New photobiomodulation device for prevention and cure of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and dermatitis: results of the prospective Safe PBM study.

PURPOSE: The study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of CareMin650, a new photobiomodulation device, in patients treated by radiotherapy (RT) and to collect preliminary data on efficacy for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM) and radiation dermatitis (RD). METHODS: Safe PBM is a French, multicentric, prospective, non-comparative study which include patients with head and neck cancer (H&NC, cohort A) or breast cancer (BC, cohort B) treated in prophylactic (cohorts A1 and B1) or curative setting (cohort A2 and B2). Prophylactic treatment was administered from D1 to end of RT, at a dose of 3 J/cm2. Curative treatment started when a grade 1 to grade 3 lesion had occurred and was pursued until end of RT. Primary endpoint was incidence of device-related adverse events (AEs). OM and RD lesions were graded according to CTCAE V3. RESULTS: Overall, 72 patients were included (22, 9, 23, and 18 in cohorts A1, A2, B1, and B2, respectively). No device-related AE was reported after 1312 CareMin650 sessions. In cohorts A1 and B1, median time to first OM or RD lesion was 20 days. One BC patient developed G3 RD after completion of RT and discontinuation of CareMin650. Four H&NC patients developed G3 OM. In cohorts A2 and B2, lesions improved or stabilized in 71% of patients. Rates of satisfaction were high among patients and users. CONCLUSION: CareMin650 is feasible, safe, and well tolerated for preventive or curative treatment of OM and RD in cancer patients treated with RT. Preliminary efficacy results are promising.

Is There a Benefit of Oxaliplatin in Combination with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? An Updated Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine (5FU or capecitabine)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been considered the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Whether addition of oxaliplatin (OXP) will further improve clinical outcomes is still unclear. METHODS: To identify clinical trials combining oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT or perioperative chemotherapy for LARC published until March 2021, we searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library. We also searched for relevant ASCO conference abstracts. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Data were extracted from every study to perform a meta-analysis using Review Manager (version 5.3). RESULTS: A total of seven randomized clinical trials (ACCORD-12, CARO-AIO-04, FOWARC, JIAO, NSABP, PETACC-6, and STAR-01) with 5782 stage II or III rectal cancer patients were analyzed, including 2727 patients with OXP + 5FU regimen and 3055 patients with 5FU alone. Compared with the 5FU alone group, the OXP + 5FU regimen improved DFS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99, p = 0.03) and pathologic complete response (pCR) (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.37, p = 0.002). Patients treated with the OXP + 5FU regimen had significantly less metastatic progression (OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94; p = 0.007). Considering adverse events (AEs), there was more grade 3-4 diarrhea with OXP + 5FU (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.74-3.32, p < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87-1.57, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis with long-term results from the randomized studies showed a benefit of the addition of OXP + 5FU regiment in terms of DFS, metastatic progression, and pCR rate that did not translate to improved OS.

Integration of a Radiosensitivity Molecular Signature Into the Assessment of Local Recurrence Risk in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Recently, we developed radiosensitivity (RSI), a clinically validated molecular signature that estimates tumor radiosensitivity. In the present study, we tested whether integrating RSI with the molecular subtype refines the classification of local recurrence (LR) risk in breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: RSI and molecular subtype were evaluated in 343 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy that included whole-breast radiation therapy with or without a tumor bed boost (dose range 45-72 Gy). The follow-up period for patients without recurrence was 10 years. The clinical endpoint was LR-free survival. RESULTS: Although RSI did not uniformly predict for LR across the entire cohort, combining RSI and the molecular subtype identified a subpopulation with an increased risk of LR: triple negative (TN) and radioresistant (reference TN-radioresistant, hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.92, P=.02). TN patients who were RSI-sensitive/intermediate had LR rates similar to those of luminal (LUM) patients (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.47-1.57, P=.63). On multivariate analysis, combined RSI and molecular subtype (P=.004) and age (P=.001) were the most significant predictors of LR. In contrast, integrating RSI into the LUM subtype did not identify additional risk groups. We hypothesized that radiation dose escalation was affecting radioresistance in the LUM subtype and serving as a confounder. An increased radiation dose decreased LR only in the luminal-resistant (LUM-R) subset (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-0.98, P=.03). On multivariate analysis, the radiation dose was an independent variable only in the LUMA/B-RR subset (HR 0.025, 95% CI 0.001-0.946, P=.046), along with age (P=.008), T stage (P=.004), and chemotherapy (P=.008). CONCLUSIONS: The combined molecular subtype-RSI identified a novel molecular subpopulation (TN and radioresistant) with an increased risk of LR after breast-conserving therapy. We propose that the combination of RSI and molecular subtype could be useful in guiding radiation therapy-based decisions in breast cancer.

