Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting oral prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children 6 to 12 years old and in adults. Information on the pharmacokinetic profile of LDX in children with ADHD is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic properties of d-amphetamine delivery from LDX, and intact LDX with increasing doses of LDX administered in children with ADHD. METHODS: This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 3-period crossover study was conducted in children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD symptoms that adversely affected school performance and required a medication switch. Eligible patients had prior stimulant experience, with good tolerability. Patients were administered a single oral dose of LDX 30, 50, or 70 mg in a randomized sequence. Each study period was separated by a 6-day washout. The pharmacokinetic properties of d-amphetamine and intact LDX were calculated over 48 hours. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using physical examination, including vital sign measurements, and ECG. RESULTS: The study enrolled 18 children (mean [SD] age, 9.6 [1.9] years [range, 6-12 years]; 56% boys; weight, 36.0 [7.6] kg; 44% white, 44% black). Mean (%CV) C(max) values of d-amphetamine postdose were 53.2 (18.1), 93.3 (19.5), and 134.0 (19.4) ng/mL with LDX 30, 50, and 70 mg, respectively (T(max), approximately 3.5 hours). These findings suggest that the overall AUC for d-amphetamine was dose proportional. The intact LDX AUC was 10% to 20% higher in girls than in boys, and for d-amphetamine was <10% higher. The most commonly reported AEs, of 17 total cases, with 30-, 50-, and 70-mg LDX were anorexia (4 [22%], 7 [41%], and 8 [47%], respectively), elevated blood pressure (2 [11%], 1 [6%], and 3 [18%]), and abdominal pain (2 [11%], 2 [12%], and 2 [12%]). All AEs were mild or moderate. No serious AEs were reported. One child was withdrawn from the analysis because of pharyngitis considered to be unrelated to LDX use. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study in a small, select population of children with ADHD suggest that the concentrations of d-amphetamine, the active metabolite of LDX, after single-dose administration of LDX at increasing doses appeared to be dose proportional and had low interpatient variability.

Long-term tolerability of the methylphenidate transdermal system in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a multicenter, prospective, 12-month, open-label, uncontrolled, phase III extension of four clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Short-term treatment with the meth-ylphenidate transdermal system (MTS) has been well tolerated in several clinical trials in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the effects of long-term use have not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the 12-month tolerability of MTS in children with ADHD. Effectiveness was a secondary objective. METHODS: This Phase III study was a multicenter, 12-month, open-label, flexible-dose extension of 4 previous trials. In those studies, children aged 6 to 12 years with a diagnosis of ADHD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria) received MTS, osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate, or placebo. At entry into the present study, the children either continued to receive their optimal dose of MTS (10, 15, 20, or 30 mg per 9-hour patch wear time) or underwent dose titration over 4 weeks to an optimal MTS dose, which was continued for the remainder of the study. Tolerability was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, and the occurrence of application-site reactions. RESULTS: Of 327 enrolled subjects, 326 received treatment and 157 completed the study. The majority of enrolled subjects were male (64.8%) and white (73.7%), with a mean (SD) age of 9.2 (1.9) years. Two hundred sixty-five (81.3%) of the 326 subjects who received MTS reported AEs. AEs led to study discontinuation in 29 subjects (8.9%). The majority (98.3%) of treatment-emergent AEs were of mild or moderate severity. The most common AEs were decreased appetite (24.8%), headache (16.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (12.3%), cough (11.7%), pyrexia (10.1%), and decreased weight (10.1%). Of the 1118 AEs, 40.8% were considered possibly or probably related to study treatment. Three serious AEs (facial contusion, ankle fracture, and syncope) occurred and were considered unrelated to study treatment. Based on data collected across all study visits, application-site reactions generally consisted of mild erythema associated with mild discomfort at the patch site. Application-site reactions accounted for 22 (6.7%) study discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: Slightly less than half (48.0%) of subjects completed this 12-month, open-label extension study of MTS. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity and, with the exception of application-site reactions, were typical of those previously observed with methylphenidate. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00151957.

