Adalimumab therapy for psoriasis in real-world practice: efficacy, safety and results in biologic-naïve vs. non-naïve patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients and the course of treatment in daily practice are different from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to analyse the percentage of patients achieving PASI 75. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: PASI 50, PASI 90, PASI 100 responses, the percentage of patients experiencing at least one serious adverse event (SAE) and the response in biologic-naïve vs. non-naïve patients. METHODS: Prospectively collected efficacy and safety data of a cohort of psoriasis patients treated with adalimumab in daily practice between May 2007 and July 2011 were analyzed. Efficacy was determined using an intention-to-treat analysis and an as treated analysis, in comparison with the course baseline PASI before the start of adalimumab and the original baseline PASI before the start of any biologic therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients received adalimumab therapy with a mean treatment duration of 1.4 (range 0.02-3.1) years. Compared with the original baseline PASI, PASI 75 response rates at week 12 and 24 were 34% and 38% (ITT). PASI 75 responses were well maintained until week 132. Only the PASI 75 response rate at week 12 differed significantly between biologic-naïve (56%) and non-naïve patients (29%). Sixteen patients (19%) experienced 28 SAEs. Seven patients (8%) experienced SAEs considered possibly or probably related to adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, PASI75 responses were substantial but lower than in RCTs and other daily practice studies. Efficacy was well maintained during more than 2 years of follow-up and differed only between biologic-naïve and non-naïve patients at week 12. The incidence of SAEs was low but seems higher than observed in RCTs.

Safety of treatment with biologics for psoriasis in daily practice: 5-year data.

BACKGROUND: The cumulative exposition to biologics is increasing with prolonged treatment with a certain biologic or consecutive biological treatment. However, long-term safety data are limited available. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the 5-year safety of biological treatment for psoriasis in daily practice. METHODS: A cohort of 173 psoriasis patients on biologics was prospectively followed for 5 years. All adverse events reported were documented and analysed. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients reporting at least one serious adverse event. The rate of malignancies, serious infections and serious cardiovascular events was compared with the general population incidence rate. The nature and rate of dermatological adverse events was compared with a group of prospectively followed rheumatoid arthritis patients on TNF-α blocking therapy. RESULTS: Between February 2005 and April 2010, 173 patients were enrolled in the registry and went through a total number of 263 treatment episodes. The total number of patient-years of follow-up in the registry was 409. The number of patient-years was the highest for etanercept. Forty-nine patients (28%) reported 88 serious adverse events. Only one serious adverse event was certainly causally related to the biologic and 21 events (24% of SAEs) were considered possibly related. The incidence of malignancies, serious infections and serious cardiovascular events was comparable with the population incidence rate, except for skin malignancies. The incidence of skin malignancies was significantly higher than the general population incidence rate. The nature and rate of dermatological adverse events differed from the rheumatoid arthritis cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the safety of biological therapies for psoriasis was favourable with a low incidence of therapy-related serious adverse events.

Relevance of laboratory investigations in monitoring patients with psoriasis on etanercept or adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines concerning biological treatment of patients with psoriasis recommend different pretreatment and monitoring laboratory panels in variable frequencies to monitor treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relevance of laboratory investigations in monitoring patients with psoriasis on etanercept or adalimumab. METHODS: A prospective cohort study over 5 years was conducted in all consecutive patients with psoriasis on etanercept or adalimumab. All laboratory investigations performed for monitoring treatment were analysed. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a grade 3 or grade 4 laboratory abnormality. The secondary endpoints were defined as: (i) significant changes in laboratory parameters during etanercept or adalimumab treatment and (ii) the percentage of patients having a laboratory abnormality requiring discontinuation of etanercept or adalimumab treatment. RESULTS: Laboratory parameters were available for 162 patients treated with etanercept and/or adalimumab. The number of treatment episodes was 155 for etanercept and 58 for adalimumab. Follow-up was 316 patient-years for etanercept and 54 patient-years for adalimumab. Thirty-eight of 146 patients treated with etanercept (26%) had one or more grade 3 and/or grade 4 laboratory abnormalities. For adalimumab, this was eight of 58 (14%). These were predominantly considered unrelated to biologic therapy. For both biologics, significant changes were observed in mean laboratory parameters during treatment compared with pretreatment as well as significant trends. However, mean values during treatment remained within normal ranges. Laboratory abnormalities did not lead to permanent discontinuation of biologic treatment in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the incidence of biologic therapy-related serious laboratory abnormalities was low. Our findings do not support a need for routine laboratory testing in patients with psoriasis on etanercept or adalimumab beyond the laboratory testing required for concomitant therapies or comorbidities.