Prospective and comparative evaluation of the toxicity of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The lack of pathologic breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), a negative prognostic factor, has prompted the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy. This study aims to investigate prospectively the toxicities of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients treated for breast cancer between 1997 and 2002 by NCT, surgery, and radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy, were matched on age, body mass index (BMI), treatment period, treated side, and surgery type. Late toxicity was prospectively evaluated according to the CTCAE v3.0. Acute toxicity was derived from the medical charts. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were matched. Median follow-up was 10 years. Acute toxicity was higher in the chemoradiotherapy group compared with the radiotherapy alone group: 37% patients versus 10% experienced a grade 2/3 epithelitis (P=0.002); 48% versus 8% experienced a grade ≥1 mucositis (P=0.00001). Late toxicity was not significantly different in both univariate (51% vs. 49%; P=0.79) and multivariate analyses adjusted on the BMI (P=0.08). In univariate analysis, only the BMI tended to be predictive of toxicity (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy after NCT and surgery was associated with increased acute toxicity but not long-term toxicity. The efficacy of this therapeutic strategy should be evaluated to better define its indications.

Concurrent use of aromatase inhibitors and hypofractionated radiation therapy.

AIM: To retrospectively assess the acute and long-term toxicity using aromatase inhibitors (AI) therapy concurrently with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in breast cancer patients. METHODS: From November 1999 to October 2007, 66 patients were treated with breast HFRT and concurrent AI. In 63 patients (95.5%), HFRT delivered a total dose of 32.5 Gy to the whole breast within 5 wk (five fractions, one fraction per week). Other fractionations were chosen in three patients for the patients' personal convenience. A subsequent boost to the tumor bed was delivered in 35 patients (53.0%). Acute toxicities were scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v3. Late toxicity was defined as any toxicity occurring more than 6 mo after completion of HFRT and was scored according to the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force-Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic scale. RESULTS: At the end of the HFRT course, 19 patients (28.8%) had no irradiation-related toxicity. Acute grade 1-2 epithelitis was observed in 46 patients (69.7%). One grade 3 toxicity (1.5%) was observed. With a median follow-up of 34 mo (range: 12-94 mo), 31 patients (47%) had no toxicity, and 35 patients (53%) presented with grade 1-2 fibrosis. No grade 3 or greater delayed toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: We found that AI was well tolerated when given concurrently with HFRT. All toxicities were mild to moderate, and no treatment disruption was necessary. Further prospective assessment is warranted.

