[Interest of multidisciplinary consultation meetings dedicated to endometriosis: From a series of 682 patients]. / Intérêt des réunions de concertation pluridisciplinaires dédiées à l'endométriose : à partir d'une série de 682 patientes.

OBJECTIVE: We decided to conduct a study based on these multidisciplinary team (MDT) in order to investigate their impact at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg and look for ways to improve this MDT. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of the 682 patients presented to endometriosis MDT from its inception in March 2017 to December 2020. RESULTS: The MDT decision was different from that initially proposed by the patient's referent for 406 patients (60%). Surgery was chosen for 417 patients (61%) and assisted reproduction for 261 patients (38%). A review of the MRI by a referring radiologist was carried out for 348 cases (51%), with a modification of the results for 255 patients (73%). Initial underestimation of lesions was noted in 198 cases. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown the importance of MDT in endometriosis since the therapeutic proposal was modified in 60% of cases. In addition, we supported the importance of radiologists specializing in this field since they made a modification in two-thirds of the MRIs reread. These results show the importance of collegial discussions, which can modify the decisions of medical teams. This underlines the importance of setting up endometriosis networks.

Urological procedures performed by gynecologists: Activity profile in a gynecological surgery department, 10-year observation cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The proximity of the urinary tract to the female genital tract explains its possible involvement in pelvic gynaecological cancer or deep endometriosis. Surgical treatment is aimed at improving overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients, as well as restoring normal anatomy and functional integrity depending on the pathology. These operations are accompanied by significant post-operative complications. Thus, the urological procedures performed must be rigorously justified, and the different resection and reconstruction techniques adapted to the pathology and the level of infiltration. OBJECTIVE: To describe the activity profile, over the last ten years, of a gynaecological surgery department in terms of urological procedures in the management of patients with deep endometriosis and pelvic carcinology. STUDY DESIGN: This is a monocentric retrospective observational study, including all patients who underwent a urological procedure by a gynaecological surgeon only, as part of the management of pelvic gynaecological cancers or deep endometriosis, at the University Hospital Centre (CHU) of Strasbourg, between January 1st 2010 and April 31st 2021. The variables studied were early postoperative complications, the rate of surgical reintervention, operating time, length of hospital stay, the need for peri-operative drainage or transfusion, and post-operative functional disorders. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were included, 27 in the pelvic gynaecological cancer group and 59 in the deep endometriosis group. 61.6% of patients received uretero-vesical catheterization, 60.5% partial cystectomy, 10.5% psoic bladder ureteral reimplantation, and 3.5% trans-ileal Bricker skin ureterostomy. The mean operating time was 316 min in the pelvic gynaecological cancer group and 198.9 min in the deep endometriosis group. The average hospital stay was 11.5 days, 22.3 days for patients treated for pelvic cancer and 6.3 days for those treated for endometriosis. The rate of minor post-operative complications was 8.2% of cases, and major post-operative complications 17.4% of cases, the majority of which were in the gynecological cancer group. There were no cases of intra- or early post-operative death. Early postoperative urinary complications affected 14.0% of the total patients, mostly in the gynaecological cancer group with 33.3% of patients, but only 5.1% of patients in the deep endometriosis group. The total reoperation rate within 60 days postoperatively was 15.1%, 40.7% for patients treated for gynaecological cancer and 3.4% for those treated for deep pelvic endometriosis. The rate of reoperations for urinary complications was 11.6% of total patients, or 76.9% of total reoperations. 15 patients received labile blood products intra- or postoperatively, 11 in the pelvic gynaecological cancer group and 4 in the endometriosis group. CONCLUSION: Our overall results appear comparable to those reported in the literature and are particularly satisfactory in terms of post-operative complications after partial cystectomy in the management of deep endometriosis compared to other gynaecological departments. This work encourages us to continue and improve the training of gynaecological surgeons in terms of multidisciplinary surgical procedures, including urological ones, to obtain a global vision of the pathology and to allow an optimal quality of care for the patients.

