Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Cancer ; 154(11): 1967-1978, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329180

ABSTRACT

Patients with lung cancer under treatment have been associated with a high risk of COVID-19 infection and potentially worse outcome, but real-world data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are rare. We assess patients' characteristics and PROs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in an advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort in Germany. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC from the prospective, multicentre, observational CRISP Registry (NCT02622581) were categorised as pre-pandemic (March 2019 to Feb 2020, n = 1621) and pandemic (March 2020 to Feb 2021, n = 1317). From baseline to month 15, patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed by FACT-L, anxiety and depression by PHQ-4. Association of pandemic status with time to deterioration (TTD) in QoL scales adjusted for potential covariates was estimated using Cox modelling. PROs were documented for 1166 patients (72%) in the pre-pandemic, 979 (74%) in the pandemic group. Almost 60% of patients were male, median age was 66 years, comorbidities occurred in 85%. Regarding HRQoL, mean-change-from-baseline plots hardly differed between both samples. Approximately 15%-21% of patients reported anxiety, about 19%-27% signs of depression. For the pandemic group, TTD was slightly, but statistically significantly, worse for the physical well-being-FACT-G subscale (HR 1.15 [95%CI 1.02-1.30]) and the anxiety-GAD-2 subscale (HR 1.14 [95%CI 1.01-1.29]). These prospectively collected real-world data provide valuable insights into PROs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in advanced NSCLC. For the patients, the pandemic seemed to be less of a burden than the disease itself, as there was a considerable proportion of patients with anxiety and depression in both groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Registries
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 6586, 2023 04 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37085585

ABSTRACT

The establishment of a guideline for long-term noninvasive ventilation treatment (LTH-NIV) of acute hypercapnic exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) requiring acute ventilation has proven elusive. Most studies thus far have shown no mortality benefit of long-term noninvasive ventilation treatment. Using retrospective analysis of the data of our patients (n = 143) recruited from 2012 to 2019, we aimed to compare patients discharged with and without long-term noninvasive ventilation. The follow-up results showed no significant difference (p = 0.233) between the groups [LTH-NIV (n = 83); non-NIV (n = 60)] regarding readmission due to clinical worsening. However, the first- and second-year survival rates were 82% and 72%, respectively, in the LTH-NIV group and significantly different (p = 0.023) from 67 and 55% in the non-NIV group. The statistical models showed a significant mortality risk for the non-NIV group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.82 (1.31; 6.03). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the mortality benefit of long-term NIV therapy for patients with AECOPD under real-world conditions.


Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/etiology , Respiration, Artificial , Lung , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Hypercapnia/therapy
3.
J Crit Care ; 60: 212-217, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871419

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a key component of intensive care treatment; however, this process may be prolonged as some patients require care at specialised centres. Current data indicate that weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation is successful in approximately 65% of patients; however, data on long-term survival after discharge from a weaning centre are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed predictors of survival among 597 patients (392 men, mean age 68 ± 11) post-discharge from a specialised German weaning centre. RESULTS: Complete weaning from mechanical ventilation was achieved in 407 (57.8%) patients, and 106 patients (15.1%) were discharged with non-invasive ventilation; thus, prolonged weaning was successful in 72.9% of the patients. The one-year and five-year survival rates post-discharge were 66.5% and 37.1%, respectively. Age, duration of mechanical ventilation, certain clusters of comorbidities, and discharged with mechanical ventilation significantly influenced survival (p < .001). Completely weaned patients who were discharged with a tracheostomy had a significantly reduced survival rate than did those who were completely weaned and discharged with a closed tracheostomy (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: The identified predictors of survival after prolonged weaning could support therapeutic strategies during patients' intensive care unit stay. Patients should be closely monitored after discharge from a weaning centre.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/methods , Critical Care/methods , Length of Stay , Noninvasive Ventilation/mortality , Ventilator Weaning/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Fever , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Patient Discharge , Survival Rate , Tracheostomy , Ventilator Weaning/methods
4.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 34(4): 833-841, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31342306

ABSTRACT

The recovery of patients after general anesthesia is usually estimated by using clinical scores. Since there is a lack of objective methods for assessing psychomotor recovery, the aim of this study was to evaluate three psychological tests for this purpose. Patients, scheduled for ambulatory gynecological surgery, underwent 3 standard psychological tests before (T1), 15 min after the surgery (T2) and on discharge from the recovery room (T3). The tests used were Wechsler memory scale (test 1, working memory capacity), d2-test (test 2, concentration endurance) and computer-based 4-choice-reaction time (4CRT, test 3, reaction time) as well as Postanesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADSS). The same test battery was used in healthy female volunteers, all test results were compared at the different time points. In 109 patients, working memory capacity and concentration (tests 1 and 2) decreased, the reaction time (test 3) was prolonged at T2 in comparison with T1 and T3 (P < 0.01). PADSS increased from 8 (T2) to 10 (T3) (medians, P < 0.001). Fifty-seven healthy volunteers demonstrated a practice effect in all 3 tests through the course of the study (P <0.01). 4CRT test had shortest duration and enabled computerized data processing. All three tests objectively assess the recovery of psychomotor function in patients after general anesthesia, the computer-based 4CRT seems to be the most convenient for the clinical routine.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthesia, General/instrumentation , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Patient Discharge , Adult , Computers , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Memory, Short-Term , Middle Aged , Perioperative Period , Propofol , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Reaction Time , Recovery Room , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...