Detection of COVID-19 case clusters in Québec, May-October 2020.

OBJECTIVES: The Quebec Public Health Institute (INSPQ) was mandated to develop an automated tool for detecting space-time COVID-19 case clusters to assist regional public health authorities in identifying situations that require public health interventions. This article aims to describe the methodology used and to document the main outcomes achieved. METHODS: New COVID-19 cases are supplied by the "Trajectoire de santé publique" information system, geolocated to civic addresses and then aggregated by day and dissemination area. To target community-level clusters, cases identified as residents of congregate living settings are excluded from the cluster detection analysis. Detection is performed using the space-time scan statistic and Poisson statistical model, and implemented in the SaTScan software. Information on detected clusters is disseminated daily via an online interactive mapping interface. RESULTS: The number of clusters detected tracked with the number of new cases. Slightly more than 4900 statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) space-time clusters were detected over 14 health regions from May to October 2020. The Montréal region was the most affected. CONCLUSION: Considering the objective of timely cluster detection, the use of near-real-time health surveillance data of varying quality over time and by region constitutes an acceptable compromise between timeliness and data quality. This tool serves to supplement the epidemiologic investigations carried out by regional public health authorities for purposes of COVID-19 management and prevention.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ) a reçu le mandat d'élaborer un outil de détection automatisé des agrégats spatio-temporels des cas de COVID-19 afin d'aider les régions à détecter des situations nécessitant des interventions de santé publique. Cet article vise à décrire la méthodologie utilisée et à présenter les principaux résultats obtenus. MéTHODE: Les nouveaux cas de COVID-19 proviennent du Système d'information Trajectoire de santé publique, ils sont géolocalisés à l'adresse civique, puis agrégés par jour et par aire de diffusion. Afin d'isoler la transmission communautaire, les cas identifiés comme résidents d'un milieu de vie fermé sont exclus des analyses de détection des agrégats. La méthode de détection est la statistique de balayage spatio-temporel basée sur le modèle de Poisson et implantée dans le logiciel SaTScan . Les agrégats détectés sont diffusés quotidiennement dans une interface cartographique web interactive. RéSULTATS: Le nombre d'agrégats détectés varie en fonction du nombre de nouveaux cas. Un peu plus de 4 900 agrégats spatio-temporels statistiquement significatifs (p ≤ 0,01) ont été détectés dans 14 régions sociosanitaires entre mai et octobre 2020. La région de Montréal est la plus touchée. CONCLUSION: Considérant l'objectif d'une détection d'agrégats en temps opportun, l'utilisation des données de vigie sanitaire en temps quasi réel, dont la qualité est variable dans le temps et selon les régions, constitue un compromis acceptable. Il s'agit d'un outil complémentaire aux enquêtes épidémiologiques menées par les autorités régionales de santé publique dans la gestion et la prévention des impacts populationnels de la COVID-19.

Human saphenous vein endothelial cell adhesion and expansion on micropatterned polytetrafluoroethylene.

Intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis are responsible for the poor patency rates of small-diameter vascular grafts. These complications could be avoided by a rapid and strong adhesion of endothelial cells to the prosthetic surfaces, which typically consist of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for small-diameter vessels. We have previously described two peptide micropatterning strategies that increase the endothelialization rates of PTFE. The micropatterns were generated either by inkjet printing 300 µm squares or by spraying 10.1 ± 0.1 µm diameter droplets of the CGRGDS cell adhesion peptide, while the remaining surface was functionalized using the CWQPPRARI cell migration peptide. We now directly compare these two micropatterning strategies and examine the effect of hydrodynamic stress on human saphenous vein endothelial cells grown on the patterned surfaces. No significant differences in cell adhesion were observed between the two micropatterning methods. When compared to unpatterned surfaces treated with a uniform mixture of the two peptides, the cell expansion was significantly higher on sprayed or printed surfaces after 9 days of static cell culture. In addition, after 6 h of exposure to hydrodynamic stress, the cell retention and cell cytoskeleton reorganization on the patterned surfaces was improved when compared to untreated or random treated surfaces. These results indicate that micropatterned surfaces lead to improved rates of PTFE endothelialization with higher resistance to hydrodynamic stress.

The number of injections does not influence local anesthetic absorption after paravertebral blockade.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to determine if the injection of a single large dose of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space increases the risks of inducing toxicity compared with multiple small injections and to describe ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade. METHODS: Paravertebral blockade was performed using a solution of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.75%, 10 mL lidocaine CO2 2% plus 0.1 mL epinephrine 1:1000 either by a single injection at T3 or T4 (Group S, n = 6) or by five injections of 4 mL each at T2 to T6 (Group M, n = 8). Blood samples were taken at zero, five, ten, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min and at two, three, four, five, six and eight hours. Ropivacaine and lidocaine plasma concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Maximal plasma concentrations were comparable for lidocaine: 2.6 +/- 1.3 (S) vs 2.6 +/- 0.8 microg x mL(-1) (M) and for ropivacaine: 1.3 +/- 0.2 (S) vs 1.3 +/- 0.1 microg x mL(-1) (M). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve was higher in Group M for lidocaine: 577.6 +/- 146.1 vs 401.7 +/- 53.2 mg x min(-1) x mL(-1) (P = 0.04) but similar for ropivacaine: 381.1 +/- 95.4 (M) vs 363.1 +/- 85.3 mg x min(-1) x L(-1) (S). CONCLUSIONS: The injection of a single large bolus of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space does not increase its absorption. Maximal ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade are similar to those reported with equivalent doses of bupivacaine.