Vaginal and laparoscopic sub-urethral sling explantation.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to describe the different laparoscopic and vaginal steps of sub-urethral infected mesh explantation as well as an unexpected and unusual complication: a sub-mucosal calcification on the sub-urethral segment of the sling that was not infiltrating the urethra. METHODS: This was carried out at our University Teaching Hospital of Strasbourg. RESULTS: We show the complete removal of an infected retropubic sling in a patient who had already undergone three previous surgeries without resolution of symptoms. This is a difficult case requiring a laparoscopic approach of the space of Retzius, which has been less familiar to surgeons since the advent of the midurethral sling. We show how to approach this space in an inflammatory environment by specifying its anatomical limits. Moreover, a great deal can be learned from the occurrence of an infectious complication after the surgery and the presence of a large calcification on the prosthesis. In this context, we advise a systematic antibiotic treatment to avoid this kind of complication. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the guidelines and the different surgical steps will help urogynecological surgeons to perform similar procedures in patients requiring removal of retropubic slings for complications such as infection and pain, where conservative management has not been successful. These cases must be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting, as recommended by the French National Authority for Health, and managed in an expert establishment.

Deep infiltrating endometriosis: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing surgery and use of neutral argon plasma.

OBJECTIVE: To present a minimally approach to the management of deep pelvic endometriosis by nerve-sparing surgery and use of neutral argon plasma for extensive endometriotic lesions. DESIGN: This is a clinical case video of a 29 years-old patient, affected by deep pelvic endometriosis with primary dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain and dyschezia. Pelvic MRI shows a right ovarian endometrioma measuring 5 cm, a thickening of the right uterosacral ligament and a uterine torus nodule. SETTING: Laparoscopy video. INTERVENTION: This laparoscopic surgery begins by an adhesiolysis of the sigmoid and a blue tube test to check the correct permeability of the tubes. A bilateral ureterolysis is performed before the excision of a torus lesion and adhesiolysis of the rectovaginal septum. A fine dissection of the uterosacral ligament by nerve-sparing surgery is realized to respect the hypogastric nerve in the Okabayashi space. Endometriosis nodules of the lumbo-ovarian ligaments and multiples endometriosis peritoneal implants, inaccessible to a complete excision, are destroyed by argon plasma vaporization. A cystectomy of the right endometrioma and an appendectomy are performed at the end. CONCLUSION: The surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis is complex, with the recent contribution of new technical procedures such as nerve-sparing surgery to reduce postoperative urinary complications, or argon plasma for ablation of extended peritoneal implants or endometrioma to preserve ovarian function.

Bilateral posterior Richter sacrospinous fixation with native tissue: Anatomical and functional results and quality of life assessment over 10 years.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that affects 50% of women who have given birth in their lifetime. With stop of vaginal mesh sale in 2019, the sacrospinous fixation technique according to Richter with native tissue has seen its incidence tripled in 15 years. Classically, sacrospinous fixation according to Richter is performed unilaterally, however its unilateral or bilateral character is controversial. Objective of this work is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by the posterior approach with native tissue (SSB). METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center study. From March 12, 2010 to March 23, 2020, all first-time operated patients who underwent SSB in CHU Strasbourg gynecological surgery unit for symptomatic POP management were included. The main endpoint of our work is the anatomical and functional success rate at 12 and 24 months. The secondary judgment criteria of our work were based on the postoperative evaluation of patient's quality of life according to the PFDI-20 score as well as the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS: 77 patients were included in our work. The anatomical success rate at 12 months is 94 and 81% at 24 months regardless of the compartment affected. The functional success rate is 94% at 12 months and 82% at 24 months. Quality of life evaluation through the PFDI-20 scale revealed a clear improvement in the symptomatology related to POP: 127/300 +/- 27.3. preoperatively and 59.8 ± 14.7 postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by posterior approach with native tissue is a safe and effective surgical technique allowing a clear improvement in patients quality of life.

Preliminary observational study of the implementation of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer in the gynecological surgery department at the University Hospital of Strasbourg.

OBJECTIVE: According to French guidelines, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be performed for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III primary epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers that are initially unresectable after 3 or 4 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. The main objective of this preliminary study was to analyze the components necessary for the establishment of HIPEC in an expert gynecological oncological surgery center. The secondary objective was to compare HIPEC using conventional laparotomy and laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who received HIPEC. All patients who met the criteria of the French HIPEC guidelines were included from 2019 to 2021. RESULTS: Prior to HIPEC, there were a mean of 3.7 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Of the 16 patients who received HIPEC, 9 (56.2%) underwent HIPEC laparoscopically, while 7 (43.8%) underwent laparotomy. There were no differences between the rates of intra- and postoperative complications between the two groups. (p > 0.05). The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in patients who were operated laparoscopically than in those treated using laparotomy (55.6% <10 days vs. 0 by laparotomy, p = 0.01). There was also a tendency, although not significant, for a more rapid resumption of adjuvant chemotherapy in the laparoscopy group, with 57.1% resuming chemotherapy in <6 weeks compared to 42.9% in the laparotomy group (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of HIPEC in a center with expertise in gynecological surgery when there is a suitable technical platform and close collaboration between the different teams involved. We also showed the first cases of HIPEC using laparoscopy, which seems to be a promising approach.

