ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The increase of nickel air pollution is supposed to frequent side effects of nickel action related to virulence potential of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with nickel allergy in atopic dermatitis. The goal was to investigate the relationship between nickel allergy and infection by S. aureus in atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Nickel allergy was confirmed in atopic patients and excluded in healthy volunteers using patch testing. Infection by S. aureus was tested in atopic patients and healthy volunteers by use of API Staph system. The specific IgE for staphylococcal enterotoxin A and B were measured. Secretion of IFN-g, IL-2, IL-13 by PBMC under nickel sulfate and the enterotoxins A and B stimulations were studied with ELISpot. RESULTS: We found the increased number of infections by S. aureus in atopic patients with nickel allergy in comparison to atopic patients and healthy volunteers without nickel allergy. The elevated secretion of IL-2 under nickel sulfate stimulation in vitro was exclusively found in atopic patients with nickel allergy infected by S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that nickel allergy and infection by S. aureus are linked in atopic dermatitis.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/chemically induced , Dermatitis, Atopic/microbiology , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/microbiology , Nickel/adverse effects , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cytokines/metabolism , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Young AdultABSTRACT
The severity of allergic symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) intensifies when the number of colonies patient's of Staphylococcus aureus on patents' skin increases. The basic feature determining the quality of any diagnostic test for S. aureus is its credibility. Performing a test always carries the risk of obtaining false positive and/or false negative results. Furthermore, producing material for microbiological analysis of internal body cavities is sometimes difficult. Therefore, in our study, we compared the results of three tests to determine if their results were mutually compatible and if they confirmed whether S. aureus was present in patients with AD and what was its role in the development of the disease in those patients. Infection with S. aureus was tested in patients with AD and healthy volunteers using the API Staph system. The specific IgE antibodies for staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA) and B (SEB) were measured using the UniCAP system. The secretion of IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-13 by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after stimulation with SEA and SEB were studied with Elispot assay. We found that only certain patients with AD and S. aureus produced antibodies against SEA and SEB in the acute phase of AD. The secretion of IFN-γ was low in patients with exacerbated AD and S. aureus. Testing for the presence of S. aureus in the mucous membrane of the nasal vestibule and skin lesions is not sufficient for complex diagnosis of the role of S. aureus in the pathomechanism of AD. Measuring the presence of antibodies against bacterial components in patients' serum and the reactivity of patients' immune cells against these bacterial components is required in order to accurately diagnose this role of S. aureus in a patient.
