Impact of the Interdisciplinary Tumor Board of the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study Group on local therapy and overall survival of Ewing sarcoma patients after induction therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Interdisciplinary Tumor Board (ITB) of the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study (CESS) Group was investigated to assess its impact on the overall survival (OAS) of Ewing sarcoma (EwS) patients. The ITB functions as a reference center for the international institutions participating in the clinical trials of the CESS group, but is also available internationally to patients who have not been treated within an appropriate clinical trial. The value of tumor boards in terms of benefit for the patients and the health care system in general is not well documented and is also the subject of controversial discussions. A review of the representative literature is included. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 481 patients who had been registered into the European Ewing Tumor Working Initiative of National Groups (EURO E.W.I.N.G.-99) clinical trial via the CESS data center between 2006 and 2009; this included 331 patients with localized disease and another 150 individuals with metastases at diagnosis. Median follow-up time was 3.2 years. RESULTS: Improved OAS was observed for patients with metastases who had received recommendations from the ITB compared with those who had not received recommendations. In patients with localized disease, a recommendation from the ITB had no influence on OAS. CONCLUSION: As a reference center for a rare disease, recommendations from our ITB impacted local therapy and led to higher OAS in patients with metastatic disease. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis that examines the value of a reference tumor board on a rare disease.

The updated ESTRO core curricula 2011 for clinicians, medical physicists and RTTs in radiotherapy/radiation oncology.

INTRODUCTION: In 2007 ESTRO proposed a revision and harmonisation of the core curricula for radiation oncologists, medical physicists and RTTs to encourage harmonised education programmes for the professional disciplines, to facilitate mobility between EU member states, to reflect the rapid development of the professions and to secure the best evidence-based education across Europe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Working parties for each core curriculum were established and included a broad representation with geographic spread and different experience with education from the ESTRO Educational Committee, local representatives appointed by the National Societies and support from ESTRO staff. RESULTS: The revised curricula have been presented for the ESTRO community and endorsement is ongoing. All three curricula have been changed to competency based education and training, teaching methodology and assessment and include the recent introduction of the new dose planning and delivery techniques and the integration of drugs and radiation. The curricula can be downloaded at http://www.estro-education.org/europeantraining/Pages/EuropeanCurricula.aspx. CONCLUSION: The main objective of the ESTRO core curricula is to update and harmonise training of the radiation oncologists, medical physicists and RTTs in Europe. It is recommended that the authorities in charge of the respective training programmes throughout Europe harmonise their own curricula according to the common framework.

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma with metastases confined to the lungs: report from the CWS Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma [RME] is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma. Whereas the prognosis of localized rhabdomyosarcoma has improved, it remains poor for metastatic disease. METHODS: We analyzed RME-patients with isolated pulmonary metastases [PRME] treated in four consecutive CWS-trials. Treatment included multiagent chemotherapy and local treatment of the primary tumor. Therapy of lung metastases after induction chemotherapy depended on response and individual decisions. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients <21 years had PRME. Their median age was six years, the median follow-up nine years. Twenty-eight children had their primary tumor located in an unfavorable site and 22 of the primaries were >5 cm. In addition to conventional chemotherapy, seven patients received high-dose treatment and eight patients oral metronomic chemotherapy. The lung metastases were in remission after induction chemotherapy in 22 individuals. 19 patients received no local treatment of metastases; 3 patients had pulmonary metastasectomy and lung radiation was administered to 9 individuals. In total, 24/29 patients achieved a complete remission [CR]. Actuarial 5-year event-free and overall survival for all patients was 37.9 ± 18% and 48.7 ± 18%, respectively; it was 45.8 ± 20% and 58.3 ± 20% for the 24 patients who achieved a CR. Local treatment of metastases had no impact on the failure pattern. Younger age, good response, achievement of CR and maintenance-treatment were favorable prognostic factors in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Children with PRME have a fair prognosis. Local treatment of metastases did not improve outcome in our sample. Metronomic treatment may be an attractive option for PREM-patients.

The value of local treatment in patients with primary, disseminated, multifocal Ewing sarcoma (PDMES).

BACKGROUND: The value of local treatment in patients with primary, disseminated, multifocal Ewing sarcoma (PDMES) was investigated. METHODS: We analyzed 120 patients registered into the European Ewing Tumor Working Initiative of National Groups (EURO-E.W.I.N.G. 99) trial at the trial center of Muenster from 1998 to 2006. Median age was 16.2 years. Local treatment of the primary tumor was surgery in 26 of 120 patients, surgery and radiotherapy in 21 patients, and definitive radiotherapy in 40 patients. For treatment of metastases, 6 of 120 patients received surgery; 9 patients, surgery and radiotherapy; and 33 patients, definitive radiotherapy. Forty-seven (39%) patients had local treatment of both the primary tumor and metastases, 41 (34%) patients of either the primary tumor or metastases, and 32 (27%) received no local therapy. RESULTS: Event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.16-0.33). Univariate analyses demonstrated the impact of local therapy given to the primary tumor: 3-year EFS was 0.25 with surgery, 0.47 with surgery and radiotherapy, 0.23 with radiotherapy, and 0.13 when no local therapy was administered (P < .001). Three-year EFS in PDMES was also influenced by the local treatment: surgery, 0.33; surgery and radiotherapy, 0.56; radiotherapy, 0.35; no local therapy, 0.16 (P = .003). Three-year EFS was 0.39 in patients who received local treatment of both primary tumor and PDMES, compared with 0.17 in patients with any local treatment of either primary tumor or PDMES and 0.14 in patients with no local therapy (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed absence of local treatment to be the major risk factor (HR = 2.21; P = .027; n = 20). CONCLUSIONS: Local therapy of involved sites is important for patients with PDMES and should complement systemic treatment whenever possible.