Assessing muscle architecture with ultrasound: implications for spasticity.

Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) injections using Ultrasound (US) guidance have led to research evaluating changes in muscle architecture. Controversy remains as to what constitutes increased Echo-Intensity (EI) in spastic muscles and whether this may affect outcomes. We aim to provide a narrative review of US muscle architecture changes following Central Nervous System (CNS) lesions and explore their relationship to spasticity. Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched with keywords: ultrasonography, hypertonia, spasticity, fibrosis, and Heckmatt. Three physicians reviewed the results of the search to select relevant papers. Reviews identified in the search were used as a resource to identify additional studies. A total of 68 papers were included. Four themes were identified, including histopathological changes in spastic muscle, effects of BoNT-A on the muscle structure, available US modalities to assess the muscle, and utility of US assessment in clinical spasticity. Histopathological studies revealed atrophic and fibro-fatty changes after CNS lesions. Several papers described BoNT-A injections contributing to those modifications. These changes translated to increased EI. The exact significance of increased muscle EI remains unclear. The Modified Heckmatt Scale (MHS) is a validated tool for grading muscle EI in spasticity. The use of the US may be an important tool to assess muscle architecture changes in spasticity and improve spasticity management. Treatment algorithms may be developed based on the degree of EI. Further research is needed to determine the incidence and impact of these EI changes in spastic muscles.

Cryoneurolysis of the Femoral Nerve for Focal Spasticity in an Ambulatory Patient.

Introduction: Spasticity of the knee extensors is a common presentation among patients with multiple sclerosis. The resulting stiff leg gait can result in increased risk of falls, heightened energy expenditure during gait, lowered gait speed, and compensatory gait mechanisms that increase wear on the hips. Cryoneurolysis is a novel percutaneous, minimally invasive treatment for focal spasticity. Methods: A single patient with multiple sclerosis was treated with cryoneurolysis of the femoral nerve branch to rectus femoris. The patient was followed for 15 months. Spasticity severity, gait speed, and patient reported outcomes were collected at each follow-up. Results: Spasticity severity as per the Modified Ashworth Scale was reduced at 1 month, with change persisting up to 15 months post-procedure. Range of motion as per the Modified Tardieu Scale showed gradual improvement over the 15-month period. Gait speed increased after the procedure from 21.15 seconds to 12.49 seconds for the 10 m walk test 1 month post-procedure, then slowed to baseline after 15 months. The patient's confidence in their gait improved and their independence was maintained throughout the follow-up period. Because of the regression in the 10 m walk test, the patient elected to have the procedure repeated after 15 months. Immediately after the procedure, the 10 m test time improved to 16.20 seconds. Conclusion: Cryoneurolysis of the femoral nerve may be an effective, long-lasting treatment for spasticity causing stiff knee gait in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Analysis of Adverse Effects of Cryoneurolysis for the Treatment of Spasticity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to report adverse effects from clinical studies on ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis for spasticity. DESIGN: Patients were prospectively enrolled in three studies at a single institution. Cryoneurolysis was performed to primarily motor nerve branches (medial and lateral pectoral, musculocutaneous, radial, median, ulnar, tibial, obturator) and mixed motor sensory nerve trunks (median, ulnar, suprascapular, radial, and tibial). RESULTS: Cryoneurolysis was performed for 277 nerves (99 mixed motor sensory), on 113 patients (59 F, 54 M, average age 54.4 yrs). One patient had a local skin infection and two patients had bruising or swelling; all resolved within 1 mo. Nine reported nerve pain or dysesthesia (two motor, seven mixed motor sensory nerves). Four received no treatment, four oral or topical medications, two perineural injections, one botulinum toxin. Three patients' symptoms remained until 3 mos and one had numbness at six. One patient had botulinum toxin injections for cramping. All had at minimum 3-mo follow-up; seven withdrew (x̄ = 5.4 mos), four passed away. None of these 11 reported adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 96.75% of nerve treatments had no pain or dysesthesias beyond treatment. Few had pain or numbness beyond 3 mos. Cryoneurolysis has potential to be a safe spasticity treatment with manageable adverse effects.

Bilateral Suprascapular Nerve Cryoneurolysis for Pain Associated With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Case Report.

Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability, typically treated with exercise, analgesics, injections, or surgeries. Cryoneurolysis is an established technique for the treatment of pain, including osteoarthritis that may provide an alternative for patients in whom surgery is not appropriate and conservative measures have failed. We present our experience with a 78-year-old man with severe pain from bilateral glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Their condition is complicated by several concurrent diagnoses, leaving them ineligible for surgical intervention, despite pharmacologic treatments proving insufficient to manage their pain. As an alternative, bilateral cryoneurolysis of the suprascapular nerve was performed at the suprascapular notch. Pain and disability scores both lessened on the Brief Pain Inventory Score, Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (change of 9 points after 170 days) as well as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (change of 19 points after 170 days). The patient had improved active and passive range of motion for flexion, abduction, and external rotation of the shoulder. Improvements endured to follow-up at 170 days. There were no negative side effects as a result of the procedure.

Recommendations for Ultrasound Guidance for Diagnostic Nerve Blocks for Spasticity. What Are the Benefits?

The diagnostic nerve block (DNB) for spasticity is the percutaneous application of an anesthetic to an individual peripheral nerve trunk (mixed motor sensory nerve), nerve branch to a muscle or an intramuscular branch. The DNB causes a temporary paralysis to assess the contribution of muscle(s) on the spastic pattern and may unmask a fully or partially increased joint range of motion. The anesthetic literature supports the use of ultrasound (US) guidance to improve nerve blocks for sensory targets. This communication summarizes the potential advantages that support the use of US to improve DNB technique. Nerves are much smaller than muscle targets and have various known innervation patterns. US allows for rapid localization of the target before injection, particularly in complex anatomy patterns. The nerve trunks are typically found adjacent to or encapsulating blood vessels, which can be quickly identified with or without color Doppler, allowing the clinician to scan from the vessels to the target and avoid intravascular injection. Lower stimulation levels can be used as the targeted muscle(s) can be seen stimulating rather than only on the surface. A shorter needle insertion time and lower stimulation levels should cause less discomfort to the patient. Smaller volumes of anesthetic may be used as the fluid is seen reaching its target and cessation of stimulation is observed. Further study is needed to identify evidence supporting US utilization with electrical stimulation in DNBs for spasticity management, as US use during nerve blocks for perineurial anesthesia has demonstrated improved patient safety and procedural efficiency.

Canadian Physicians' Use of Intramuscular Botulinum Toxin Injections for Shoulder Spasticity: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Spasticity of the upper extremity can result in severe pain, along with many complications that can impair a patient's activities of daily living. Failure to treat patients with spasticity of the upper limb can result in a decrease in the range of motion of joints and contracture development, leading to further restriction in daily activities. We aimed to investigate the practice patterns of Canadian physicians who utilize Botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) injections in the management of shoulder spasticity. 50 Canadian Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) physicians completed a survey with an estimated completion rate of (36.23%). The demographics of the survey participants came from a variety of provinces, clinical settings, and patient populations. The most common muscle injected for shoulder adduction and internal rotation spasticity was the pectoralis major, this was followed by latissimus dorsi, pectoralis minor, subscapularis and teres major. Injection of BoNT-A for problematic post-stroke shoulder spasticity was common, with (81.48%) of participants responding that it was always or often used in their management of post-stroke spasticity (PSS). Dosing of BoNT-A demonstrated variability for the muscle injected as well as the type of toxin used. The goals of the patients, caregivers, and practitioners were used to help guide the management of these patients. As a result, the practice patterns of Canadian physicians who treat shoulder spasticity are varied, due to numerous patient factors. Future studies are needed to analyze optimal treatment patterns, and the development of algorithms to standardize care.

A retrospective review of the management and outcomes of patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type II using electrodiagnostic findings.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of the use of electrodiagnosis in the diagnosis and management of discrete nerve injuries in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Design: This study is a secondary retrospective cohort analysis of patients diagnosed with CRPS from a single outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic and included all patients who had abnormal electrodiagnostic findings, in addition to CRPS. Results: Sixty patients of 248 diagnosed with CRPS underwent electrodiagnosis, 41 of whom had abnormal electrodiagnostic findings indicating a discrete nerve injury. Only 51% of the 41 referrals had indicated the suspicion of a nerve injury. Nearly all patients had undergone physiotherapy. Forty-one percent responded to treatment with oral prednisone alone, 54% had a functional improvement after a combination of treatments including corticosteroids, and 5% improved with treatments that did not involve corticosteroids. Surgical interventions for nerve injuries were required for 34% of patients in the cohort. All surgeries involved the median or ulnar nerve, with the exception of one fibular nerve. After treatment, 39 of 41 patients had functional recoveries or better. Conclusions: Electrodiagnosis can inform diagnosis of nerve injury and direct intervention including the need for surgical intervention. Electrodiagnosis should be considered for patients with initial signs of concomitant discrete nerve injury or with CRPS who are not responding to treatments because a nerve injury may be underlying.What is Known Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a poorly understood pain condition. CRPS has been divided into two subtypes, the second subtype involves a discrete nerve injury with pain that extends beyond the territory of the nerve injury.What is New We observed that nerve injuries that may require surgical intervention are diagnosed just over half of the time upon initial assessment in patients with suspected CRPS. We observed that nerve injuries frequently required specifically directed interventions in place of or in conjunction with CRPS treatments. We suggest that electrodiagnosis is an important part of the triage protocol for CRPS II to reveal discrete nerve injuries that may be hidden. We recommend that electrodiagnosis be considered for patients with initial signs of concomitant discrete nerve injury or for CRPS patients who do not improve with medical therapies.

