ABSTRACT
The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects on opioid medication prescribing, patient opioid safety education, and prescribing of naloxone following implementation of a Safer Opioid Prescribing Protocol (SOPP) as part of the electronic health record (EHR) system at a Level I trauma center. This was a prospective observational study of the EHR of trauma patients pre- (n = 191) and post-(n = 316) SOPP implementation between 2014 and 2016. At a comparison Level I trauma site not implementing SOPP, EHRs for the same time period were assessed for any historical trends in opioid and naloxone prescribing. After SOPP implementation, the implementation site increased the use of nonnarcotic pain medication, decreased dispensing high opioid dose (≥100 MME [milligram morphine equivalent]), significantly increased the delivery of opioid safety education to patients, and initiated prescribing naloxone. These changes were not found in the comparison site. Opioid prescribing for acute pain can be effectively reduced in a busy trauma setting with a guideline intervention incorporated into an EHR. Guidelines can increase the use of nonnarcotic medications for the treatment of acute pain and increase naloxone coprescription for patients with a higher risk of overdose.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Clinical Protocols/standards , Multiple Trauma/nursing , Pain/drug therapy , Patient Discharge , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Benchmarking , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Naloxone/administration & dosage , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pain/nursing , Patient Safety , Prospective Studies , Rhode Island , Trauma Centers , Young AdultABSTRACT
An American College of Surgeons-verified Level I pediatric trauma center found that some children with severe and complex injuries experienced disruptions in trauma follow-up care because of the lack of centralized care coordination after hospital discharge. A review of the literature identified little guidance to address this issue. A quality improvement project assessed the gaps in care, identified high-risk patients, and developed a novel pediatric trauma care coordinator (PTCC) nursing position to bridge the gap. Enhancements to the trauma registry software helped create a log of family and provider communication events with and interventions by the PTCC. High-risk patients were defined as those with either a traumatic brain injury plus 1 other organ system injury requiring surgical specialist follow-up, or those with 3 or more different organ system injuries requiring follow-up with a surgical specialist. Costly return to health care (CRH), which we defined as emergency department visits for 72 hr or less or unplanned readmissions of 30 day or less after hospital discharge was selected as the primary outcome measure and assessed during the pre- and postimplementation periods. In the 12-month preimplementation period, 14 patients had a CRH rate of 14%, compared with the 12-month postimplementation period in which 18 patients had a CRH rate of 0%. Patients received a mean of 21.2 communication events and 14.1 intervention events from the PTCC in the postimplementation period. This report details the process of developing and implementing a PTCC nursing position, the tasks involved, and the initial results of this novel program.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/standards , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/nursing , Nursing, Supervisory , Pediatric Nursing , Child , Child Health Services/standards , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Quality Improvement , Rhode Island , Trauma CentersABSTRACT
The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cancer Center is a multidisciplinary cancer center that delivers chemotherapy to 150 to 200 patients daily and adheres to the Oncology Nursing Society and ASCO guidelines for safe chemotherapy administration. An error that occurred at MGH in the summer of 2012 prompted a review of all safety events, the process of classification, and the monitoring of safety events. This article reviews safety monitoring in the oncology setting, details the oncology safety-event reporting program at MGH, summarizes all chemotherapy-related safety events that have occurred over the past 5 years, and concludes with summary recommendations and potential steps to standardize safety reporting and analysis in chemotherapy administration.
Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/standards , Medication Errors , Academic Medical Centers , Humans , Massachusetts , Patient Safety/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Risk Management/methods , Risk Management/standardsABSTRACT
As part of Massachusetts General Hospital's overall quality improvement program, the Massachusetts General Hospital Breast Oncology Program participated in the NCCN Breast Cancer Outcomes Database Opportunities for Improvement Program. A review of concordance to breast oncology quality measures revealed that a small proportion of patients with breast cancer started chemotherapy more than 120 days after diagnosis. Therefore, the research team designed a quality improvement project to increase the percentage of concordance with the ASCO quality measure that requires time to treatment of less than 120 days and to decrease the number weeks from last definitive surgery to first adjuvant chemotherapy by 2014. A multipronged approach of improvements was used: to systems and infrastructure, communication among providers, and recruitment of additional staff as needed. This article describes the project and future initiatives to further improve the quality of breast cancer care at the institution.
