Preliminary clinical results of two techniques for addressing graft tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

This study reports the initial clinical results of 540 degrees of graft rotation or free tibial bone block to address graft tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The operative reports of patients who underwent endoscopic ACL reconstruction between 1999 and 2001 were reviewed. Nine of 11 patients treated with a free tibial bone block and 14 of 17 patients treated with 540 degrees of graft rotation were evaluated. Mean follow-up was 20 months (range: 13-40 months) for the bone block group and 34 months (range: 18-48 months) for the 540 degrees group. There were statistically significant improvements in physical examination test results postoperatively, and only one patient in the 540 degrees group had a grade one positive pivot shift test. KT-1000 arthrometer testing demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in manual maximum and side-to-side differences at final follow-up. Mean Lysholm and Noyes sports function scores were excellent or good for all patients. One patient required reoperation for flexion contracture, one patient required an arthroscopic irrigation and debridement for a minor infection, and one patient required arthroscopic subtotal medial meniscectomy for failed meniscal repair. No difference was noted between these results and previous results of patients undergoing conventional endoscopic ACL reconstruction. These results demonstrate graft rotation and free bone block techniques are effective in addressing graft tunnel mismatch in endoscopic ACL reconstruction.

Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports of allograft performance, immune response, tissue incorporation, and rerupture rates when used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of a fresh-frozen, nonirradiated, patellar tendon allograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue a minimum of 2 years ago were evaluated with physical examinations, the KT-1000 arthrometer, functional testing, radiographic evaluation, subjective assessment, and outcomes tools. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (60 knees) were evaluated at an average of 51 months after surgery. Ninety-four percent of patients were mostly or completely satisfied. A negative pivot shift test result was noted in 90% of subjects. The KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences were < or =3 mm in 95% of patients, and no patient exceeded 5 mm. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 78 (SD = 19), and the mean Lysholm score was 82 (SD = 17). There were no clinical symptoms consistent with graft rejection or infection. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated infrequent significant tunnel widening. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a fresh-frozen, nonirradiated allograft for primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is a successful procedure both subjectively and functionally for restoring stability in patients selected for allograft reconstruction. In the patients selected for this surgical procedure, clinical, arthrometric stability testing, and subjective satisfaction were comparable to our previously published cohort studies using patellar tendon autograft at similar postoperative follow-up.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft used to salvage a failed index patellar tendon autograft procedure. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective case series with minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Between 1993 and 1999, 39 patients underwent a revision reconstruction. Clinical, radiographic, arthrometric, and functional evaluations were performed. The Tegner, Lysholm, Noyes, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and SF-12 rating scales were used. Statistical analysis was conducted with our Biostatistics Department. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 38 patients (84%) were personally evaluated. The mean patient age was 28 years (range, 16 to 57 years); the mean follow-up was 4.8 years (range, 2.1 to 12.1 years). After revision, there were significant improvements in the Lachman and pivot-shift test results: 87% had a grade 0/1+ Lachman and a 0/1+ pivot-shift. However, 25% had a grade 1+ pivot-shift. Postoperatively, KT-1000 testing revealed that 84% had a maximum manual side-to-side difference of < or =3 mm and 6% had >5 mm. Functional testing revealed a mean 4% difference in side-to-side comparisons for a single-leg hop for distance and time, as well as vertical jump. The mean results of Noyes sports function (72), Lysholm (75), Tegner (6.3), KOOS sports activity scale (67), SF-12 physical component (48), SF-12 mental component (55), and IKDC (71) were obtained. The Noyes sports activity score showed a significant improvement from 55 preoperatively to 70 at follow-up. Subjectively, 87% of patients indicated that they were completely or mostly satisfied with the surgical outcome. One patient required another revision. CONCLUSIONS: The 2- to 11-year follow-up showed that the results of revision ACL reconstruction with a nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft were less favorable than those of a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, with a lower subjective satisfaction level and a higher percentage of patients with grade 1+ or higher pivot-shift results. However, when compared with previously published reports, our results were comparable and underscore that revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery should be approached with tempered enthusiasm and careful preoperative counseling, and considered as a salvage procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Partial Achilles Tendon Rupture Following Corticosteroid Injection.

In brief Corticosteroid injections are sometimes used to treat Achilles tendinitis after conservative measures such as anti-inflammatory medications, rest, ice massage, and immobilization have failed. Some research suggests that corticosteroid injections can lead to tendon rupture, though other investigations have not shown a correlation. A case report detailing partial Achilles tendon rupture after corticosteroid injection renews concern about the risks of this treatment.