ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Because mobile telephones may support video calls, emergency medical dispatchers may now connect visually with bystanders during pre-hospital cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We studied the quality of simulated dispatcher-assisted CPR when guidance was delivered to rescuers by video calls or audio calls from mobile phones. METHODS: One hundred and eighty high school students were randomly assigned in groups of three to communicate via video calls or audio calls with experienced nurse dispatchers at a Hospital Emergency Medical Dispatch Center. CPR was performed on a recording resuscitation manikin during simulated cardiac arrest. Quality of CPR and time factors were compared depending on the type of communication used. RESULTS: The median CPR time without chest compression ('hands-off time') was shorter in the video-call group vs. the audio-call group (303 vs. 331 s; P=0.048), but the median time to first compression was not shorter (104 vs. 102 s; P=0.29). The median time to first ventilation was insignificantly shorter in the video-call group (176 vs. 205 s; P=0.16). This group also had a slightly higher proportion of ventiliations without error (0.11 vs. 0.06; P=0.30). CONCLUSION: Video communication is unlikely to improve telephone CPR (t-CPR) significantly without proper training of dispatchers and when using dispatch protocols written for audio-only calls. Improved dispatch procedures and training for handling video calls require further investigation.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/instrumentation , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Cell Phone/instrumentation , Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems , Heart Arrest/therapy , Video Recording/instrumentation , Video Recording/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Pulmonary VentilationABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether digitized analog images displayed on a digital workstation can be improved by using a preprocessing algorithm, and if so, whether the quality of the resulting images can reach that of the original films. The material contained 120 difficult cases (about 50% with selected pathology). Four radiologists each evaluated half of the randomly ordered cases with the digital workstation and half of the cases with the original radiographs. The data were compared with a previous similar study, where the workstation had no option for preprocessed images. Preprocessed digital images were clearly superior to digital images without preprocessing, although for those of the highest diagnostic difficulty they were inferior to the original films. The preprocessing algorithm has improved the diagnostic quality of the digital workstation. There is room yet for improvement compared to plain films, although the current setup may be sufficient in some settings.
Subject(s)
Computer Terminals , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Teleradiology/methods , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Observer Variation , ROC Curve , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Abdominal , Radiography, Thoracic , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We have used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare screen assessment of digitized radiographic films transmitted by a teleradiology system, with evaluation of the original radiographs on film. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The material contained 120 cases (about 50% with selected pathology) that were difficult to diagnose. Four radiologists each evaluated half of the cases on film, and half on computer screen. The screen display was 1024 x 836 pixels with 8 bits/pixel. RESULTS: We found the accuracy and sensitivity of the teleradiology system to be clearly inferior to film evaluation. CONCLUSION: Improvement is needed both in the teleradiology system, and in the training of radiologists to work on the electronic workstation.
