Endovascular thrombectomy after anterior circulation large vessel ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has emerged as the established standard of care for the treatment of anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its benefits remain unclear in specific patient populations. Herein, we present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at thoroughly assessing the effectiveness and safety of combining EVT with medical treatment (MT) compared with MT alone. METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published until December 30, 2023. The inclusion criteria restricted articles to randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We pooled odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs involving 3897 patients were included in the study. EVT plus MT was associated with a significant reduction in disability at 90 days (OR = 1.91, [1.61-2.26]), improved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) (OR = 2.19 [1.81-2.64]), excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.37, [1.45-3.87]), improved independent ambulation (mRS 0-3) (OR = 2.17, [1.75-2.69]), and higher rates of partial/complete recanalization (OR = 2.18, [1.66-2.87] compared with EVT. Efficacy outcomes for both large and small infarct cores were statistically favorable following EVT. Safety outcomes showed comparable rates, except for intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, which favored MT alone. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports the use of EVT plus MT as the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke patients with LVO of any infarct core size, as it offers substantial improvements in functional outcomes and recanalization. Safety considerations, particularly the risk of hemorrhage, warrant careful patient selection. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing stroke management protocols and enhancing patient outcomes.

Acute gastroenteritis-related acute kidney injury in a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) can cause acute kidney injury (AKI) via hypoperfusion mechanisms. Early detection of AKI caused by AGE can significantly decrease mortality rates. In Saudi Arabia, studies investigating the association between AGE and AKI are limited; thus, we aimed to fill this knowledge gap. OBJECTIVES: Analyze all cases of AGE reported in tertiary-care hospitals to assess the prevalence of AKI among AGE patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort SETTINGS: Single tertiary-care center PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients treated for AGE between October 2017 and October 2022. Stool culture was used to diagnose AGE. Inclusion criteria were infective diarrhea and/ or vomiting, and availability of data (demographics, comorbidities, malignancies, length of hospital stay, vital signs at the time of diagnosis, dehydration, causative agents of diarrhea, hemodialysis status, and laboratory data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of AKI among AGE patients and factors associated with development of AKI. SAMPLE SIZE: 300 patients diagnosed with AGE. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients with AGE, 41 (13.6%) had AKI, those older than 60 years were more likely to develop AKI. The most frequent cause of AGE was Salmonella spp. (n=163, 53.3%), whereas AKI was most common in Clostridium difficile AGE patients (n=21, 51.2%). Furthermore, the most common comorbidity in the present study was malignancy, especially leukemia and lymphoma the risk of AKI was independently associated with mild dehydration, higher serum urea concentrations and low GFR values. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for diarrheal disease are at an increased risk of developing AKI due to dehydration and comorbid conditions. It is crucial to keep kidney function in mind for AGE patients as this is associated with a high mortality rate and poor prognosis. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of this study was its retrospective design. Another limitation is that it is limited to a single center. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None.