surveyed women from 2 communities: Anchorage, Alaska (N =51), an urban area, and Haines, Alaska (N=41), an isolated rural community. Participants from Haines scored lower on measures of self-objectification, internalization of sociocultural attitudes toward appearance, participation in beauty enhancement behaviors, and perceived normative beauty enhancement behaviors. Women from Haines also engaged in more empowering exercise (i.e., yoga and outdoor exercise). Internalization of sociocultural attitudes toward appearance mediated the relation between perceived normative beauty enhancement behaviors and self-objectification for women living in both communities. The current study suggests that communities may present opportunities to engage in activities that influence one's predisposition to self-objectify. The nonexperimental nature of this study, however, prevents the definitive establishment of the direction of causality between variables.


Subject(s)
Residence Characteristics , Rural Population , Self Concept , Urban Population , Women/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alaska , Body Image , Culture , Exercise , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...