Varying the wear time of the methylphenidate transdermal system in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder often have varying needs for coverage of their symptoms throughout the day. The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy, duration of action, and safety of methylphenidate transdermal system worn for variable times by children (ages 6-12) diagnosed with ADHD. METHOD: Methylphenidate dose was optimized over 5 weeks using 10-, 15-, 20-, or 30-mg patches worn for 9 hours. The efficacy of 4- and 6-hour wear times was then assessed in an Analog Classroom setting during a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-way crossover phase. The main efficacy measures were the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale deportment scale and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance math test. RESULTS: All of the efficacy measures indicated that 4- and 6-hour wear times improved ADHD symptoms and that medication effects on the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale deportment scale and Permanent Product Measure of Performance math test decreased between 2 and 4 hours after patch removal. The majority of adverse events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the duration of medication effect is related to the wear time of the patch and may be tailored to accommodate the schedules of patients.

Pharmacokinetics of a guanfacine extended-release formulation in children and adolescents with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of an oral extended-release formulation of guanfacine in children and adolescents with a diagnosis of attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). DESIGN: Phase I-II, open-label, dose-escalation study. SETTING: Clinical study center. PATIENTS: Fourteen children (aged 6-12 yrs) and 14 adolescents (aged 13-17 yrs) with ADHD. INTERVENTION: All patients received guanfacine as a single 2-mg dose on day 1. They received a daily dose of 2 mg on days 9-15, 3 mg on days 16-22, and 4 mg on days 23-29. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood samples, vital signs, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained before dosing on day 1 and at intervals over 24 hours, with repeat measurements on days 14 and 28. Guanfacine demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics. Mean plasma concentrations, peak exposure (C(max)), and total or 24-hour exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC](0-infinity) or AUC(0-24), respectively) were as follows in children and adolescents, respectively: after a single 2-mg dose, AUC(0-infinity) was 65.2 +/- 23.9 ng x hour/ml and 47.3 +/- 13.7 ng x hour/ml and C(max) was 2.55 +/- 1.03 ng x ml and 1.69 +/- 0.43 ng/ml after multiple 2-mg doses, AUC(0-24) was 70.0 +/- 28.3 ng x hour/ml and 48.2 +/- 16.1 ng x hour/ml and C(max) was 4.39 +/- 1.66 ng/ml and 2.86 +/- 0.77 ng/ml; and after multiple 4-mg doses, AUC(0-24) was 162 +/- 116 ng x hour/ml and 117 +/- 28.4 ng x hour/ml and C(max) was 10.1 +/- 7.09 ng/ml and 7.01 +/- 1.53 ng/ml. After a single 2-mg dose, half-life was 14.4 +/- 2.39 hours in children and 17.9 +/- 5.77 hours in adolescents. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, insomnia, headache, blurred vision, and altered mood. Most were mild to moderate in severity, with the highest frequency associated with the 4-mg doses. Blood pressure, pulse, and ECG reading.hour/ml s were all within normal limits. CONCLUSION: Guanfacine extended-release formulation demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics. Plasma concentrations and concentration-related pharmacokinetic parameters were higher in children than in adolescents. These differences are likely due to heavier body weights in adolescents and young male subjects. No serious adverse events were reported.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study.

BACKGROUND: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive prodrug in which d-amphetamine is covalently bound to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid. Pharmacologically active d-amphetamine is released from lisdexamfetamine following oral ingestion. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover study compared the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine (LDX: 30, 50, or 70 mg) with placebo, with mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR: 10, 20, or 30 mg) included as a reference arm of the study, in 52 children aged 6 to 12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an analog classroom setting. The primary efficacy measure was the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale; secondary efficacy measures included the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Derived Measures, and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale. RESULTS: LDX treatment significantly improved scores on SKAMP-deportment, SKAMP-attention, PERMP-attempted, PERMP-correct, and CGI-improvement from baseline. Adverse events were similar for both active treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In a laboratory classroom environment, LDX significantly improved ADHD symptoms versus placebo in school-age children with ADHD.