Respective prognostic value of genomic grade and histological proliferation markers in early stage (pN0) breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Genomic grade (GG) is a 97-gene signature which improves the accuracy and prognostic value of histological grade (HG) in invasive breast carcinoma. Since most of the genes included in the GG are involved in cell proliferation, we performed a retrospective study to compare the prognostic value of GG, Mitotic Index and Ki67 score. METHODS: A series of 163 consecutive breast cancers was retained (pT1-2, pN0, pM0, 10-yr follow-up). GG was computed using MapQuant Dx(R). RESULTS: GG was low (GG-1) in 48%, high (GG-3) in 31% and equivocal in 21% of cases. For HG-2 tumors, 50% were classified as GG-1, 18% as GG-3 whereas 31% remained equivocal. In a subgroup of 132 ER+/HER2- tumors GG was the most significant prognostic factor in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and tumor size (HR = 5.23, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a reference comprehensive cancer center setting, compared to histological grade, GG added significant information on cell proliferation in breast cancers. In patients with HG-2 carcinoma, applying the GG to guide the treatment scheme could lead to a reduction in adjuvant therapy prescription. However, based on the results observed and considering (i) the relatively close prognostic values of GG and Ki67, (ii) the reclassification of about 30% of HG-2 tumors as Equivocal GG and (iii) the economical and technical requirements of the MapQuant micro-array GG test, the availability in the near future of a PCR-based Genomic Grade test with improved performances may lead to an introduction in clinical routine of this test for histological grade 2, ER positive, HER2 negative breast carcinoma.

Search for a gene expression signature of breast cancer local recurrence in young women.

PURPOSE: A gene expression signature, predictive for local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment, has previously been identified from a series of 165 young patients with breast cancer. We evaluated this signature on both another platform and an independent series, compared its performance with other published gene-sets, and investigated the gene expression profile of a larger data set. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Gene expression tumor profiles were obtained on 148 of the initial 165 Dutch patients and on an independent validation series of 195 French patients. Both unsupervised and supervised classifications were used to study the gene expression profile of the 343 breast cancers and to identify subgroups that differ for their risk of local recurrence. RESULTS: The previous local recurrence signature was validated across platforms. However, when applied to the French patients, the signature did not reproduce its reported performance and did not better classify the patients than other published gene sets. Hierarchical clustering of all 343 breast cancers did not show any grouping reflecting local recurrence status. Genes related to proliferation were found differentially expressed between patients with or without local recurrence only in triple-negative tumors. Supervised classification revealed no significant gene set predictive for local recurrence or able to outperform classification based on clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although the previously identified local recurrence signature was robust on another platform, we were neither able to validate it on an independent data set, nor able to define a strong gene expression classifier for local recurrence using a larger data set. We conclude that there are no significant differences in gene expression pattern in tumors from patients with and without local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment.

Radiotherapy for stage II and stage III breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy and mastectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in Stage II-III breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Of 1,054 breast cancer patients treated with NAC at our institution between 1990 and 2004, 134 had pN0 status after NAC and mastectomy. The demographic data, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, and treatments were prospectively recorded. The effect of PMRT on locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by multivariate analysis, including known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the 134 eligible patients, 78 (58.2%) received PMRT and 56 (41.8%) did not. At a median follow-up time of 91.4 months, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and OS rate was 96.2% and 88.3% with PMRT and 92.5% and 94.3% without PMRT, respectively (p = NS). The corresponding values at 10 years were 96.2% and 77.2% with PMRT and 86.8% and 87.7% without PMRT (p = NS). On multivariate analysis, PMRT had no effect on either locoregional recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.61; p = .18) or OS (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-6; p = .18). This remained true in the subgroups of patients with clinical Stage II or Stage III disease at diagnosis. A trend was seen toward poorer OS among patients who had not had a pathologic complete in-breast tumor response after NAC (hazard ratio, 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-54.12; p = .076). CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present retrospective study showed no increase in the risk of distant metastasis, locoregional recurrence, or death when PMRT was omitted in breast cancer patients with pN0 status after NAC and mastectomy. Whether the omission of PMRT is acceptable for these patients should be addressed prospectively.

Locoregional treatment for breast carcinoma after Hodgkin's lymphoma: the breast conservation option.

