[Direct to consumer genetic testing: is it the moment?]. / La génomique à la demande en accès libre : le moment est-il venu ?

Since the development of new human genome sequencing technologies at the beginning of the 2000, commercial companies have developped direct to consumer genomic services, which means without medical prescription. From 2007 to 2013, many companies have offered services assesing associated risk with human public health in the world especially in the United States. This kind of company is forbidden in France. From 2009 to 2013, in United States, under the pressure of national or state health administrations, these companies have been progressively forbidden. However, in certain parts of the world, companies are still offering such services. The latter raise many different questions such as ethical, juridical, medical, scientific, educative, professional one. Many studies and debates have demonstrated their limit and the lack of usefulness and advantage in the field of human health for the time being. The commercialization of this type of services has arrived all too soon et is not yet ripe. In our time of globalization, with the lack of international rules controlling direct access to genetic services in the field of human health, there is an urgent need to regulate. International administrations and politicians must act fast. Inevitably, under the pressure of lobbies and citizens, companies (multinational or not) will develop especially as 1) new sequencing technologies evolve rapidly, 2) are cheaper from year to year, 3) scientific and medical knowledges are progressing quickly, 4) services are spreading faster through the web and other networks.

[Genomic medicine: the new way of thinking medicine present and future--Part two]. / La médecine génomique, une réalité en pleine évolution Deuxième partie.

New sequencing techniques are revolutionizing medical practice as its applications are numerous and considerable. We are living a technological turning point in molecular medicine. Indeed, thanks to these new machines, this technological leap allowed us to analyse the human genome with an elarged or even a total view. Genome analysis has applications in all medical fields from now on. Gene analysis in parallel with personalized therapy help in prolonged survival or even cures in some cancers or other diseases. Genetics is progressively arriving in every field of clinical practice. A new way of thinking clinics is born. This publication describes in its main lines these new applications, their problems and their challenges for geneticists as much as for other practitioners in the medical fields.

Expertise of French laboratories in detection, genotyping, and quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum.

Before initiating new large-scale therapeutic trials for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, the French Health Authorities for HCV research decided to organize an evaluation of the expertise of laboratories that could be engaged to undertake molecular biology assays in such trials; 21 experienced laboratories participated in this national evaluation of laboratory expertise, which was performed in two successive rounds. The first round evaluated the laboratories for their abilities to detect HCV RNA in serum, determine genotypes, and quantify HCV RNA loads. The results observed by qualitative assays for HCV RNA detection were 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for all laboratories. The genotyping results were 100% concordant for 9 laboratories and greater than 90% for 10 laboratories. By contrast, large coefficients of variation were observed for quantitative determination of HCV RNA loads, leading to a second round with standardized quantitative assays only. The dispersion of the results was larger by the AMPLICOR HCV Monitor assay than by the branched-DNA assay (mean coefficients of variation, 57.4 and 16.9%, respectively). In the majority of cases, discrepancies between the results of the two tests were found for samples with high viral loads. These results indicate the usefulness of validating, by controlling for expertise, both the reliabilities of laboratories involved in multicenter work and the standardized assays chosen for use in the evaluation of the biological impacts of new therapies.