A comparison of once-daily and divided doses of modafinil in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of several modafinil dosing regimens in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to determine whether modafinil can be given once daily in pediatric ADHD. METHOD: Children and adolescents (age range, 6-13 years) (N = 248) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD were enrolled in a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted February-May 2002. The group was assigned to receive oral (100-mg tablets) modafinil 300 mg once daily (300 mg in the morning followed by placebo at midday), modafinil 300 mg as a divided dose (100/200 mg or 200/100 mg), or matching placebo. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, a higher dose of 400 mg (200/200 mg) was evaluated. Efficacy measures included the teacher-rated School Version and clinician-rated Home Version of the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and the parent-completed Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scales. RESULTS: 223 children completed the study. Those who received modafinil 300 mg once daily showed a significantly greater improvement (change from baseline) than those who received placebo in symptoms of ADHD across all rating scales and subscales (all p < .05). Divided 300-mg doses of modafinil provided some significant but inconsistent improvements in ADHD symptoms. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, modafinil 400 mg (200/200 mg) was significantly superior to placebo on clinician- and parent-completed scales (all p < .05). Insomnia was the only adverse event to occur with significantly greater frequency in a modafinil group (200/100) than in the placebo group (14% vs. 2%) (p = .03). CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improved ADHD symptoms in children. Once-daily dosing (300 mg) provided the most consistent improvement in symptoms. All dosing regimens of modafinil were well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (adderall XR) in the management of oppositional defiant disorder with or without comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-aged children and adolescents: A 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, forced-dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)is associated with a high degree of impairment in social skills, family interaction, and academic functioning. Comorbid ODD is reportedly present in 40% to 70% of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) for the treatment of ODD in children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years. METHODS: This was a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, forced-dose-escalation study. Patients were randomized to receive active treatment with MAS XR 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg/d or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the ODD subscale of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-IV (SNAP-IV) parent rating. Primary safety measures included adverse events recorded at each visit and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation, and changes in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, laboratory tests and physical examinations, and body weight. A post hoc efficacy reanalysis was completed based on the results for the per-protocol population. For this analysis, patients were divided into high and low baseline severity categories according to the dichotomized baseline ODD parent or teacher score or dichotomized baseline ADHD parent or teacher score (high defined as scores at the median or greater and low defined as scores less than the median). RESULTS: A total of 308 children and adolescents (age range, 6-17 years; 213 males, 95 females) were randomized to receive active treatment with MAS XR 10 mg/d (n = 60) 20 mg/d (n = 58), 30 mg/d (n = 69), or 40 mg/d (n = 61) or placebo (n = 60). Of the 308 study patients, 244 (79.2%) had comorbid ADHD. A significant change from baseline in the ODD symptoms measured with the SNAP-IV parent rating subscale was found for the MAS XR 30-mg/d (-0.52; P < 0.001) and 40-mg/d (-0.56; P = 0.002) groups in the per-protocol analysis and for the MAS XR 30-mg/d group in the intent-to-treat analysis (-0.42; P < 0.005). Throughout the study, MAS XR was well tolerated in these children and adolescents with ODD, and most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity. The most frequently reported adverse events occurring in MAS XR-treated patients were anorexia/decreased appetite (25.3%), insomnia (19.5%), headache (18.5%), and abdominal pain (10.7%). Statistically, but not clinically, significant decreases in body weight were seen with MAS XR (range, -1.1 to -3.5 lb; P < 0.001 vs placebo). Changes in laboratory values, ECG measurements, and physical and other vital signs were also not clinically significant. The post hoc reanalysis was based on the per-protocol population (n = 229). An assessment of the high baseline symptom severity subgroups showed a good response to MAS XR treatment for the SNAP-IV parent and teacher rating scales (both, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study found that higher doses ofMAS XR (30 and 40 mg) were effective and well tolerated in the management of ODD in these school aged children and adolescents in the presence or absence of ADHD.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of modafinil in children and adolescents, ages 7 to 17, with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: In this 9-week, double-blind, flexible-dose study, patients were randomized to once-daily modafinil (170-425 mg) or placebo. Assessments included ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) School and Home Versions and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were randomized. Modafinil produced significant reductions in ADHD-RS-IV total scores at school (n = 128; mean change +/- SD: -17.5 +/- 13.1 points) compared with placebo (n = 66; -9.7 +/- 10.3 points; p < .0001). Similarly, modafinil reduced ADHD-RS-IV total scores at home compared with placebo (-17.6 +/- 13.3 versus -7.5 +/- 11.8 points; p < .0001). Fifty-two percent of patients randomized to modafinil and 18% of those randomized to placebo met prestudy criteria for responder on the CGI-I (p < .0001). Randomization to modafinil was associated with significantly more insomnia, headache, decreased appetite, and weight loss than randomization to placebo, but discontinuation attributed to adverse events did not differ statistically between treatment groups (modafinil, 5%; placebo, 6%). CONCLUSION: Modafinil was well tolerated and reduced ADHD symptoms at school and home compared with placebo.

