Defining the canal for ischial and pubic screws in cup revision surgery.

PURPOSE: When revising acetabular cups, it is often necessary to provide additional stabilisation with screws. In extensive defect situations, the placement of screws caudally in the ischium and/or pubis is biomechanically advantageous. Especially after multiple revision operations, the surgeon is confronted with a reduced bone stock and unclear or altered anatomy. In addition, screw placement caudally is associated with greater risk. Therefore, the present study aims to identify and define safe zones for the placement of caudal acetabular screws. METHODS: Forty-three complete CT datasets were used for the evaluation. Sixty-three distinctive 3D points representing bone landmark of interests were defined. The coordinates of these points were then used to calculate all the parameters. For simplified visualisation and intra-operative reproducibility, an analogue clock was used, with 12 o'clock indicating cranial and 6 o'clock caudal. RESULTS: A consistent accumulation was found at around 4.5 ± 0.3 hours for the ischium and 7.9 ± 0.3 hours for the pubic bone. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomy of the ischium and pubis is sufficiently constant to allow the positioning of screws in a standardised way. The interindividual variation is low - regardless of gender - so that the values determined can be used to position screws safely in the ischium and pubis. The values determined can provide the surgeon with additional orientation intra-operatively when placing caudal acetabular screws.

[Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) : Retrospective analysis of a load and go strategy under the aspect of golden hour of eCPR]. / Extrakorporale kardiopulmonale Reanimation (eCPR) bei prähospitalem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand (OHCA) : Retrospektive Analyse einer "Load-and-go"-Strategie unter dem Aspekt "golden hour of eCPR".

BACKGROUND: Survival rates after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain low. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) has been introduced as an attempt to increase survival in selected patients and observational studies have shown promising results. Nevertheless, inclusion criteria and timing of eCPR remain undefined. OBJECTIVE: The current study analyzed a load and go strategy with respect to the golden hour of eCPR as a cut-off time for survival and favorable neurological outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 32 patients who underwent eCPR treatment due to an OHCA between January 2017 and September 2019. Routinely taken patient demographic data (age, BMI, sex) were analyzed. The main focus was set on processing times in the preclinical and clinical setting. Time intervals including OHCA until ambulance arrival, time on scene, transportation times and door to eCPR were extracted from emergency medical service (EMS) and resuscitation protocols. Low-flow times, survival and neurological outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: The use of eCPR in OHCA was associated with survival to hospital discharge in 28% and a good neurological outcome in 19% of the cases. Both groups (survivor and nonsurvivor) did not differ in patient demographics except for age. Survivors were significantly younger (47 (30-60) vs. 59 (50-68) years, p = 0.035). Processing times as well as low-flow times were not significantly different (OHCA-eCPR survivor 64 (50-87) vs. non-survivor 74 (51-85) min; p-value 0.64); however, median low-flow times were outside the golden hour of eCPR (69 (52-86)). CONCLUSION: Despite low-flow times of more than 60 min, eCPR was associated with survival in 28% after OHCA. Hence, exceeding the golden hour of eCPR cannot act as a definitive exclusion criterion for eCPR.