Clinical outcome after high-precision radiotherapy for skull base meningiomas: Pooled data from three large German centers for radiation oncology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcome in patients with base of skull meningiomas treated with modern high precision radiation therapy (RT) techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 927 patients from three centers were treated with either radiosurgery or fractionated high-precision RT for meningiomas. Treatment planning was based on CT and MRI following institutional guidelines. For radiosurgery, a median dose of 13 Gy was applied, for fractionated treatments, a median dose of 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy single fractions was prescribed. Follow-up included a clinical examination as well as contrast-enhanced imaging. All patients were followed up prospectively after radiotherapy in the three departments within a strict follow-up regimen. The median follow-up time was 81 months (range 1-348 months). RESULTS: Median local control was 79 months (range 1-348 months). Local control (LC) was 98% at 1 year, 94% at 3 years, 92% at 5 years and 86% at 10 years. There was no difference between radiosurgery and fractionated RT. We analyzed the influence of higher doses on LC and could show that dose did not impact LC. Moreover, there was no difference between 54 Gy and 57.6 Gy in the fractionated group. Side effects were below 5% in both groups without any severe treatment-related complications. DISCUSSION: Based on the pooled data analysis this manuscript provides a large series of meningiomas of the skull base treated with modern high precision RT demonstrating excellent local control and low rates of side effects. Such data support the recommendation of RT for skull base meningiomas in the interdisciplinary tumor board discussions. The strong role of RT must influence treatment recommendations keeping in mind the individual risk-benefit profile of treatment alternatives.

First clinical experience with intravenous recombinant human relaxin in compensated heart failure.

Relaxin is upregulated and plays a compensatory role in human heart failure. We therefore determined the safety of and dose response to human relaxin in stable patients with heart failure. Sixteen patients were treated with open-label intravenous relaxin in three sequential dose cohorts and monitored hemodynamically during the 24-h infusion and postinfusion periods. The safety demonstrated in group A (treatment for 8 h each with dosages equivalent to 10, 30, and 100 microg/kg/day) allowed escalation to group B (240, 480, and 960 microg/kg/day), and the highest safe dose, 960 microg/kg/day, was selected for a 24-h dosing in group C. Relaxin showed no relevant adverse effects and produced hemodynamic effects consistent with systemic vasodilation, i.e., trends toward increases in the cardiac index and decreases in pulmonary wedge pressure, without inducing hypotension. The first therapeutic use of relaxin in human heart failure demonstrated favorable hemodynamic effects and indicated that it may be of value in the treatment of this widespread disease.

Intravenous recombinant human relaxin in compensated heart failure: a safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic trial.

BACKGROUND: Relaxin is upregulated in human heart failure (HF). Animal and clinical data suggest beneficial hemodynamic and renal effects from vasodilation. We determined safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic effects of human Relaxin in stable HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated with open-label intravenous Relaxin in 3 dose-escalation cohorts and monitored hemodynamically for 24-hour infusion and postinfusion periods and followed until Day 30. The safety demonstrated in Group A (8-hour sequential infusions at dose levels of 10, then 30, and then 100 microg x kg x day equivalents) allowed escalation to Group B (240, 480, and 960 microg x kg x day). The highest safe dose, 960 microg x kg x day, was selected for a 24-hour infusion in Group C. Relaxin showed no adverse effects; produced hemodynamic effects consistent with vasodilation (ie, trends toward increases in cardiac index, decreases in pulmonary wedge pressure, and decreases in circulating NT-pro BNP without inducing hypotension; improved markers of renal function [creatinine, blood urea nitrogen]). The highest dose caused a transient elevation in creatinine and blood urea nitrogen at Day 9 that was without apparent clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Relaxin was safe and well-tolerated in patients with stable HF, and preliminary pharmacodynamic responses suggest it causes vasodilation. Further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of this drug in HF appears warranted.