DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib vaccine (Hexaxim): an update 10 years after first licensure.

INTRODUCTION: Hexaxim® is fully liquid, hexavalent, combination vaccine that provides immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, hepatitis B, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Combination vaccines such as Hexaxim reduce the number of injections needed, improving both vaccination compliance and operational efficiency. AREAS COVERED: Safety and immunogenicity data were reviewed from >25 clinical trials involving approximately 7200 infants/toddlers, identified using PubMed searches to April 2023. These trials have evaluated a diverse range of primary series and booster schedules, including antibody persistence, co-administration of Hexaxim with other routine pediatric vaccines, and specific populations (born to Tdap-vaccinated women, preterm, and immunocompromised infants). Lastly, post-marketing surveillance and real-world effectiveness data were assessed. EXPERT OPINION: An extensive program of clinical development prior to licensure demonstrated favorable vaccine safety and good immunogenicity of each antigen, and Hexaxim was first approved for use in 2012. In the 10 years since licensure, Hexaxim has been adopted widely, with more than 180 million doses distributed worldwide. The widespread use of this hexavalent vaccine is a crucial tool in the ongoing and future control of six pediatric infectious diseases globally.

Vaccination in pregnancy against pertussis and seasonal influenza: key learnings and components from high-performing vaccine programmes in three countries: the United Kingdom, the United States and Spain.

BACKGROUND: Pertussis and seasonal influenza are responsible for significant maternal, neonatal, and infant morbidity and mortality, but vaccine coverage rates (VCR) for both pertussis (administered as a tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis [Tdap] vaccination) and seasonal influenza in pregnancy remain generally low. Only a small number of countries, including Spain, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US), have high Tdap and seasonal influenza VCRs in pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to identify the key factors that contributed to the high VCRs observed in these countries. METHODS: The experience from both Tdap and seasonal influenza vaccination programmes during pregnancy were documented in Spain, the UK, and the US using a three-step approach. A literature review yielded 157 publications, and a further 117 documents were selected through desk research. A published five-pillar VCR framework for influenza was amended to evaluate the specific contributing factors leading to high Tdap and seasonal influenza VCRs among pregnant women. RESULTS: The analysis identified components that contributed to higher VCR in pregnant women across three different healthcare systems in Spain, UK, and US. The combination of several key interventions in each country led to a rapid increase in VCR that reached near-optimal levels (i.e. 75% for seasonal influenza) within a few years. As well as inclusion in national immunisation programme and vaccine reimbursement, key components that were identified included the mobilisation of health authorities, prenatal care Healthcare Professionals (HCP) and scientific societies, the inclusion of vaccination in antenatal medical guidance, the provision of educational material to HCPs, and a strong disease awareness driven by recent pertussis outbreaks in each country. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no simple, universal solution to improving sub-optimal VCRs, the list of components identified in this study from three countries with high-performing Tdap and seasonal influenza vaccination programmes provides a basis for public health and medical stakeholders in other countries to define strategies to successfully implement national vaccination programmes for pregnant women.

Randomized clinical trial of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib vaccine administered concomitantly with meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines during the primary infant series.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant administration of vaccines simplifies delivery. DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib is a fully liquid, combination vaccine against 6 diseases. This study evaluated the compatibility of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib with 2 different meningococcus group C conjugate (MCC) vaccines in infants. METHODS: In a phase 3, open-label study, 284 healthy infants from 11 UK centres received DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib at age 2, 3, and 4 months; 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) at 2 and 4 months; a Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-MCC vaccine and a measles/mumps/rubella vaccine at 12 months. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive either an MCC-detoxified tetanus toxin vaccine (MCC-TT; n = 141) or an MCC-Corynebacterium diphtheriae CRM197 protein vaccine (MCC-CRM; n = 143) at 3 and 4 months. The primary outcome was seroprotection rate (SPR) to MCC (percent with rabbit complement serum bactericidal antibody titer ≥8). RESULTS: Per protocol analysis, MCC SPRs were 100 and 96.4 one month after the first dose, 100 and 99.1 after the second dose, and 100 and 97.3 after the third (booster) dose of MCC in the MCC-TT and MCC-CRM groups, respectively. One month after all 3 doses of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib, immunoglobulin G anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate SPRs (% ≥0.15 µg/mL) were 97.8 in the MCC-TT group and 100 in the MCC-CRM group; anti-hepatitis B antigen SPRs (% ≥10 mIU/mL) were 96.8 and 96.3 in the MCC-TT and MCC-CRM groups, respectively. All participants were seroprotected against diphtheria and tetanus (≥0.01 IU/mL) and poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 (≥8 dilution), and seroresponse rates to all pertussis antigens were ≥90.4%. Two vaccine-related serious adverse events (transient severe abdominal pain and crying) occurred concomitantly in 1 participant in the MCC-CRM group. Adverse event rates were similar to other studies of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib, with pyrexia ≥38 °C in 10.9% of participants following any dose. CONCLUSIONS: DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib can be effectively used in a 2-, 3-, and 4-month infant priming schedule when given with 2 doses of MCC.

