ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Children with nocturnal enuresis (n = 91) selected by school doctors in The Netherlands from 1991 to 1994 were included in a study to assess the course of behavioural problems especially when the children became dry after the Dry Bed Training (DBT) programme. The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) questionnaire was completed by 88 parents (96%) prior to DBT (T1) and by 83 parents (91%) 6 mo after DBT (T2). The mean CBCL total problem score at T1: 24.0 (range 2-91, SD 16) was significantly higher than that of a Dutch norm group: 20.45, (p=0.025). Compared to T1, the mean CBCL total problem score at T2 was 16.8 (range 0-73; SD 14.7; p < 0.0001). Of the children with CBCL total problem scores at T1 in the borderline or clinical range, 92% became dry and 58% improved to the normal range. At T2, the children seemed to have less internal distress, fewer problems with other people, and were less anxious and/or depressed. CONCLUSION: Children with behavioural/emotional problems who wet their beds need not first be treated for their behavioural/emotional problems. Bedwetting can be treated successfully with DBT when other treatments such as normal alarm treatment have failed, and alarm treatment/DBT can have a positive influence on behavioural/emotional problems.
Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , Child Behavior Disorders/complications , Child Behavior Disorders/therapy , Enuresis/complications , Enuresis/therapy , Toilet Training , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/psychology , Enuresis/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Psychological Tests , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine how many bed-wetting children aged 5-7 years unlearn the habit using the alarm treatment. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, the Netherlands. METHODS: The population consisted of all children aged 5 to 7 with nocturnal enuresis (defined as > or = 2 wettings per week) who ordered an Elther alarm set (Elther BV, Tilburg) in May or June 1996 (n = III). The parents and the child were asked to keep notes during the treatment of whether the child had remained dry and of whether the alarm had sounded. When at the time of cessation of the alarm training the results were insufficient, the parents were asked about the reason to stop. When the child had remained dry for 14 nights in succession (the definition of 'success'), a questionnaire was sent 6 months later to inquire if the child was still dry or had relapsed. RESULTS: The totals of success for children aged 5, 6 and 7 years were 70% (n = 7/10), 73% (n = 29/40) and 90% (n = 55/61), respectively. Seven-year-olds were significantly more successful than the children aged 5 or 6 (p = 0.02). No significant correlations were found between results of treatment and sex, the nature of the enuresis (purely functional or not), familial occurrence and frequency of bed-wetting at the start of the treatment. The average times until success were 53 days for the 5-year-olds (range: 31-78), 65 days for the 6-year-olds (26-154) and 59 for the 7-year-olds (17-141). The proportions of relapse after 6 months were 0%, 14% and 9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Alarm training with pad and buzzer appears to be a suitable method of treatment even for children younger than 8 years.