Feasibility and clinical value of virtual reality for deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: A case report.

Deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis and its surgical management is associated with a risk of major postoperative complications. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is recommended preoperatively in order to obtain the most precise mapping of the extent of endometriotic lesions. The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility and clinical interest of 3D modeling by surface rendering as a preoperative planning tool in a patient with deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. We report on a 42 years old patient with history of endometriosis and persistent pain underwent pre operative imaging with MRI that was consistent with deep infiltrating endometriosis. A 3D model of the deep infiltrating endometriosis was generated from the MRI and retrospectively compared to the intra-operative findings. The nodule's location and relationship to the uterus and the rectum was clearly defined by the 3D model and correlated with surgical findings. Virtual reality based on 3D models could be an interesting tool to assist in the preoperative planning of complex surgeries.

Laparoscopic En Bloc Pelvic Resection with Rectosigmoid Resection and Anastomosis for Stage IIB Ovarian Cancer: Hudson's Procedure Revisited.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a systematic approach to the laparoscopic en bloc pelvic resection with rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis as part of ovarian cancer treatment in a tertiary gynecologic surgery referral center. DESIGN: This video illustrates an en bloc pelvic resection performed par laparoscopy in 10 steps. SETTING: A 56-year-old patient with an advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer extending into the rectum was amenable to primary debulking surgery in accordance with the French guidelines [1]. In diagnostic laparoscopy, a bilateral adnexectomy was performed, and the pelvic carcinomatosis was considered primarily resectable. Histopathology of the subsequent en bloc resection was consistent with stage IIB high-grade serous ovarian cancer with an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy. INTERVENTION: The Hudson's procedure revisited consists of a radical monobloc excision by way of a completely extraperitoneal dissection and total mobilization of the rectum. In this case, owing to rectal invasion, we achieved a laparoscopic radical resection including rectosigmoidectomy and primary anastomosis without the need for a defunctioning stoma [2]. CONCLUSION: Traditionally, an en bloc pelvic resection with rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis was performed by laparotomy. The feasibility of performing laparoscopic optimal cytoreductive surgery in selected patients with advanced ovarian cancer was recently demonstrated without compromising survival in case of low residual disease. The prognosis depends rather on the resectability than on the operative access. However, the radicality and completeness of the cytoreduction, as well as the potential risk of tumor seeding, remain controversially discussed. Here, we demonstrate the minimally invasive approach following the same operative strategy as in open surgery. In this way, the radicality of the "en bloc resection" entailing avoidance of tumor rupture, less bleeding, and less urethral injury is combined with the benefits of a minimally invasive access. In expert hands, this procedure can be performed laparoscopically for other pelvic malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Complete Laparoscopic Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Achieves Similar Survival Outcomes to Open Approach: A Propensity-Matched Study.

To assess the laparoscopic interval debulking surgery (IDS) outcomes compared to laparotomy, by analyzing the overall survival (OS) and the progression free survival (PFS), as well as the intra- and post-operative morbidity.In this retrospective propensity-score-matched cohort study, all patients with stage III or IV FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) serous ovarian cancer, undergoing complete IDS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from January 1st of 2009 to June 1st 2019, were included.Thirty-seven patients were included in the laparoscopy group and 40 in the laparotomy group. There was no significant difference in terms of median OS between laparoscopy and laparotomy (23.1 months [95% CI 15.7-29.7] versus 26.3 months [95% CI 21.7-31.7], respectively, p = 0.17) and median PFS (14.8 months [95% CI 10.6-21.5] versus 12 months [95% CI 11-15.1], p = 0.057). After applying the propensity score, 25 patients were included in each group. Laparoscopy was associated with significantly less early postoperative complications (6 versus 17, p = 0.01) and shorter hospital stay (7.6 days versus 12.1, p < 0.001) and a significantly better OS (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.19-0.95], p = 0.04), but with no significant difference in terms of PFS (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.27-1.88], p = 0.49).In carefully-selected patients with advanced ovarian cancer, complete laparoscopic interval debulking surgery achieves similar survival outcomes to open laparotomy. Therefore, laparoscopy appears as a safe alternative to laparotomy for IDS after NACT in selected patients with advanced ovarian cancer and a low burden of disease.