Concomitant administration of a fully liquid ready-to-use DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T hexavalent vaccine with a meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine in toddlers.

Invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis is a life-threatening disease. Several countries now include meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) conjugate and, more recently, a meningococcal serogroup ACWY conjugate (MenACWY) vaccination in their national immunization schedules. DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T is a hexavalent vaccine that provides protection against six diseases. The phase III, open-label, randomised, multicentre study enrolled healthy toddlers who received the DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine (at 2, 3 and 4 months) with or without a MenC vaccine (at 2 and 4 months) in the primary series study. At 12 months of age, 312 toddlers were randomised to receive DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T co-administered with MenACWY-TT vaccine (Group A; n = 104); DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine alone (Group B; n = 105); or MenACWY-TT vaccine alone (Group C; n = 103). At 12 months of age, there were no notable differences in terms of antibody persistence for any DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine antigen, whether MenC-TT conjugate vaccine was co-administered or not during the primary series. Following booster vaccination, immune responses to DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T and MenACWY-TT vaccines were not affected by co-administration. One month after vaccination, the immune responses elicited by both vaccines were high, whether administered concomitantly or separately. The administration of MenC vaccine during infancy did not preclude the use of a MenACWY-TT vaccine for booster vaccination. Even though the reactogenicity after co-administration was somewhat higher, the results of this study support the concomitant administration of the DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine with a MenACWY-TT conjugate vaccine when given from 12 months of age. The clinical trial registration numbers are: clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01839175; EudraCT: 2012-005547-24.

Immunogenicity and safety of a new hexavalent vaccine (DTaP5-IPV-HB-Hib) administered in a mixed primary series schedule with a pentavalent vaccine (DTaP5-IPV-Hib).

DTaP5-IPV-HB-Hib vaccine is a fully-liquid, combination hexavalent vaccine. This phase III, open-label, multicentre study conducted in Spain, evaluated the immune response to all DTaP5-IPV-HB-Hib antigens when the vaccine was used in a mixed hexa/penta/hexa primary series. Infants (who had received one dose of hepatitis B vaccine at birth) received a mixed schedule including DTaP5-IPV-HB-Hib (PRP-OMP conjugate) at 2 and 6months of age, DTaP5-IPV-Hib at 4months, meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccine at 2 and 4months, and routine rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccination. One month post-dose 3 of the mixed schedule, response rates were considered acceptable if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval around the post-vaccination response rate was >90% for hepatitis B and >80% for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). Secondary immunogenicity objectives included description of the antibody response to all hexavalent antigens one month after completion of the mixed schedule, and to MCC antigen one month after the second MCC dose. The safety profile after each dose of study vaccine was described. Of 385 healthy infants enrolled, 384 completed the study. The primary objective was achieved for both hepatitis B and Hib; the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI of the response rates (97.2% and 99.0%, respectively) were greater than the pre-specified acceptability thresholds. One month post-dose 3 of the mixed schedule, all participants were seroprotected against diphtheria, tetanus and polio. The mixed schedule induced a robust immune response to all hexavalent antigens. The co-administration of the hexavalent vaccine in a mixed schedule with MCC vaccine did not reduce the immune response to vaccine antigens. Vaccines were well tolerated. In conclusion, the acceptability of response rates against Hib and hepatitis B were demonstrated one month post-dose 3 of the mixed schedule; robust immune responses against all other hexavalent antigens were observed. clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01839188; EudraCT: 2012-004221-25.

Concomitant administration of a fully liquid, ready-to-use DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T hexavalent vaccine with a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine in infants.

DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T or hexavalent vaccines are indicated for primary and booster vaccination of infants and toddlers against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). The present study evaluates the safety and immunogenicity of a ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine when co-administered with a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MenC) vaccine in infants. This was a phase III, open-label, randomised, multicentre study conducted in Finland. Healthy infants, aged 46-74days (n=350), were randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to receive DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine at two, three and four months, either with a MenC vaccine co-administered at two and four months (Group 1; n=175) or without MenC vaccine (Group 2; n=175). All infants also received routine rotavirus and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. The proportion of participants with an anti-HBs concentration ⩾10mIU/mL assessed one month after the third dose of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine was 97.5% [95%CI: 93.1-99.3] in the coadministration group and 96.1% [95%CI: 91.8-98.6] in the group without MenC vaccine. The proportion of participants with an anti-MenC SBA titre ⩾8 assessed one month after the second dose of MenC vaccine was 100% in the coadministration group. Both primary objectives were achieved. Secondary immunogenicity and safety analyses showed that co-administration of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T and MenC vaccines did not impact the immune response to the antigens of each of the two vaccines. All vaccines were well tolerated and the safety profile of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine was similar in both groups. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01839175; EudraCT number: 2012-005547-24.

DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB, a hexavalent vaccine for infants and toddlers.

INTRODUCTION: Combination vaccines reduce the 'shot burden' and simplify the childhood immunization schedule. Only 5-valent DTaP-based vaccines are licensed in the U.S. Areas covered: A new combination vaccine - DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB - is described, which induces antibody responses in infants (given in different schedules, including a 2, 4, and 6-month schedule) that are similar to the respective component vaccines. The vaccine appears to be safe and would be expected to protect against six diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, H influenzae type b, and polio. Administration is associated with higher rates of mild fever, but without significant safety signals. Expert commentary: Incorporation of this hexavalent vaccine into the U.S. schedule could improve coverage rates and timeliness, and addition to the E.U. market would add depth to the available repertoire of combination vaccines.

A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine Given at Two, Three, Four and Twelve Months.

BACKGROUND: Combination vaccines simplify vaccination visits and improve coverage and timeliness. Diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis 5, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib) is a new investigational, fully liquid, combination vaccine containing a 5-antigen pertussis component and is designed to protect against 6 infectious diseases. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, comparator-controlled, phase III study (NCT01341639) conducted in Finland, Germany and Belgium, healthy infants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 of 2 immunization regimens. The DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib group received the investigational hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-HB-IPV-Hib) and the Control group received Infanrix-hexa (DTPa3-HBV-IPV/Hib) at 2, 3, 4 and 12 months of age. Both groups received concomitantly Prevnar 13 (PCV13) and Rotateq (RV5) at 2, 3 and 4 months of age and ProqQad (MMRV) at 12 months of age. MMRV was also administered to all study subjects at 13 months of age. RESULTS: A total of 628 subjects in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib group and 622 subjects in the Control group were randomized. In a per-protocol analysis, immune responses to vaccine antigens 1 month after dose 3 and after the toddler dose were noninferior in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib group as compared with the Control group. The DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib group responses to MMRV given concomitantly at 12 months were all noninferior compared with the Control group. Solicited adverse event rates after any dose, including fever, were similar in both groups. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate and did not lead to subject withdrawal. Vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred infrequently in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib group (0.3%) and the Control group (0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib is comparable to Control when administered in the 2-month, 3-month, 4-month and 12-month schedule. DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib has the potential to provide a new hexavalent option for pediatric combination vaccines, aligned with recommended immunizations in Europe.

A Phase III randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of an investigational hexavalent vaccine given at 2, 4, and 11-12 months.

BACKGROUND: Combination vaccines simplify vaccination visits and improve coverage and timeliness. DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib is a new investigational, fully-liquid, combination vaccine designed to protect against 6 infectious diseases, including 5 pertussis antigens and OMPC instead of PT as conjugated protein for Hib component. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, comparator-controlled, Phase III study (NCT01480258) conducted in Sweden, Italy, and Finland, healthy infants were randomized 1:1 to receive one two immunization regimens. The DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group received the investigational hexavalent vaccine (DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib) and the Control Group received Infanrix-hexa (DTPa3-HBV-IPV/Hib) at 2, 4 and 11-12months of age. Both groups received concomitantly Prevnar 13 (PCV13) and Rotateq (RV5) or Rotarix (RV1) at 2, 4months of age and PCV13 at 11-12months. Subjects administered RV5 received a 3rd dose at 5months of age. RESULTS: A total of 656 subjects were randomized to the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group and 659 subjects to Control Group. Immune responses to all vaccine antigens post-toddler dose were non-inferior in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group as compared to the Control Group. Additionally, the post-dose 2 and pre-toddler DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib anti-PRP responses were superior. The DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group responses to concomitant RV1 were non-inferior compared to the Control Group. Solicited adverse event rates after any dose were similar in both groups, except for higher rates of pyrexia (6.4% difference; 95% CI: 1.5,11.3) and somnolence (5.8% difference; 95% CI: 1.7,9.8) in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group. Vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred infrequently in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group (0.3%) and the Control Group (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib is generally comparable to Control when administered in the 2, 4, 11-12month schedule. Early Hib responses were superior versus Control. DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib could provide a new hexavalent option for pediatric combination vaccines, aligned with recommended immunizations in Europe. STUDY IDENTIFICATION: V419-008 CLINICALTRIALS.GOV identifier: NCT01480258.

Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of the immunogenicity and safety of a fully liquid combination diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-five-component acellular pertussis (DTaP5), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), and haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine compared with a DTaP3-IPV/Hib vaccine administered at 3, 5, and 12 months of age.

This study compared the levels of immunogenicity and safety of diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-five-component acellular pertussis (DTaP(5)), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib) and DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib vaccines for study participants 3, 5, and 12 months of age. Post-dose 3 noninferiority criteria comparing DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib to DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib using rates of seroprotection were demonstrated against diphtheria, tetanus, and polio types 1 to 3, but not for polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP). While PRP did not meet noninferiority criteria, the seroprotection rate and geometric mean concentration (GMC) were high, indicating a clinically robust immune response. GMCs or titers for other antigens (including pertussis) and the safety profiles were generally similar between groups. Fully liquid DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib can be administered using the 3-, 5-, and 12-month vaccination schedule. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00287092.).

Safety and immunogenicity of fully liquid DTaP5-IPV-Hib pediatric combination vaccine (Pediacel®) compared to DTaP3-HBV-IPV/Hib (Infanrix® Hexa) when coadministered with heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) as a booster at 11-18 months of age: a phase III, modified double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

This study compared the safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-IPV-Hib vaccine (followed by monovalent hepatitis B vaccine [HBV]) and DTaP3-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccines, both coadministered with PCV7, as a fourth-dose booster in toddlers 11-18 months who had a hexavalent vaccine primary series. The fever rate within 4 days of DTaP5-IPV-Hib was noninferior to DTaP3-HBV-IPV/Hib. DTaP5-IPV-Hib induced a marked immune response and had a similar safety and immunogenicity profile compared with DTaP3-HBV-IPV/Hib. Fully liquid DTaP5-IPV-Hib can be used as a booster after a hexavalent vaccine primary series; where required, a fourth dose of monovalent HBV can be administered after DTaP5-IPV-Hib (NCT ID: NCT00355654).

Immunogenicity and safety of fully liquid DTaP5-IPV-Hib compared with DTaP3-IPV/Hib when both coadministered with a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) at 2, 3, 4, and 12 to 18 months of age: a phase III, single-blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre study.

This study compared immunogenicity and safety of DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib to DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib coadministered with PCV7 at 2, 3, and 4 months (primary series) and a fourth-dose booster at 12-18 months of age. Seroprotection rates for DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib were high (noninferior to DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib for the primary series) for antigens common to both vaccines and PCV7 antigens. Geometric mean concentration (GMC) for Hib antibodies were higher in the DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib group than the DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib group after the primary series and booster dose; GMCs or titers for other antigens were generally similar between groups after the primary series and booster dose. Safety profiles were similar between groups.

Antibody persistence in UK pre-school children following primary series with an acellular pertussis-containing pentavalent vaccine given concomitantly with meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine, and response to a booster dose of an acellular pertussis-containing quadrivalent vaccine.