Effectiveness, side-effects and period of remission after treatment with methotrexate in localized scleroderma and related sclerotic skin diseases: an inception cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Detailed information is lacking on effectiveness of methotrexate (MTX) in sclerotic skin diseases, side-effects, and duration of remission after discontinuation. OBJECTIVES: To determine effectiveness, side-effects and period of remission gained by use of MTX in sclerotic skin diseases. METHODS: All patients with a sclerotic skin disease who were treated with MTX (group A) or MTX with corticosteroids (CS) (group B) between 1995 and 2007 were evaluated. Detailed information was collected on dosage and duration of MTX treatment, concomitant immunosuppressive medication and CS treatment, effectiveness, side-effects, duration of the remission period, and time until restart. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (A, n = 47; B, n = 11) were evaluated. Clinical assessment revealed that 38 patients (81%) treated with MTX and 11 patients (100%) treated with MTX + CS showed improvement of sclerotic skin. After one treatment course 51% of the patients treated with MTX and 73% treated with MTX + CS reached remission status with a median follow-up time of 55 and 58 months. Patients showing relapse still responded to a second and even to a third course of MTX. Patients who showed a relapse had received a lower cumulative dose, due to a shorter period of treatment with MTX in the first course. Serious side-effects were seen in six patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: MTX was an effective treatment for various sclerotic skin diseases with a long period of remission and relatively low toxicity. Patients showing relapse still responded to a second and third course of MTX.

Relevance of compartmentalization of T-cell subsets for clinical improvement in psoriasis: effect of immune-targeted antipsoriatic therapies.

BACKGROUND: Therapies targeting the T cell-mediated pathology of psoriasis have been found to achieve remarkable clinical improvement and have confirmed the crucial role of the immune system either in peripheral blood (PB) or in skin. No analyses of T-cell counts in both compartments have been conducted in order to confirm or refute the hypothesized shifts between them. OBJECTIVES: To gain more insight in the dynamics of compartmentalization of T cells between PB and lesional skin of patients with psoriasis, in response to immune-targeted antipsoriatic therapies. METHODS: Eighteen patients with psoriasis received either efalizumab (n = 9) or etanercept (n = 9) for 12 weeks. Biopsies were taken for immunohistochemical analysis of T-cell subsets and simultaneously T-cell subsets were isolated from PB specimens by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index declined significantly after 12 weeks of etanercept, but not for efalizumab. After treatment with efalizumab, a significantly decreased number of all T-cell subsets was found in the dermis. In the epidermis, CD4+, CD8+, CD25+, CD45RO+ and CD161+ T-cell subsets were significantly decreased. With respect to etanercept, few significant changes in T-cell subsets were found. The percentage of lymphocytes in PB was significantly elevated after efalizumab treatment regardless of responder status. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with efalizumab establishes successful recompartmentalization of T-cell subsets with modest clinical efficacy after 12 weeks, whereas in etanercept-treated patients, a significant clinical response is no guarantee for significant changes in T-cell subsets in the different compartments. Reductions in T-cell subsets cannot be used as predictive markers for the clinical response to therapy. Interference with the studied T-cell populations in its own right seems not to be responsible for the clinical efficacy of efalizumab and etanercept.

A double-blind, randomized quantitative comparison of calcitriol ointment and calcipotriol ointment on epidermal cell populations, proliferation and differentiation.

BACKGROUND: Calcitriol and calcipotriol are widely used in the topical treatment of psoriasis. However, studies comparing both treatment modalities are scarce. Especially, there are almost no studies comparing the effects on epidermal cell populations in a quantitative manner. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare the effects of topical calcitriol and topical calcipotriol on clinical scores and epidermal subpopulations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From five patients with stable plaque psoriasis, skin biopsies were taken from two symmetrical regions on the trunk or extremities before and after treatment with either calcitriol or calcipotriol. Frozen sections were labelled immunofluorescently using direct immunofluorescence for beta-1 integrin and the Zenon labelling technique for keratin (K) 6, K10 and K15. The digital photographs of the stained sections were quantitatively analysed and the results of both treatments were compared. RESULTS: The clinical SUM-score improved significantly for both the calcitriol- and the calcipotriol-treated lesions. In the calcipotriol-treated group the expression of K10 and K15 increased and the expression of K6 decreased significantly. No changes were seen for the marker beta-1 integrin. In the calcitriol-treated group none of the markers changed significantly. A tendency towards significance was seen for the changes in the expression of K6 and K15 in favour of calcipotriol. CONCLUSIONS: Both calcitriol and calcipotriol gave a significant improvement in clinical scores. However, treatment with calcipotriol resulted in a normalization of K6, K10 and K15, whereas treatment with calcitriol did not. Comparison of both treatments showed a tendency towards significance for the above-mentioned markers for calcipotriol only.

