Absence of HER4 expression predicts recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The type 1 tyrosine kinase receptor HER2 (c-erbB2/neu) is associated with resistance to hormone therapy and poor survival in invasive breast cancer, whereas HER4 expression is associated with endocrine responsiveness. Patterns of tyrosine kinase receptor coexpression may aid prediction of recurrence risk after surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Women who had undergone surgery for pure DCIS were studied. Out of 129 primary tumors, 39 had recurred and 90 had not recurred after 5 years of follow-up. Primary tumors were compared for HER2, HER3, and HER4, estrogen receptor, and Ki67 by immunohistochemistry. HER2 was expressed in 58%, HER3 in 49%, and HER4 in 63% of nonrecurrent DCIS, compared with HER2 expression in 82% (P = 0.008), HER3 expression in 71% (P = 0.04), and HER4 expression in 36% (P = 0.004) in DCIS that subsequently recurred. Dually expressing HER2/4 DCIS was more likely to be estrogen receptor positive than HER2-only-expressing DCIS (73% versus 53%; P = 0.05). HER2 expression was associated with a higher percentage and HER4 expression a significantly lower percentage of proliferating DCIS cells (median, 13.8% versus 8.4%; P = 0.001). Coexpression of HER2 with HER4 was associated with reduced recurrence compared with HER2-only positive DCIS (P = 0.003). This association remained significant when analyzing only high nuclear-grade DCIS (P = 0.015). Low nuclear grade, low proliferation rate and presence of HER4 expression were independent predictors of nonrecurrence. Potentially, HER4 expression may identify women who could avoid radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS.

Short-term biologic response to withdrawal of hormone replacement therapy in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The biologic effect of continuing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma is unclear. The goal of rhe current study was to determine the short-term effect of HRT withdrawal on invasive breast carcinoma using biologic surrogate markers of tumor response. METHODS: The study was performed between 1996 and 2000 and comprised 140 women who had been using HRT at the time of breast carcinoma diagnosis by core needle biopsy. The breast tumors were removed a median of 17 days later (range, 2-31 days). Of these women, 125 women stopped HRT at the time of core needle biopsy and 15 continued to receive HRT until surgery. In addition, 55 women with breast carcinoma from the same time period, who were not receiving HRT at diagnosis, were studied. Changes in expression of Ki-67 (a measure of epithelial cell proliferation), progesterone receptor (PR), p27KIP-1 (a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor), and cyclin D1 (a cell cycle-related protein) were determined by immunohistochemistry on paired sections of the core needle biopsy and surgical specimens from each patient. RESULTS: In women who stopped HRT, a significant decrease in Ki-67 expression was observed between core needle biopsy and surgery in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (n = 106; P < 0.001), but not in ER-negative tumors (n = 19; P = 0.58), with an associated reduction in PR (P < 0.001) and cyclin D1 expression (P < 0.001) and an increase in p27KIP-1 (P = 0.03). These changes in Ki-67 and PR expression occurred irrespective of c-erb-B2 status. No change was observed in any parameter in the other groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: ER-positive invasive breast carcinomas demonstrated a favorable biologic response to withdrawal of HRT. Therefore, HRT should be stopped at the time of diagnosis and was subsequently contraindicated.

Molecular markers and therapeutic targets in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a premalignant condition which accounts for approximately 20% of all new breast cancers and up to 40% of neoplastic lesions detected by mammographic screening. Since recurrence is common after DCIS treated with breast conservation surgery, there is a need to determine molecular factors that predict recurrence. In parallel with this and with the finding that oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer can be prevented with anti-oestrogens, there have been recent advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of DCIS. Receptor coexpression in DCIS has been determined largely by immunohistochemistry. Animal models have provided evidence for the signalling pathways involved in the regulation and dysregulation of proliferation and apoptosis in both normal breast and in situ cancer. ER-negative DCIS has been shown to be hormone-independent. Blockade of the pathways involved in cell proliferation in ER-negative DCIS is possible and will be necessary to prevent ER-negative breast cancers if the goal of breast cancer chemoprevention is to be realistically achieved.