Nerve Anatomy Around Lumbo-aortic Lymphadenectomy by Retroperitoneal Approach.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the anatomy of the nerves during a laparoscopic retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with prioritization of their preservation. DESIGN: Demonstration of a nerve-preserving para-aortic lymphadenectomy. SETTING: A 65-year-old woman with no significant medical history underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for evaluation of a right ovarian mass. In the absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis, bilateral adnexectomy wasperformed with pathology revealing a high-grade tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma. In accordance with French Guidelines for management of ovarian cancer, operative staging including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was recommended [1]. Final pathology following staging surgery was consistent with stage IA high-grade serous ovarian cancer prompting administration of adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS: We performed a lumbo-aortic lymphadenectomy with preservation of the following nerves: the superior hypogastric plexus, the lumbar splanchnic nerves and the sympathetic trunk. CONCLUSION: Although there are conflicting data as to the benefit of staging lymphadenectomy in women with presumed early stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer, current French Guidelines recommend its performance. When doing so, effort should be made to avoid injury to adjacent normal structures, and in doing so, minimize potential morbidity. The neural structures preserved in this case are part of the sympathetic contingent and participate in the innervation of the abdomen and pelvic viscera. The sympathetic contingent is responsible for the vasomotricity but is also involved in the contraction of the internal genitalia during orgasm and in the inhibition of the peristaltic contractions of the rectum. As such, its preservation may avoid certain postoperative complaints. When possible to do so without compromising essential elements of a cancer surgery, preservation of nerves should be considered.

Basics of immunotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal of all gynecological cancers. Despite excellent responses to standard treatment in approximately 70% of patients, most of them will relapse within 5 years of initial treatment and many of them will develop chemotherapy-resistant disease. It is then important to find other means of treatment for these patients such as immunotherapy or targeted therapy. To understand immunotherapy, it is important to explain the dynamic interplay between cancer and the immune system. Compared to traditional tumor therapies, immunotherapy acts primarily on the immune system or the tumor microenvironment but not directly on the tumor cells, and it may also promote synergistic anti-tumor actions as part of a combined treatment. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a basic understanding of immunotherapy the interest of this treatment in EOC, and to present the main ongoing studies that could change patient management in the future.

Bowel resection performed by gynecologists - Outcomes and learning curves. Activity profile in a Gynecology Department: 7-year observational cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Bowel resection is frequently used when performing oncological surgery to obtain complete cytoreduction or to remove endometriosis in case of intestinal invasion. Acquiring the surgical skills to perform this kind of procedure is crucial to offer to our patients an optimal management. The aim of this study is to describe a 7-years surgical experience in bowel resections of a gynecologic surgeon and to determine his learning curves. STUDY DESIGN: This is a monocentric retrospective cohort study reporting digestive resection performed between January 2013 and April 2020 in the Gynecology Department of Strasbourg University Hospital. Ninety-one consecutive patients were assigned in two groups: gynecological cancer (n = 44) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) (n = 47). The main outcome measure was the postoperative complications rate at 30 days, based on the modified Clavien-Dindo severity system. Learning curves were evaluated using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis of severe perioperative complications. Identification of predictive factors for operation duration and severe perioperative complication occurrence was conducted using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Minor complications were found in 25% of cases. Major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) was 14% in total and only involved patients operated for cancer. The CUSUM curve for operative time peaked at the 35th case and showed a downward slope after the 45th case. Significant predictive factors of operating time were cytoreductive tumoral surgery, size of the bowel resection and laparoscopic surgery, while learning phase 3 significantly decreased it. The RA-CUSUM curve for severe perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) showed a progressive decrease in the complication rate as the number of interventions increases without showing clear inflection points. Only cardiopulmonary pathologies were found as significant predictive factor of severe complications. CONCLUSION: Proficiency in performing highly complex surgery was achieved after approximately 45 cases, cancer and DIE all together. Acceptable rates of severe perioperative complications were observed even during the initial learning period and are comparable with those found in the literature concerning bowel resection performed by gynecologic oncologists but also by general and digestive surgeons.

Adherence to European ovarian cancer guidelines and impact on survival: a French multicenter study (FRANCOGYN).

