Analytical performance evaluation of the Elecsys Epstein-Barr virus immunoassay panel.

We evaluated the analytical performance of the Elecsys® Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) immunoassay panel for the in vitro detection of EBV immunoglobulin M (IgM), EBV viral capsid antigen immunoglobulin G (VCA IgG), and EBV nuclear antigen immunoglobulin G (EBNA IgG). Relative sensitivity/specificity were assessed using 1,734 human blood samples (1,068 residual samples from routine EBV testing; 467 presumed acute infection; 199 presumed seronegative) tested with the Elecsys EBV and 2 comparator panels (ARCHITECT EBV; Liaison EBV). EBV infection status was defined by majority approach. The three panels demonstrated comparable relative sensitivities/specificities, ranging between values (%) of 98.3-99.5 / 96.9-97.4 (EBV IgM); 96.3-98.4 / 98.4-98.7 (EBV VCA IgG); and 98.1-99.5 / 99.1-99.5 (EBV EBNA IgG). The Elecsys EBV IgM assay demonstrated superior analytical specificity in samples containing potential interferents. Utilizing the Elecsys EBV panel for the EBNA-first approach showed 97.5% overall agreement versus the majority approach in samples with clear EBV status.

"Other minds than ours": a controversial discussion on the limits and possibilities of comparative psychology in the light of C. Lloyd Morgan's work.

C. Lloyd Morgan is mostly known for Morgan's canon (An introduction to comparative psychology, Walter Scott, Limited, London, 1894), still a popular and frequently quoted principle in comparative psychology and ethology. There has been a fair amount of debate on the canon's interpretation, function, and value regarding the research on animal minds, usually referring to it as an isolated principle. In this paper we rather shed light on Morgan's overall scientific program and his vision for comparative psychology. We argue that within his program Morgan identified crucial conceptual, ontological, and methodical issues, that are still fundamental to the current research on animal minds. This also highlights a new aspect of his role as one of the "founding fathers" of modern comparative psychology. In order to understand Morgan's program, we briefly outline the historical context in which he began his work on a science of comparative psychology. We will then emphasize to what extent his taxonomy of psychological capacities, the development of his metaphysics for a comparative psychology, and his newly introduced interdisciplinary procedures justify Morgan's distinctive approach to still rather sensitive issues. In doing so, we aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of Morgan's methodological signature and we contend that a proper understanding of his canon can only be gained by taking it as part of this program. We finally understand his most renown considerations as part of his struggle to ascertain the limits and possibilities of the discipline he contributed to set up, and thus emphasize the need to keep the discussion going, notably on the accessibility of other minds than one's own and on the limits of one's research perspectives.