PURPOSE: To report clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcome of breast cancer (BC) after irradiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in women treated at the Institut Curie, with a special focus on the breast-conserving option. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medical records of 72 women who developed either ductal carcinoma in situ or Stage I-III invasive carcinoma of the breast after HL between 1978 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Median age at HL diagnosis was 23 years (range, 14-53 years). Median total dose received by the mediastinum was 40 Gy, mostly by a mantle-field technique. Breast cancers occurred after a median interval of 21 years (range, 5-40 years). Ductal invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ represented, respectively, 51 cases (71%) and 14 cases (19%). Invasive BCs consisted of 47 cT0-2 tumors (82%), 5 cN1-3 tumors (9%), and 20 Grade 3 tumors (35%). Locoregional treatment for BCs consisted of mastectomy with (3) or without (36) radiotherapy in 39 patients and lumpectomy with (30) or without (2) adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 patients. The isocentric lateral decubitus radiation technique was used in 17 patients after breast-conserving surgery (57%). With a median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year overall survival rate and locoregional control rate were, respectively, 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 72-93%) for invasive carcinoma and 100% (95% CI, 100 -100%) and 92% (95% CI, 79-100%) for in situ carcinoma. In patients with invasive tumors, the 5-year distant disease-free survival rate was 79% (95% CI, 69-91%), and 13 patients died of progressive BC. Contralateral BC was diagnosed in 10 patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving treatment can be an option for BCs that occur after HL, despite prior thoracic irradiation. It should consist of lumpectomy and adjuvant breast radiotherapy with use of adequate techniques, such as the lateral decubitus isocentric position, to protect the underlying heart and lung.

Preoperative radio-chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: long-term results of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of concurrent radio- (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) in the preoperative setting for operable, non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) not amenable to initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2003, 59 women were included. CT consisted of four cycles of 5-FU, 500 mg/m(2)/d, continuous infusion (d1-d5) and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2) (d1 and d6). Starting concurrently with the second cycle, RT delivered 50 Gy to the breast and 46 Gy to the internal mammary and supra/infra-clavicular areas. Breast surgery and lymph node dissection were then performed. Adjuvant treatment consisted of a 16 Gy boost to the tumor bed after BCS, FEC (four cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), and epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), d1; d21) for pN1-3 and hormone-therapy for positive hormone receptors BC. RESULTS: The in-breast pathological complete response rate was 27%. BCS was performed in 41 (69%) pts. Overall and distant-disease free survivals at 5 years were respectively 88% [95% CI 80-98] and 83% [95% CI 74-93] whereas locoregional and local controls were 90% [95% CI 82-97] and 97% [95% CI 92-100]. Late toxicity (CTCAE-V3) was assessed in 51 pts (86%) with a median follow-up of 7 years [5-8]. Four (8%) experienced at least one grade III toxicities (one telangectasia and three fibroses). Cosmetic results, assessed in 35 of the 41 pts (85%) who retained their breasts, were poor in four pts (11%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative concurrent administration of RT and CT is an effective regimen. Long-term toxicity is moderate. This association deserves further evaluations in prospective trials.

Preliminary experience of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases previously treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.

We report our experience of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (BBCT) followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with inoperable brain metastases (BM) or who refused surgery. This is a retrospective study of seven metastatic BC pts treated at the Institut Curie with at least one course of BBCT before WBRT, with a delay of ≤ 12 months between the two treatments. Toxicity was scored according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (v4. 2010). Median age was 56 years (41-65). Median follow-up was 5.9 months (0.4-24.6). The median dose of bevacizumab was 10 mg/kg. Median number of cycles BBCT was six (5-17). Different chemotherapy regimens were used, the most common combination was paclitaxel-bevacizumab. WBRT was delivered in ten fractions, five fractions/week, for two weeks, to a total of 30 Gy. One pt underwent stereotactic radio surgery (SRS) after WBRT. No pt received BBCT during RT. Most common reported side-effects were nausea (n = 4), headache (n = 3), vomiting (n = 1), and vertigo (n = 3). All pts had mild or moderate grade ≤ 2 neurologic toxicity. There were no radiological signs of necrosis or cerebral ischemia. BBCT before WBRT was not associated with severe brain toxicity. Because of the limited number of pts, the different BBCT regimens, and important delays between treatments, these results must be confirmed prospectively.