Modafinil in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a preliminary 8-week, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: In a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the attention-promoting agent modafinil improved symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents and was well tolerated. To assess the continued efficacy of modafinil and obtain additional safety data, an 8-week, open-label study was conducted as an extension to the double-blind study. METHOD: Two hundred and twenty children and young adolescents (age range, 6-14 years) with ADHD who had completed 4 weeks of the double-blind period or had withdrawn for reasons other than an adverse event were enrolled. Patients received individually titrated doses of modafinil (100-400 mg), administered once daily or as a divided dose. Patients visited the clinic at open-label weeks 2, 4, and 8 for assessments of efficacy. Efficacy was assessed using the parent- or clinician-completed ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Home Version, the parent-completed Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scale Parent Version (CADS-P), and the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Modafinil improved symptoms on all ADHD rating scales and subscales during the open-label extension. Mean change (baseline to final visit) in Total score on the ADHD-RS-IV was -14.6 (95% CI: -16.40 to -12.70); and -7.6 (95% CI: -8.65 to -6.62) and -6.9 (95% CI: -7.90 to -5.94) in the Inattention and Hyperactivity-impulsivity scores, respectively. The mean Total score [SD] on the CADS-P decreased from baseline (74.4 [10.3]) to the final visit (63.2 [13.1]) (change: -11.2, 95% CI: -13.08 to -9.65). Fifty-three percent of patients were rated as much or very much improved on the CGI-I. Insomnia (13%) and headache (10%) were the most common adverse events. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in physical examination findings, electrocardiography, blood pressure, pulse, or body temperature. Clinically significant changes (increase or decrease) in body weight of 7% or more were observed for 30 patients (14%), with decreases (mean, 3.2 kg) reported for 22 patients (10%) and increases (mean, 3.7 kg) reported for eight patients (4%). CONCLUSION: Modafinil remained efficacious and well tolerated in children with ADHD, improving ADHD symptoms and overall clinical condition during the open-label study. Limitations of the study include open-label dosing and lack of a placebo control.

Efficacy and safety of modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study.

OBJECTIVE: Modafinil, which is structurally and pharmacologically different from other agents that are used for the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), selectively activates the cortex and has low potential for abuse. Initial studies of the use of modafinil to treat ADHD showed significant improvements in the core symptoms of the disorder, namely inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. This study evaluated a new formulation of modafinil (modafinil film-coated tablets) in children and adolescents with ADHD. METHODS: This 9-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study evaluated the film-coated tablet formulation of modafinil, which was titrated to an optimal dose on the basis of efficacy and tolerability (range: 170-425 mg once daily). Efficacy was assessed by clinicians who completed the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) based on interviews with teachers (School Version) and parents (Home Version) and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale. Safety evaluation was based on assessments of adverse event reports, laboratory tests, vital signs, and body weight. RESULTS: A total of 248 subjects were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio, and 246 were treated with modafinil (n = 164) or placebo (n = 82). Treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographics and baseline characteristics. Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) showed that compared with placebo, treatment with modafinil significantly improved the core symptoms of ADHD as shown by greater reductions in the ADHD-RS-IV School Version total scores from baseline to final visit (mean change [SD]: -15.0 [11.8] vs -7.3 [9.7]) (effect size: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.82). Significant improvements were observed with modafinil treatment on the ADHD-RS-IV School Version at week 1, with improvements maintained throughout the study. Similar differences in symptom improvements were observed on the ADHD-RS-IV Home Version between modafinil-treated and placebo-treated patients. Treatment with modafinil also significantly reduced subscale scores for inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity on both School and Home Versions compared with placebo. At the final visit, 48% of modafinil-treated patients were rated as "much" or "very much" improved in overall clinical condition compared with 17% of placebo-treated patients (Clinical Global Impression of Improvement). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and the majority resolved during treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events in the modafinil group were insomnia (29%), headache (20%), and decreased appetite (16%). Three percent of modafinil-treated patients and 4% of placebo-treated patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Modafinil film-coated tablets significantly improved ADHD symptoms at school and home as evaluated by clinicians, teachers, and parents. Treatment with once-daily modafinil was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations as a result of adverse events.

