Management of hospitalized patients with mild to moderate diabetic ketoacidosis using a continuous insulin infusion protocol on a medical surgical ward and observation level of care: A retrospective cohort study.

Although the practice of using rapid-acting subcutaneous insulin for the management of mild-to-moderate diabetic ketoacidosis is becoming increasingly popular, the continuous insulin infusion remains widely utilized, and its real-world applicability and safety on a medical surgical unit (Med Surg) and observation level of care are unclear. We assessed whether a continuous insulin infusion protocol for mild-to-moderate diabetic ketoacidosis on Med Surg/observation level of care over a 6.5-year period was associated with adverse outcomes. A retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with mild-to-moderate diabetic ketoacidosis was conducted at 2 community hospitals in Northern California, USA, from January 2014 to May 2020. Demographic and clinical variables were collected using an electronic health record. Admission to Med Surg/observation was compared to intensive care unit admission for the outcomes of 30-day readmission, presence of hypoglycemia, rate of hypoglycemic episodes, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and length of stay using bivariate analysis. Among 227 hospital encounters (mean age 41 years, 52.9% women, 79.3% type 1 diabetes, 97.4% utilization of continuous insulin infusion), 19.4% were readmitted within 30 days, and 20.7% developed hypoglycemia. For Med Surg/observation encounters compared to the intensive care unit, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of readmission (RR 1.48, 95% CI, 0.86-2.52), hypoglycemia (RR 1.17, 95% CI, 0.70-1.95), or increased length of stay (RR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55-1.02); there was a lower risk of hypoglycemic events during hospitalization (RR 0.69, 95% CI, 0.54-0.96). Continuous insulin infusion utilization may be a safe option for treatment of mild-to-moderate diabetic ketoacidosis on Med Surg/observation level of care. Further investigation is needed.

Sudden-Onset Sensorineural Hearing Loss after Immunization: A Case-Centered Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Case reports of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) following vaccines have led to concerns that vaccines may rarely cause hearing loss. Because of this concern, we analyzed for an association between SSHL and vaccinations. STUDY DESIGN: We used a case-centered method, equivalent to a case control design using immunization dates from all matched members of the population to calculate exposure to vaccines, rather than sampling. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), 2007 to 2013. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We searched KPNC databases from 2007 to 2013 for all first-time diagnoses of SSHL. We used the date of any hearing- or ear-related visit in the 60 days prior to the first SSHL diagnosis as the onset date. Using only SSHL cases immunized in the prior 9 months, we compared the vaccine exposure in several risk intervals prior to onset with the exposure to the same vaccine during the same time period in all KPNC membership, matched to sex and age. RESULTS: During the study period, >20 million vaccines were administered at KPNC. In all risk intervals prior to onset of SSHL, we found no evidence of increased risk of immunization compared with matched controls. The odds ratios for vaccination 1 week prior to SSHL were 0.965 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.50) for trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV); 0.842 (0.39-1.62) for tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and reduced acellular pertussis; and 0.454 (0.08-1.53) for zoster vaccine. CONCLUSION: A large-scale analysis applying a case-centered method did not detect any association between SSHL and previous receipt of TIV or other vaccines.

Interdisciplinary treatment for vestibular dysfunction: the effectiveness of mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and vestibular rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an interdisciplinary program for vestibular patients improved health outcomes and health care utilization. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Outpatient neurotology clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 167) with dizziness attended an interdisciplinary neurotology clinic; 129 were offered group treatment. After an introductory session, group treatment included 5 sessions incorporating mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and vestibular rehabilitation. Physical and emotional functioning, depression,anxiety, dizziness, impairment, coping, skill use, and patient satisfaction were measured with rating scales pre- and post-group treatment. Data from 51 patients (male/female = 14/37; age range, 25-82 years) were analyzed with paired t tests or nonparametric tests. Logistic regression analyzed predictors of outcome and utilization for 116 patients (male/female = 81/35; age range, 11-86 years) attending the interdisciplinary clinic, introductory session, and/or group. RESULTS: After group treatment, patients reported better mood (P = .0482); better physical (P = .0006) and mental (P = .0183) health; better functionality, coping, and skill use (Ps< .0001); less impairment (P < .0001); and fewer limitations from dizziness (P < .0001). Higher pretreatment levels of depression (P = .0216), poorer initial mental (P = .0164) or physical (P = .0059) health, and peripheral diagnosis (P = .0220) predicted better outcome. Group treatment decreased utilization more than the interdisciplinary clinic with (P = .0183) or without (P = .0196) the introductory session; 78% of patients with any level of participation showed less utilization. Clinic patients had fewer radiology procedures than group patients (P = .0365). Patients were highly satisfied with the program and found it more effective than previous treatment. CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary treatment improves patient coping, functionality, and satisfaction and decreases overall health care utilization in vestibular patients.