Genetic dissection reveals diabetes loci proximal to the gimap5 lymphopenia gene.

Congenic DRF.(f/f) rats are protected from type 1 diabetes (T1D) by 34 Mb of F344 DNA introgressed proximal to the gimap5 lymphopenia gene. To dissect the genetic factor(s) that confer protection from T1D in the DRF.(f/f) rat line, DRF.(f/f) rats were crossed to inbred BBDR or DR.(lyp/lyp) rats to generate congenic sublines that were genotyped and monitored for T1D, and positional candidate genes were sequenced. All (100%) DR.(lyp/lyp) rats developed T1D by 83 days of age. Reduction of the DRF.(f/f) F344 DNA fragment by 26 Mb (42.52-68.51 Mb) retained complete T1D protection. Further dissection revealed that a 2 Mb interval of F344 DNA (67.41-70.17 Mb) (region 1) resulted in 47% protection and significantly delayed onset (P < 0.001 compared with DR.(lyp/lyp)). Retaining <1 Mb of F344 DNA at the distal end (76.49-76.83 Mb) (region 2) resulted in 28% protection and also delayed onset (P < 0.001 compared with DR.(lyp/lyp)). Comparative analysis of diabetes frequency in the DRF.(f/f) congenic sublines further refined the RNO4 region 1 interval to approximately 670 kb and region 2 to the 340 kb proximal to gimap5. All congenic DRF.(f/f) sublines were prone to low-grade pancreatic mononuclear cell infiltration around ducts and vessels, but <20% of islets in nondiabetic rats showed islet infiltration. Coding sequence analysis revealed TCR Vbeta 8E, 12, and 13 as candidate genes in region 1 and znf467 and atp6v0e2 as candidate genes in region 2. Our results show that spontaneous T1D is controlled by at least two genetic loci 7 Mb apart on rat chromosome 4.

Formation of insulin-positive cells in implants of human pancreatic duct cell preparations from young donors.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Pancreatic ducts are considered as potential sites for neogenesis of beta cells. In vitro studies have reported formation of islets from postnatal human and rodent duct tissue. We examined whether postnatal human duct-cell preparations can generate new beta cells after transplantation. METHODS: Pancreatic duct cells were prepared from the non-endocrine fraction of human donor pancreases that were processed for islet-cell isolation. Grafts containing 0.5 million duct cells with 1% contaminating insulin-positive cells were implanted under the kidney capsule of normoglycaemic nude mice. At 0.5 and 10 weeks post-transplantation, implants were examined for their cellular composition and for the volumes of their composing cell populations, i.e. cytokeratin 19-positive duct cells, synaptophysin-, insulin- and glucagon-positive endocrine cells. RESULTS: Between week 0.5 and 10, duct-cell volume decreased by at least 90% whereas the change in insulin-positive cell volume depended on donor age. Implants from donors over 10 years had a threefold decrease in their insulin-positive cell volume, while those from donors under 10 years had a 2.5-fold increase. After 10 weeks, the implants from the younger donors consisted of 19% insulin-positive cells occurring as single units or small cell clusters. Three percent of these insulin-positive cells also expressed the ductal marker CK 19 and were consistently found in conjunction with ductal epithelia; up to 1% was positive for the proliferation marker BrdU and located in small endocrine cell clusters. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These data indicate that duct cell preparations from donors under 10 years can generate insulin-positive cells. This process might involve differentiation of CK 19-positive-insulin cells that are formed at the duct epithelia as well as proliferation of insulin-positive cells within endocrine cell aggregates.