The impact of caesarean scar niche on fertility - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The trend of increasing caesarean section (CS) rates brings up questions related to subfertility. Research regarding the influence of CS on assisted reproduction techniques (ART) is conflicting. A potential mechanism behind CS-induced subfertility is intra uterine fluid resulting from a caesarean scar defect or niche. The vaginal microbiome has been repeatedly connected to negative ART outcomes, but it is unknown if the microbiome is changed in relation to a niche. METHODS: This systematic review describes literature investigating the effect of a niche on live birth rates after assisted reproduction. Furthermore, studies investigating a difference in microbial composition in subfertile persons with a niche compared to no niche are evaluated. Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science were searched on March 2023 for comparative studies on both study questions. Inclusion criteria were i.e., English language, human-only studies, availability of the full article and presence of comparative pregnancy data on a niche. The quality of the included studies and their risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. The results were graphically displayed in a forest plot. RESULTS: Six retrospective cohort studies could be included on fertility outcomes, with a total of 1083 persons with a niche and 3987 without a niche. The overall direction of effect shows a negative impact of a niche on the live birth rate (pooled aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.69) with low-grade evidence. Three studies comparing the microbiome between persons with and without a CS could be identified. CONCLUSION: There is low-grade evidence to conclude that the presence of a niche reduces live birth rates when compared to persons without a niche. The theory that a caesarean has a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes because of dysbiosis promoted by the niche is interesting, but there is no sufficient literature about this.

The increasing number of caesarean deliveries has raised concerns about how it might affect a woman's ability to get pregnant afterwards. Some studies suggest that having a caesarean section (CS) could make it harder to conceive, particularly through in vitro fertilisation (IVF). The reason could be the scar or niche from a previous caesarean. This niche can cause fluid inside the uterus. We also know that the mix of bacteria in the vagina, called the vaginal microbiome, can affect a woman's chances of getting pregnant, especially with treatments like IVF. But we are not sure if having a caesarean affects the vaginal microbiome.To understand this better, van den Tweel's team looked at studies on whether having a niche from a caesarean affects a woman's chance of having a baby through IVF. They also looked at studies comparing the bacteria in the vagina of women who have had a caesarean with those who have not. They found that having a caesarean niche makes it harder for a woman to have a baby through IVF. However, the evidence from these studies is not very strong. We still do not know enough about whether having a caesarean niche affects the bacteria in the vagina.

The Vaginal Microbiome Changes During Various Fertility Treatments.

This study aimed to investigate the influence of hormonal treatment on the vaginal microbiome during fertility treatments. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) could affect fecundity, particularly in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) population, where negative effects on pregnancy outcomes have been reported. It is hypothesized that the hormone treatment during fertility treatments could influence the abundance of Lactobacilli, with negative effects on the pregnancy results. A total of 53 couples attending a fertility clinic in the Netherlands between July 2019 and August 2022 were included in this prospective cohort study. Vaginal samples were collected at start of treatment, oocyte retrieval or insemination from subjects undergoing intra uterine insemination (IUI) with mild ovarian stimulation, and IVF or intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. AmpliSens® Florocenosis/Bacterial vaginosis-FRT qPCR and 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing were performed on all samples. In total, 140 swabs were analyzed, with a median of two swabs per person. 33 (24%) tested qPCR BV positive. Lactobacilli percentage decreased during fertility treatments, leading to changes in the vaginal microbiome. Shannon diversity index was not significantly different. Of the total of 53 persons, nine switched from qPCR BV negative to positive during treatment. The persons switching to qPCR BV positive had already a (not significant) higher Shannon diversity index at start of treatment. If the vaginal microbiome of persons deteriorates during fertility treatments, timing of following treatments, lifestyle modifications, or a freeze all strategy could be of possible benefit.

The relationship between vaginal pH and bacterial vaginosis as diagnosed using qPCR in an asymptomatic subfertile population.