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study was to validate the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) ovarian cancer guideline as a method of assessing quality of care, and to identify patient characteristics predictive of non-adherence to European guideline care. The secondary objectives were to analyze the evolution of practices over the years and to evaluate heterogeneity between centers. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer reported to the FRANCOGYN database included data from 12 French centers between January 2000 and February 2017. The main outcome was adherence to ESMO-ESGO guidelines, defined by recommended surgical procedures according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and appropriate chemotherapy. Mixed multivariable logistic regression analysis with a random center effect was performed to estimate the probability of adherence to the guidelines. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and a mixed Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: 1463 patients were included in the study. Overall, 317 (30%) patients received complete guideline adherent care. Patients received appropriate surgical treatment in 69% of cases, while adequate chemotherapy was administered to 44% of patients. Both patient demographics and disease characteristics were significantly associated with the likelihood of receiving guideline adherent care, such as age, performance status, FIGO stage, and initial burden of disease. In univariate and multivariate survival analysis, adherence to the guidelines was a statistically significant and independent predictor of decreased overall survival. Patients receiving suboptimal care experienced an increased risk of death of more than 100% compared with those treated according to the guidelines (hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 3.47, p<0.01). In both models, a significant random center effect was observed, confirming the heterogeneity between centers (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ESMO-ESGO guidelines in ovarian cancer was associated with a higher overall survival and may be a useful method of assessing quality of care.

Status of Surgical Management of Borderline Ovarian Tumors in France: are Recommendations Being Followed? Multicentric French Study by the FRANCOGYN Group.

BACKGROUND: Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are tumors with a favorable prognosis but whose management by consensus is essential to limit the risk of invasive recurrence. This study aimed to conduct an inventory of surgical practices for BOT in France and to evaluate the conformity of the treatment according to the current French guidelines. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included nine referral centers of France between January 2001 and December 2018. It analyzed all patients with serous and mucinous BOT who had undergone surgery. A peritoneal staging in accordance with the recommendations was defined by performance of a peritoneal cytology, an omentectomy, and at least one peritoneal biopsy. RESULTS: The study included 332 patients. A laparoscopy was performed in 79.5% of the cases. Treatment was conservative in 31.9% of the cases. The recurrence rate was significantly increased after conservative treatment (17.3% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Peritoneal cytology was performed for 95.5%, omentectomy for 83.1%, and at least one biopsy for 82.2% of the patients. The overall recurrence rate was 7.8%, and the recurrence was invasive in 1.2% of the cases. No link was found between the recurrence rate and the conformity of peritoneal staging. The overall rate of staging noncompliance was 22.9%. CONCLUSION: The current standards for BOT management seem to be well applied.

Relevance of Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Cancer in Well-selected Patients: A Propensity-matched Comparison With Laparotomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of laparoscopy in comparison with laparotomy in the management of ovarian cancer in well-selected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of consecutive ovarian cancer patients treated by laparoscopy were matched 1:1 to a cohort of patients operated by laparotomy using a propensity score matching. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent a complete staging procedure in the early stages and optimal upfront or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. RESULTS: In total, 153 patients were included. Propensity score matching led to the analysis of 41 well-balanced pairs of patients. For a median follow-up of 34.0 [19.0-64.0] months and 38.0 [24.5-75.0] months, respectively, no difference was found between the two groups in regards to overall survival (p=0.28) and disease-free survival (p=0.89). CONCLUSION: In well-selected patients, laparoscopic surgery may be a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy.

Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare a reusable hysteroscopic morcellator and standard resectoscopes in the hysteroscopic management of uterine polyps. DESIGN: Single-center randomized prospective single-blind trial (resectoscope-morcellator study). SETTING: Centre Médico-chirurgical Obstétrique teaching hospital, Strasbourg University Hospitals, France. PATIENTS: All patients presenting with a single endometrial polyp of size 1 cm or larger. INTERVENTIONS: After consent, the patients were randomized into 2 groups: hysteroscopic morcellation (HM) group or standard resection (SR) group. Office-based review hysteroscopy was performed 6 weeks to 8 weeks after surgery. Primary end point: time of morcellation or resection. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: total operating time (minutes), volume of fluid used (mL), fluid deficit (mL), number of morcellator or resectoscope insertions, operator comfort (visual analog scale: 0 to 10) and quality of vision (0 to 5), perioperative complications, completeness of resection, need to convert to another technique, pain assessment (visual analog scale), and length of hospitalization. At review hysteroscopy, we noted whether the resection or morcellation had been effective and if synechiae were present or absent. Statistical analyses followed Bayesian methods. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomized: 45 in the HM group and 45 in the SR group. The average size of polyps at hysteroscopy was 13.3 mm. Morcellation time was lower than resection time (6.1 minutes vs 9 minutes; p [HM < SR] = .996). This also applied to total operating time (12.7 minutes vs 15.6 minutes; p [HM < SR] = .985), number of device insertions (1.50 vs 6; p [HM < SR] > .999), volume of fluid used (766.9 mL vs 1118.9 mL; p [HM < SR] = .994), and fluid deficit (60.2 mL vs 169.8 mL; p [HM < SR] = .989). Operator comfort was better in the HM group (8.4 vs 7.4; p [HM > SR] = .999) as was visualization (4 vs 3.7; p [HM > SR] = .911, highly probable). Operative complications were higher in the SR group (5 vs 0; p [HM < SR] = .989]. One patient in the SR group died after surgery owing to an anesthetic complication (anaphylactic shock complicated by pulmonary embolism). No differences were noted between the groups for pain assessment, length of hospitalization, and outcome on review hysteroscopy. CONCLUSION: The reusable morcellator is quicker, uses less fluid with less deficit and fewer introductory maneuvers, and offers better comfort and visualization than the resectoscope while being as effective for the hysteroscopic treatment of uterine polyps.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling in Endometrial Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling in high risk endometrial cancer according to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO classification. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed for clinical trials evaluating SLN sampling in patients with high risk endometrial cancer: stage I endometrioid, grade 3, with at least 50% myometrial invasion, regardless of lymphovascular space invasion status; or stage II; or node-negative stage III endometrioid, no residual disease; or non-endometrioid (serous or clear cell or undifferentiated carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma). All patients underwent SLN sampling followed by pelvic with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: We included 17 original studies concerning 1322 women. Mean detection rates were 89% for unilateral and 68% for bilateral. Pooled sensitivity was 88.5% (95%CI: 81.2-93.2%), negative predictive value was 96.0% (95%CI: 93.1-97.7%), and false negative rate was 11.5% (95%CI: 6.8; 18.8%). We noted heterogeneity in SLN techniques between studies, concerning the tracer and its detection, the injection site, the number of injections, and the surgical approach. Finally, we found a correlation between the number of patients included and the SLN sampling performances. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis estimated the SLN sampling performances in high risk endometrial cancer patients. Data from the literature show the feasibility, the safety, the limits, and the impact on surgical de-escalation of this technique. In conclusion, our study supports the hypothesis that SLN sampling could be a valuable technique to diagnose lymph node involvement for patients with high risk endometrial cancer in replacement of conventional lymphadenectomy. Consequently, randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging of Peritoneal Fibrosis Mimicking Persistent Metastatic Ovarian Carcinoma.

A 65-year-old woman was addressed for clinical and biological suspicion of ovarian cancer relapse. 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed massive peritoneal carcinomatosis. Post-chemotherapy PET/CT showed complete metabolic response in initial localizations albeit three new 18F-FDG uptakes appeared in the mesentery and in the retro-hepatic space. Close follow-up (including PET/CT scan) and surgical examination of the abdominal cavity confirmed the absence of malignancy and the benign nature of these lesions, which appeared to be peritoneal fibrosis mimicking persistent carcinomatosis.

Three and Five-Year Mortality in Ovarian Cancer after Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

As regards ovarian cancer, the use of minimally invasive surgery has steadily increased over the years. Reluctance persists, however, about its oncological outcomes. The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the three and five-year mortality of patients operated by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ovarian cancer to those operated by conventional open surgery (OPS), as well as their respective perioperative outcomes. PubMed, Cochrane library and CinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched, using the terms laparoscopy, laparoscopic or minimally invasive in combination with ovarian cancer or ovarian carcinoma. We finally included 19 observational studies with a total of 7213 patients. We found no statistically significant difference for five-year (relative risk (RR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.53-1.49, p = 0.62)) and three-year mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.12, p = 0.52) between the patients undergoing MIS and those operated by OPS. When five and three-year recurrences were analyzed, no statistically significant differences were also observed. Analysis in early and advanced stages subgroups showed no significant difference for survival outcomes, suggesting oncological safety of MIS in all stages. Whether the surgery was primary or interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer, did not influence the comparative results on mortality or recurrence. Although the available studies are retrospective, and mostly carry a high risk for bias and confounding, an overwhelming consistency of the evidence suggests the likely effectiveness of MIS in selected cases of ovarian cancer, even in advanced stages. To validate the use of MIS, the development of future randomized interventional studies should be a priority.