Monitoring hyperproliferative disorders in human skin: flow cytometry of changing cytokeratin expression.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring dynamics of different cell populations in solid tissues using flow cytometry has several limitations. The interaction and changes in epidermal subpopulations in hyperproliferative skin disorders such as psoriasis, a very common chronic inflammatory skin disease, may, however, elucidate the role of different cell populations in the pathogenesis and the effect of therapy in these disorders. We describe a new, simple method for identifying and quantifying different epidermal subpopulations in hyperproliferative skin disorders and an in vivo model for epidermal hyperproliferation by using six-parameter assessment and three-color flow cytometry. METHODS: Epidermal single-cell suspensions were derived from normal human skin before and after standardized injury and from untreated and treated psoriatic lesions. Samples were stained with anti-cytokeratins 6 (K6) and 10 (K10), anti-vimentin, and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. With three-color flow cytometry, different epidermal subpopulations were further defined by six different parameters. RESULTS: Correlations were found for mild psoriasis and K10(+)K6(-) cells and for moderate psoriasis and K10(-)K6(+) cells. Treatment of mild psoriasis resulted in a 70% increase of the K10(+)K6(-) cells and an 18% decrease of the K10(-)K6(-) cells, whereas treatment of more severe psoriasis resulted in a 77% increase of the K10(+)K6(-) cells and a 33% decrease of the K10(-)K6(+) cells. The tape-stripping model showed changes in suprabasal keratin expression before proliferative activity. CONCLUSIONS: The present flow cytometric assay permits simultaneous quantification of epidermal differentiation, inflammation, proliferation, and hyperproliferation-associated keratinization and provides information on pathogenesis and therapy of hyperproliferative skin disorders.

The dynamic process of apoptosis analyzed by flow cytometry using Annexin-V/propidium iodide and a modified in situ end labeling technique.

BACKGROUND: To study the apoptotic process in time, we used the following flow cytometric (FCM) techniques: phosphatidylserine (PS) translocation by Annexin-V (AnV), DNA fragmentation by in situ end labeling (ISEL), and propidium iodide (PI) staining. Because PS translocation is assumed to be an early feature of programmed cell death (PCD), we questioned if AnV positivity implies inevitable cell death. METHODS: Apoptosis was induced in Jurkat cells by gamma-irradiation, incubation with camptothecin (CPT), or cytosine beta-D-arabinofuranoside (Ara-C). At different time intervals, PCD was quantified by AnV/PI and ISEL. To analyze the influence of cell handling procedures on PCD, we applied these three FCM techniques on CD34+ bone marrow (BM) stem cells after selection and after a freeze-thaw procedure. Various AnV/PI- CD34+ fractions were cultured in a single-cell single-well (SCSW) assay. RESULTS: Jurkat cells under three different detrimental conditions showed essentially the same pattern of apoptosis in time. Initially developed AnV+/PI- cells subsequently (within 1 h) showed ISEL positivity, after which they turned into AnV+/PI++ cells with even higher levels of ISEL positivity (80-90%). Eventually, they lost some of their PI and ISEL positivity and formed the AnV+/PI+ fraction. Cell handling of CD34+ cells caused high and variable AnV+/PI- fractions (overall range 23-62%). Within total AnV+ and AnV+/PI- populations, only a minority of CD34+ cells showed ISEL positivity (range 4-8% and 0.8-6%, respectively). Different fractions of AnV+/PI- CD34+ cells did have clonogenic capacity. CONCLUSIONS: PCD of cell suspensions in vitro can be followed accurately in time by these three FCM techniques. PS translocation is followed rapidly (within 1 h) by oligo-nucleosomal DNA fragmentation, after which cell (and nuclear) membrane leakage occurs. Detection of PS asymmetry by AnV-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) is not always associated with (inevitable) apoptosis, as can be concluded from the proliferative capacity of AnV+ /PI- CD34+ cells in the SCSW assay.