PURPOSE: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiome and a condition found in 20-30% of all women. Literature describing the possible link between BV and subfertility is increasing. Newer techniques such as quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR) detect BV more accurately than traditional methods but come with high costs. The association between pH and BV as diagnosed using traditional methods is well-established in a symptomatic population. This study is the first to investigate the association between pH and BV diagnosed by qPCR in an asymptomatic subfertile population and to examine the usefulness of pH as a means of cost reduction. METHODS: Data of 170 pH-qPCR combinations were used from a prospective cohort study examining bacterial vaginosis in a subfertile population. 102 women received a vaginal swab and pH measurement at baseline and subsequent advanced reproductive technology (ART) treatments. The swabs are analysed using the AmpliSens®Florocenosis/Bacterial vaginosis-FRT qPCR kit. RESULTS: pH is strongly associated with BV as diagnosed by qPCR (OR 3.06, p = 0.000, CI 1.65-5.68). The cut-off point for pH ≥ 4.7 maximised diagnostic performance [AUC 0.74 (CI 0.66-0.83), sensitivity 76%] and reduced costs by 60%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the vaginal pH for a multi-ethnic, asymptomatic population of women attending fertility clinics is strongly associated with BV qPCR outcome. Using the cut-off of pH of 4.7 has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of BV by qPCR and can be achieved at a cost reduction of 60%.

Repeated oral glucose tolerance tests in women at risk for gestational diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women with a negative oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks as part of risk-based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may develop clinical signs or symptoms suggestive for GDM in the third trimester. We aimed to determine the additional yield of repeating an OGTT to detect missed GDM in this group and assess patient characteristics and indications associated with a positive second OGTT. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with a negative OGTT between 24-28 weeks of pregnancy in two hospitals in the Netherlands. Patient characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, OGTT results and indications were compared between women with normal (non-GDM) and abnormal (GDM) results of the second OGTT, using the WHO 1999 criteria (fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or 2 -h post load ≥7.8 mmol/L). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine cut-offs for fasting and 2 -h glucose values of the index OGTT that were associated with a positive OGTT in the third trimester. RESULTS: Of 3147 women at risk for GDM, 183 underwent a second OGTT in the third trimester following their regular OGTT at 24-28 weeks. In 43 women (23.5%) GDM was diagnosed based on the second OGTT. A history of GDM was associated with subsequent GDM diagnosis, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.0-6.3). Both fasting and 2 -h post load glucose values of the index OGTT were significantly higher in women with abnormal OGTT results later in pregnancy. Index OGTT glucose value cut-offs of 4.8 mmol/L (fasting) and 6.5 mmol/L (2 -h) had positive predictive values of 0.32 and 0.47 for a positive OGTT in the third trimester, and negative predictive values of 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. Fetal growth as a clinical symptom for GDM was the most frequent indication for repeating the OGTT, resulting in the diagnosis of GDM in 22.7% of women tested for this indication. CONCLUSION: Repeating an OGTT after initial negative screening results in additional GDM diagnoses. In case of clinical signs, especially in women with additional risk factors such as a history of GDM or higher index OGTT glucose values, repeating an OGTT could be considered.

Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate caesarean section and adverse neonatal outcome rates after induction of labour or expectant management in women with an unripe cervix at or near term. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from two randomised clinical trials. SETTING: Data were collected in two nationwide Dutch trials. POPULATION: Women with hypertensive disease (HYPITAT trial) or suspected fetal growth restriction (DIGITAT trial) and a Bishop score ≤6. METHODS: Comparison of outcomes after induction of labour and expectant management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of caesarean section and adverse neonatal outcome, defined as 5-minute Apgar score ≤6 and/or arterial umbilical cord pH <7.05 and/or neonatal intensive care unit admission and/or seizures and/or perinatal death. RESULTS: Of 1172 included women with an unripe cervix, 572 had induction of labour and 600 had expectant management. We found no significant difference in the overall caesarean rate (difference -1.1%, 95% CI -5.4 to 3.2). Induction of labour did not increase caesarean rates in women with Bishop scores from 3 to 6 (difference -2.7%, 95% CI -7.6 to 2.2) or adverse neonatal outcome rates (difference -1.5%, 95% CI -4.3 to 1.3). However, there was a significant difference in the rates of arterial umbilical cord pH <7.05 favouring induction (difference -3.2%, 95% CI -5.6 to -0.9). The number needed to treat to prevent one case of umbilical arterial pH <7.05 was 32. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that induction of labour increases the caesarean rate or compromises neonatal outcome as compared with expectant management. Concerns over increased risk of failed induction in women with a Bishop score from 3 to 6 seem unwarranted. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Induction of labour at low Bishop scores does not increase caesarean section rate or poor neonatal outcome.