This open-label, randomised, controlled study examined antibody persistence following infant vaccination at 2, 3 and 4 months of age with either an acellular pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b (DT(5)aP-IPV-Hib; Pediacel) or a whole-cell pertussis (DTwP//Hib+oral poliomyelitis vaccine [OPV]) combination vaccine, given concomitantly with meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccine, followed by a Hib booster at approximately 15 months of age. Immune responses were sustained to 3.5-4.5 years of age for all antigens contained in Pediacel. Administration of an acellular pertussis-containing quadrivalent pre-school booster (Td(5)ap-IPV; Repevax), with or without measles, mumps and rubella (M-M-RII) vaccine, induced robust antibody responses indicative of protection, regardless of the vaccine used for the primary series. Reactogenicity of Repevax was acceptable and consistent with previous experience.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a combined adsorbed tetanus toxoid, low dose diphtheria toxoid, five component acellular pertussis and inactivated polio vaccine in six-year-old children.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the combined adsorbed tetanus toxoid, low dose diphtheria toxoid, 5-component acellular pertussis and inactivated polio vaccine (TdcP-IPV) as compared with a pediatric dose diphtheria formulation, combined with adsorbed tetanus toxoid and 3-component acellular pertussis (DTacP), in 6-year-old children who were immunized with 4 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell cellular pertussis (DTwcP) plus oral polio vaccine (OPV) before 2 years of age, according to the local Spanish vaccination calendar. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four healthy 6-year-old children were randomized to receive 1 dose of TdcP-IPV or 1 dose of DTacP and OPV. RESULTS: One month postvaccination, antidiphtheria and antitetanus titers were > or =0.1 IU/mL in 100% of patients in both study groups. TdcP-IPV reached 100% seroprotection rates against polio types 1, 2 and 3. In OPV recipients, these rates were 100, 100 and 96.8%, respectively. Seropositivity rates for pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin and fimbrial components of the TdcP-IPV vaccine were 97.9, 89.6, 90.6 and 100%. The incidence of local and systemic reactions was 50.5 and 39.2% in the TdcP-IPV group and 59.4 and 38.5% in the DTacP plus OPV group, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: TdcP-IPV vaccine was shown to be immunogenic and safe when given as a booster in children 6 years of age who were primed with 4 doses of DTwcP and OPV.

Persistence of antibodies at 5-6 years of age for children who had received a primary series vaccination with a pentavalent whole-cell pertussis vaccine and a first booster with a pentavalent acellular pertussis vaccine: immunogenicity and tolerance of second booster with a tetravalent acellular vaccine at 5-6 years of age.

UNLABELLED: The main objective of this study was to assess in 5-6-year-old French children (n=162) the persistence of antibodies induced by a primary series vaccination (at 2-4 months of age) with a pentavalent whole-cell pertussis combined vaccine (DTwcP-IPV-Hib; Pentacoq) and a first booster (at 12-16 months of age) with a pentavalent two-component acellular pertussis combined vaccine (DTacP-IPV-Hib; Pentavac). The second objective was to evaluate in these 5-6-year-old French children the safety and the immunogenicity of a tetravalent pertussis combined vaccine (DTacP-IPV, Tetravac) given as a second booster. RESULTS: before the 2nd booster, more than 90% of children had antibody titers above the defined threshold for polyribosyl ribitol phosphate (PRP), tetanus, diphtheria and poliomyelitis; antibody titers were very low for pertussis. One month after the second booster, all children had sero-protective post-booster titers for tetanus, diphtheria and poliomyelitis types 1-3; over 90% of children had a four-fold rise in titers against DTacP-IPV antigens. Adverse events were mostly solicited reactions, with no serious adverse event. A strong anamnestic response was also observed after the second booster injection with Tetravac, with a satisfactory safety profile. CONCLUSION: Pentavac and Tetravac (acellular pertussis containing vaccines) may thus be administered as first and second boosters respectively, in children primed with Pentacoq (whole-cell pertussis containing vaccine).

Antibody persistence against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) in 5-6-year-old children after primary vaccination and first booster with a pentavalent combined acellular pertussis vaccine: immunogenicity and tolerance of a tetravalent combined acellular pertussis vaccine given as a second booster.

UNLABELLED: The main objective of this study was to assess in 5-6-year-old French children (n=234) the persistence of antibodies induced by a primary series vaccination (at 2-4 months of age) and a first booster (at 12-16 months of age) with a pentavalent two-component acellular pertussis combined vaccine (DTacP-IPV-Hib; Pentavac). The second objective was to evaluate in these 5-6-year-old French children the safety and the immunogenicity of a tetravalent acellular pertussis combined vaccine (DTacP-IPV; Tetravac) given as second booster. RESULTS: Seroprotective antibody levels against diphtheria, tetanus, types 1-3 poliomyelitis and PRP were maintained 4-5 years after primary-vaccination and first booster with Pentavac. As expected, anti-PT antibodies levels were low, suggesting that children were not colonised by Bordetella pertussis. The second booster with Tetravac was well tolerated and elicited a strong booster response for all antigens. CONCLUSION: acellular pertussis combined vaccine, used in primary-vaccination, could be considered as having the same priming effect and the same efficacy as whole cell pertussis vaccine.