Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 145: 107097, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Removal of zero-COVID restrictions in China led to a surge in COVID-19 cases. In response, countries imposed restrictions on Chinese travelers. However, border policies imposed may not have been informed by accurate data and may not have provided substantial benefits. METHODS: We analyzed quarantines sufficient to prevent additional in-country transmission for February 13-19, 2023 based on World Health Organization (WHO) and self-reported infections to estimate prevalence. RESULTS: We have shown that self-reported prevalence data indicated more stringent border restrictions compared to WHO-published prevalence statistics. No travel restrictions were required for Singapore, South Korea, and Japan so that infections would not be greater than with complete border closure. However, a 1-, 2-, and 3-day quarantine were indicated for England, Germany, and Scotland respectively. A 10-, 13-, and 14-day quarantine were required for Italy, France, and the Philippines, respectively, to prevent an increase in within-country infections due to travel. Vietnam and Thailand required a complete border shutdown. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated the necessity for accurate and timely reporting of pandemic statistics to prevent an increase in viral spread. Through the minimum quarantine analysis, countries can use science to determine policy, minimize international friction, and improve the cost-efficiency of interventions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Travel , Humans , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Prevalence , Health Policy , Communicable Disease Control/methods , COVID-19 Testing/methods
2.
J Cyst Fibros ; 2023 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37977937

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detecting airway inflammation non-invasively in infants with cystic fibrosis (CF) is difficult. We hypothesized that markers of inflammation in CF [IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, neutrophil elastase (NE) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)] could be measured in infants with CF from nasal fluid and would be elevated during viral infections or clinician-defined pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). METHODS: We collected nasal fluid, nasal swabs, and hair samples from 34 infants with CF during monthly clinic visits, sick visits, and hospitalizations. Nasal fluid was isolated and analyzed for cytokines. Respiratory viral detection on nasal swabs was performed using the Luminex NxTAG® Respiratory Pathogen Panel. Hair samples were analyzed for nicotine concentration by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. We compared nasal cytokine concentrations between the presence and absence of detected respiratory viruses, PEx, and smoke exposure. RESULTS: A total of 246 samples were analyzed. Compared to measurements in the absence of respiratory viruses, mean concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and NE were significantly increased while IL-17A was significantly decreased in infants positive for respiratory viruses. IL-17A was significantly decreased and NE increased in those with a PEx. IL-8 and NE were significantly increased in infants with enteric pathogen positivity on airway cultures, but not P. aeruginosa or S. aureus. Compared to those with no smoke exposure, there were significantly higher levels of IL-6, IL-10, and NE in infants with detectable levels of nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive collection of nasal fluid may identify inflammation in infants with CF during changing clinical or environmental exposures.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...