Transfusion policy after severe postpartum haemorrhage: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on quality of life in acutely anaemic women after postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: Randomised non-inferiority trial. SETTING: Thirty-seven Dutch university and general hospitals. POPULATION: Women with acute anaemia (haemoglobin 4.8-7.9 g/dl [3.0-4.9 mmol/l] 12-24 hours postpartum) without severe anaemic symptoms or severe comorbidities. METHODS: Women were allocated to RBC transfusion or non-intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was physical fatigue 3 days postpartum (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scale 4-20; 20 represents maximal fatigue). Non-inferiority was demonstrated if the physical fatigue difference between study arms was maximal 1.3. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life and physical complications. Health-related quality of life questionnaires were completed at five time-points until 6 weeks postpartum. RESULTS: In all, 521 women were randomised to non-intervention (n = 262) or RBC transfusion (n = 259). Mean physical fatigue score at day 3 postpartum, adjusted for baseline and mode of delivery, was 0.8 lower in the RBC transfusion arm (95% confidence interval: 0.1-1.5, P = 0.02) and at 1 week postpartum was 1.06 lower (95% confidence interval: 0.3-1.8, P = 0.01). A median of two RBC units was transfused in the RBC transfusion arm. In the non-intervention arm, 33 women received RBC transfusion, mainly because of anaemic symptoms. Physical complications were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated as the confidence interval crossed the non-inferiority boundary. Nevertheless, with only a small difference in physical fatigue and no differences in secondary outcomes, implementation of restrictive management seems clinically justified.

Labour and neonatal outcome in small for gestational age babies delivered beyond 36+0 weeks: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Small for gestational age (SGA) is associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. At present, evidence on whether these pregnancies should be managed expectantly or by induction is lacking. To get insight in current policy we analysed data of the National Dutch Perinatal Registry (PRN). METHODS: We used data of all nulliparae between 2000 and 2005 with a singleton in cephalic presentation beyond 36+0 weeks, with a birth weight below the 10th percentile. We analysed two groups of pregnancies: (I) with isolated SGA and (II) with both SGA and hypertensive disorders. Onset of labour was related to route of delivery and neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Induction was associated with a higher risk of emergency caesarean section (CS), without improvement in neonatal outcome. For women with isolated SGA the relative risk of emergency CS after induction was 2.3 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.1 to 2.5) and for women with both SGA and hypertensive disorders the relative risk was 2.7 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.1). CONCLUSION: Induction in pregnancies complicated by SGA at term is associated with a higher risk of instrumental deliveries without improvement of neonatal outcome. Prospective studies are needed to determine the best strategy in suspected IUGR at term.

Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of induction of labour with a policy of expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction near term. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised equivalence trial (the Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term (DIGITAT)). SETTING: Eight academic and 44 non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands between November 2004 and November 2008. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women who had a singleton pregnancy beyond 36+0 weeks' gestation with suspected intrauterine growth restriction. INTERVENTIONS: Induction of labour or expectant monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite measure of adverse neonatal outcome, defined as death before hospital discharge, five minute Apgar score of less than 7, umbilical artery pH of less than 7.05, or admission to the intensive care unit. Operative delivery (vaginal instrumental delivery or caesarean section) was a secondary outcome. Analysis was by intention to treat, with confidence intervals calculated for the differences in percentages or means. RESULTS: 321 pregnant women were randomly allocated to induction and 329 to expectant monitoring. Induction group infants were delivered 10 days earlier (mean difference -9.9 days, 95% CI -11.3 to -8.6) and weighed 130 g less (mean difference -130 g, 95% CI -188 g to -71 g) than babies in the expectant monitoring group. A total of 17 (5.3%) infants in the induction group experienced the composite adverse neonatal outcome, compared with 20 (6.1%) in the expectant monitoring group (difference -0.8%, 95% CI -4.3% to 3.2%). Caesarean sections were performed on 45 (14.0%) mothers in the induction group and 45 (13.7%) in the expectant monitoring group (difference 0.3%, 95% CI -5.0% to 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In women with suspected intrauterine growth restriction at term, we found no important differences in adverse outcomes between induction of labour and expectant monitoring. Patients who are keen on non-intervention can safely choose expectant management with intensive maternal and fetal monitoring; however, it is rational to choose induction to prevent possible neonatal morbidity and stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial number ISRCTN10363217.

[Diagnostic image (98). A woman with a vanished intra-uterine device]. / Diagnose in beeld (98). Een vrouw met een verdwenen spiraaltje. IUD in de vrije buikholte door uterusperforatie.

A 36-year-old woman suffered from abdominal pain immediately after placement of an intra-uterine device (IUD). Abdominal X-ray revealed that the IUD had perforated the uterus and lay in the peritoneal cavity.