CRPS typically occurs after an injury or inciting event and can be accompanied by severe pain, sensitivity, swelling, changes in the color of the skin, changes in the texture of the skin, changes in hair and nail growth, weakness, muscle wasting, range of motion reduction, and temperature changes in the affected area. Little is known about type II CRPS, which may present with all of the same signs and symptoms as above but with damage to a nerve in the area. This study examined cases of CRPS where patients had electrodiagnostic findings that suggested a nerve injury. We found that the referring physicians reported nerve injuries in just over half of the cases. Oral prednisone was often the chosen treatment for these patients, although many required additional treatments, including surgery, to address their nerve injury. We recommend that electrodiagnosis be considered for patients with CRPS who are not responding to corticosteroids because a nerve injury could be preventing CRPS symptoms from resolving. When the CRPS trigger was a trauma that likely simultaneously injured the nerve, patients needed to have surgery more frequently than those with atraumatic onsets.

Dancers' Perceptions of Accessibility and Quality of the Relationship with Healthcare Professionals in Quebec.

OBJECTIVE: To understand dancers' perception of accessibility to care and quality of the relationship with healthcare practitioners in Quebec; to identify the key elements of an optimal dancer-physician relationship; and to propose recommendations for improvement. METHODS: An online questionnaire consisting of multiple choice, "yes/no," and short answer questions was sent to professional dance organizations, companies, agencies, and schools in Quebec, Canada. Information regarding the dance artists' sociodemographics, dance background, dance-related injuries, and access to a primary care physician were collected. Experiences and expectations regarding the dancer-physician relationship were surveyed. One-way ANOVA analyses and Pearson correlations were performed to assess differences of perception between dancers' demographic characteristics and associations between the variables. RESULTS: Out of 161 participants, 144 met inclusion criteria, consisting of largely French-speaking females, North American or European decent, self-employed contemporary dancers with an average age of 33.13 ± 10.81 yrs. Dance artists sought medical care from osteopaths (47.9%) and physiotherapists (36.1%) more frequently than from physicians (8.3%). Fully employed dancers had more favorable perceptions of the dancer-physician relationship compared to self-employed dancers and those who had mixed streams of income. The perception of most participants was that physicians do not comprehend the unique dance-associated impacts on health (81.8%). The most important aspect affecting perception of the relationship with the physician was diagnostic acumen (41.3%). Most participants (79.0%) selected "works with other health professionals [...] and gives expert advice" as an important expectation from physicians. CONCLUSION: This research is the first investigation of the dancer-physician relationship in Quebec. It reveals a desire amongst the dance artist community to improve the dancer-physician relationship and the overall quality of their unique healthcare requirements.

Brain stimulation in attention deficits after traumatic brain injury: a literature review and feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: After a traumatic brain injury, disturbances in the attentional processes have a direct negative effect on functional recovery and on return to complex activities. To date, there is no good attention remediation treatment available. The primary objective of this review and pilot study is to provide an overview of the research evidence and to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a tDCS protocol to improve attention disorders in patients with mild complicated to severe subacute TBI, hospitalized in an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Our secondary objective is to extract preliminary data and observational information on participants' response to treatment. METHODS: Participants were recruited from a consecutive series of patients admitted to the TBI unit of a subspecialized regional rehabilitation center. They received a 20-min tDCS stimulation 3 times a week for 3 weeks. A neuropsychological evaluation was performed before and after the intervention. We collected participants' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as information about satisfaction, tolerability, and adverse effects. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four patients were admitted between September 2018 and January 2020. One hundred fifty-eight were excluded, and 6 patients with presumed attentional deficits were enrolled. None completed the protocol as intended. No major side effects occurred. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive brain neurostimulation is promising to enhance attention deficits in patients with TBI. Implementation of a tDCS protocol to fulfill this purpose in an intensive inpatient rehabilitation center has its limitations. We made recommendations to facilitate the implementation of similar projects in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN55243064 . Registered 14 October 2020-retrospectively registered.