Synergizing Chemical Structures and Bioassay Descriptions for Enhanced Molecular Property Prediction in Drug Discovery.

The precise prediction of molecular properties can greatly accelerate the development of new drugs. However, in silico molecular property prediction approaches have been limited so far to assays for which large amounts of data are available. In this study, we develop a new computational approach leveraging both the textual description of the assay of interest and the chemical structure of target compounds. By combining these two sources of information via self-supervised learning, our tool can provide accurate predictions for assays where no measurements are available. Remarkably, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on the FS-Mol benchmark for zero-shot prediction, outperforming a wide variety of deep learning approaches. Additionally, we demonstrate how our tool can be used for tailoring screening libraries for the assay of interest, showing promising performance in a retrospective case study on a high-throughput screening campaign. By accelerating the early identification of active molecules in drug discovery and development, this method has the potential to streamline the identification of novel therapeutics.

Machine Learning Assisted Hit Prioritization for High Throughput Screening in Drug Discovery.

Efficient prioritization of bioactive compounds from high throughput screening campaigns is a fundamental challenge for accelerating drug development efforts. In this study, we present the first data-driven approach to simultaneously detect assay interferents and prioritize true bioactive compounds. By analyzing the learning dynamics during training of a gradient boosting model on noisy high throughput screening data using a novel formulation of sample influence, we are able to distinguish between compounds exhibiting the desired biological response and those producing assay artifacts. Therefore, our method enables false positive and true positive detection without relying on prior screens or assay interference mechanisms, making it applicable to any high throughput screening campaign. We demonstrate that our approach consistently excludes assay interferents with different mechanisms and prioritizes biologically relevant compounds more efficiently than all tested baselines, including a retrospective case study simulating its use in a real drug discovery campaign. Finally, our tool is extremely computationally efficient, requiring less than 30 s per assay on low-resource hardware. As such, our findings show that our method is an ideal addition to existing false positive detection tools and can be used to guide further pharmacological optimization after high throughput screening campaigns.

Effectiveness of molecular fingerprints for exploring the chemical space of natural products.

Natural products are a diverse class of compounds with promising biological properties, such as high potency and excellent selectivity. However, they have different structural motifs than typical drug-like compounds, e.g., a wider range of molecular weight, multiple stereocenters and higher fraction of sp3-hybridized carbons. This makes the encoding of natural products via molecular fingerprints difficult, thus restricting their use in cheminformatics studies. To tackle this issue, we explored over 30 years of research to systematically evaluate which molecular fingerprint provides the best performance on the natural product chemical space. We considered 20 molecular fingerprints from four different sources, which we then benchmarked on over 100,000 unique natural products from the COCONUT (COlleCtion of Open Natural prodUcTs) and CMNPD (Comprehensive Marine Natural Products Database) databases. Our analysis focused on the correlation between different fingerprints and their classification performance on 12 bioactivity prediction datasets. Our results show that different encodings can provide fundamentally different views of the natural product chemical space, leading to substantial differences in pairwise similarity and performance. While Extended Connectivity Fingerprints are the de-facto option to encoding drug-like compounds, other fingerprints resulted to match or outperform them for bioactivity prediction of natural products. These results highlight the need to evaluate multiple fingerprinting algorithms for optimal performance and suggest new areas of research. Finally, we provide an open-source Python package for computing all molecular fingerprints considered in the study, as well as data and scripts necessary to reproduce the results, at https://github.com/dahvida/NP_Fingerprints .

Practical guidelines for the use of gradient boosting for molecular property prediction.

Decision tree ensembles are among the most robust, high-performing and computationally efficient machine learning approaches for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. Among them, gradient boosting has recently garnered particular attention, for its performance in data science competitions, virtual screening campaigns, and bioactivity prediction. However, different variants of gradient boosting exist, the most popular being XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost. Our study provides the first comprehensive comparison of these approaches for QSAR. To this end, we trained 157,590 gradient boosting models, which were evaluated on 16 datasets and 94 endpoints, comprising 1.4 million compounds in total. Our results show that XGBoost generally achieves the best predictive performance, while LightGBM requires the least training time, especially for larger datasets. In terms of feature importance, the models surprisingly rank molecular features differently, reflecting differences in regularization techniques and decision tree structures. Thus, expert knowledge must always be employed when evaluating data-driven explanations of bioactivity. Furthermore, our results show that the relevance of each hyperparameter varies greatly across datasets and that it is crucial to optimize as many hyperparameters as possible to maximize the predictive performance. In conclusion, our study provides the first set of guidelines for cheminformatics practitioners to effectively train, optimize and evaluate gradient boosting models for virtual screening and QSAR applications.

Tuning gradient boosting for imbalanced bioassay modelling with custom loss functions.

While in the last years there has been a dramatic increase in the number of available bioassay datasets, many of them suffer from extremely imbalanced distribution between active and inactive compounds. Thus, there is an urgent need for novel approaches to tackle class imbalance in drug discovery. Inspired by recent advances in computer vision, we investigated a panel of alternative loss functions for imbalanced classification in the context of Gradient Boosting and benchmarked them on six datasets from public and proprietary sources, for a total of 42 tasks and 2 million compounds. Our findings show that with these modifications, we achieve statistically significant improvements over the conventional cross-entropy loss function on five out of six datasets. Furthermore, by employing these bespoke loss functions we are able to push Gradient Boosting to match or outperform a wide variety of previously reported classifiers and neural networks. We also investigate the impact of changing the loss function on training time and find that it increases convergence speed up to 8 times faster. As such, these results show that tuning the loss function for Gradient Boosting is a straightforward and computationally efficient method to achieve state-of-the-art performance on imbalanced bioassay datasets without compromising on interpretability and scalability.