Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(8): 1679-1698, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765329

ABSTRACT

Fluorescence-guided surgery is an emerging and promising operative adjunct to assist the surgeon in various aspects of oncosurgery, ranging from assessing perfusion, identification, and characterization of tumors and peritoneal metastases, mapping of lymph nodes/leaks, and assistance for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). This study aims to provide an overview of principles, currently available dyes, platforms, and surgical applications and summarizes the available literature on the utility of FGS with a focus on abdomino-thoracic malignancies.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/surgery , Optical Imaging , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Fluorescence , Fluorescent Dyes , Humans , Indocyanine Green , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Selection
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(7): 1547-1557, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33650697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery to upfront surgery (surgery alone) in patients with resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (esophageal cancer [EC]), and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in a limited resource setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2010 through December 2016) who underwent surgery for EC and GEJ cancers. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients were included and categorized into the following groups: nCT (n = 65), nCRT (n = 152) and upfront surgery (n = 237). Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for two-thirds and one-third of the cases, respectively. nCRT group patients were also noted to have smaller tumors, lower margin positivity and a higher R0 resection rates. With a median follow up of 76 months (35-118 months) improved 5-year overall survival was noted in nCRT group in comparison to nCT and upfront surgery groups (56.5% vs. 34% and 35%, respectively, p = .021). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study demonstrate the beneficial effect of nCRT for patients with EC and GEJ in a limited resource setting. Further studies are required to analyze and promote the benefits of nCRT in limited-resource settings.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol ; 8(5): 628-634, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259658

ABSTRACT

Young women form a unique cohort in breast cancer, with evidence suggesting a later stage at presentation with more aggressive cancers. We aimed at evaluating the prognostic significance of young age and the impact of stage and molecular subtypes on survival. We conducted an audit of a prospectively maintained database at our institute between 2010 and 2014. All women with available receptor status and documented follow-up were included. The young breast cancer (YBC) cohort comprised 103 women and 230 women constituted the comparator arm (45-55 years). The median follow-up was 4 years. The YBC had a higher incidence of hormone negative tumors (61.1% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.012, significant [S]); however, both groups were similar in their stage at presentation. On classification into luminal subtypes, triple negative breast cancer was more common in the YBC cohort (50.5% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.001, S). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly worse in the YBC cohort (70.3% vs. 78%, p = 0.03, S). This detriment appeared to be significantly more in women presenting with operable breast cancer (77.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.012, S). Among the Luminal subtypes, there was no significant difference in the DFS between the two groups. Young age is a negative prognostic factor among women presenting with breast cancer. Further studies are required to evaluate whether any specific stage or molecular sub-type is particularly vulnerable to a poor outcome despite treatment.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...