Pharmacokinetics of anti-influenza prodrug oseltamivir in children aged 1-5 years.

OBJECTIVE: The prodrug oseltamivir has been shown to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of influenza for patients 1 year of age or older; however, pharmacokinetic information was lacking for children below 5 years of age. This study was conducted to assess the metabolic and excretory capacity of oseltamivir and its active carboxylate metabolite in young children. METHODS: Twelve healthy children aged 1-5 years received a single oral suspension dose of oseltamivir (45 mg for 3-5 years, 30 mg for 1-2 years). Plasma and urine concentrations of oseltamivir and the carboxylate were determined by means of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve values normalized to milligram per kilogram oseltamivir dose in the 1- to 2-year group are lower than those in the 3- to 5-year group. Mean body weight normalized oral clearance of oseltamivir and its carboxylate in younger subjects aged 1-2 years (259 ml/min/kg and 12.2 ml/min/kg) were, respectively, 52% and 30% higher than those in older subjects aged 3-5 years (170 ml/min/kg and 9.4 ml/min/kg). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that infants as young as 1 year old can metabolize and excrete oseltamivir efficiently. The data derived from this study provide the starting dose of oseltamivir for further investigation in an efficacy study among influenza-infected infants less than 1 year of age.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of SLI381 (Adderall XR) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: SLI381 (Adderall XR) is a 2-component extended-release capsule formulation of Adderall designed to produce a therapeutic effect that lasts throughout the day with 1 morning dose. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SLI381 compared with placebo in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children in a naturalistic school and home setting. A secondary objective was to assess the diurnal variation in responses based on morning and afternoon assessments. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 47 sites. After a 1-week washout of any previous stimulant medication, patients were randomized to receive single-daily morning doses of placebo or SLI381 10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg for 3 weeks. Participants aged 6 to 12 years inclusive who satisfied Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria diagnosis of ADHD were included. The primary efficacy parameter was the Conners Global Index Scale for Teachers. Secondary efficacy parameters included the Conners Global Index Scale for Parents, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for improvement, and the Parent Global Assessment for improvement. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events, laboratory tests, and vital signs at each visit during the study. Physical examinations and electrocardiograms were performed at the screening and the end of the study. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-four children were randomized, 563 were included in the intent-to-treat population, and 509 completed the entire study. Intention-to-treat analysis of Conners Global Index Scale for Teachers and Conners Global Index Scale for Parents scores revealed significant improvement in morning, afternoon, and late afternoon behavior for all active treatment groups versus placebo. All active treatment groups showed significant dose-related improvement in behavior from baseline. Both the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for improvement and Parent Global Assessment for improvement showed all doses of SLI381 to be superior to placebo at treatment end and both confirmed the dose-response relationship between improvement and the SLI381 dose. The incidence of spontaneously reported adverse events was low and similar for active treatments and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: SLI381 produced consistent, dose-related improvements on all measures of efficacy. The extended-release nature of the SLI381 formulation was shown by continued, significant improvement in afternoon assessments by teachers and afternoon and late afternoon assessments by parents. The time course and therapeutic effects of SLI381 suggests that this medication is an efficacious once-daily treatment for children with ADHD.