The molecular subtype classification is a determinant of sentinel node positivity in early breast carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Several authors have underscored a strong relation between the molecular subtypes and the axillary status of breast cancer patients. The aim of our work was to decipher the interaction between this classification and the probability of a positive sentinel node biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our dataset consisted of a total number of 2654 early-stage breast cancer patients. Patients treated at first by conservative breast surgery plus sentinel node biopsies were selected. A multivariate logistic regression model was trained and validated. Interaction covariate between ER and HER2 markers was a forced input of this model. The performance of the multivariate model in the training and the two validation sets was analyzed in terms of discrimination and calibration. Probability of axillary metastasis was detailed for each molecular subtype. RESULTS: The interaction covariate between ER and HER2 status was a stronger predictor (p = 0.0031) of positive sentinel node biopsy than the ER status by itself (p = 0.016). A multivariate model to determine the probability of sentinel node positivity was defined with the following variables; tumour size, lympho-vascular invasion, molecular subtypes and age at diagnosis. This model showed similar results in terms of discrimination (AUC = 0.72/0.73/0.72) and calibration (HL p = 0.28/0.05/0.11) in the training and validation sets. The interaction between molecular subtypes, tumour size and sentinel nodes status was approximated. DISCUSSION: We showed that biologically-driven analyses are able to build new models with higher performance in terms of breast cancer axillary status prediction. The molecular subtype classification strongly interacts with the axillary and distant metastasis process.

Can we decrease the skin reaction in breast cancer patients using hyaluronic acid during radiation therapy? Results of phase III randomised trial.

PURPOSE: Radio-induced early skin reactions still remain a clinical challenge. Preliminary results with Hyaluronic acid, one of the most recent topical products used in this indication are proving interesting. To evaluate the efficacy of Hyaluronic acid compared to placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients with grade 1-2 radio-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy were eligible. They were randomised to receive either hyaluronic acid (A) or a simple emollient (B). The primary endpoint was the clinical evaluation of the erythema (success versus failure). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of skin colorimetry, pain, and quality of life. RESULTS: Two-hundred patients were enrolled (A=99, B=101). Ninety-five patients per treatment arm could be evaluated. Failures occurred in 23 patients (24%) in the hyaluronic acid arm, and 32 (34%) in the emollient arm (p=0.15). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) prematurely stopped the treatment without any ensuing difference between the two arms. Body mass index and the size of the epithelitis were both independently associated with the failure of the local treatment. The relative reduction of colorimetric levels was 20% in the hyaluronic acid group, and 13% in the emollient group (p=0.46). Concerning the quality of life assessment, there was a trend towards a lower level of pain in patients receiving hyaluronic acid (p=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no significant difference between hyaluronic acid and simple emollient in the treatment of acute radio-induced dermatitis. There was however a trend towards an improvement in both pain level and skin colorimetry.

[Concurrent whole-brain radiotherapy with trastuzumab for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients: questions and answers]. / Association concomitante d'une irradiation encéphalique en totalité avec trastuzumab concomitant pour des métastases cérébrales d'un cancer du sein : questions et réponses.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively assessed the use of trastuzumab concurrently with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2001 to April 2007, 31 patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer were referred for WBRT with concurrent trastuzumab. In most cases, concurrent WBRT delivered 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions. In six patients, other fractionations were chosen because of either poor performance status or patients' convenience. RESULTS: At time of brain progression, median age was 55 years (range: 38 to 73 years) and all patients had a performance status of 0 to 2. Median time to brain progression was 10.5 months. Following WBRT, radiological responses were observed in 23 patients (74.2%), including six patients (19.4%) with complete radiological responses and 17 patients (54.8%) with partial radiological response. Clinical responses were observed in 27 patients (87.1%). Median survival from the start of WBRT was 18 months (range: two to 65 months). No grade 2 or more acute toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that trastuzumab concurrently with WBRT may have a potential clinical impact with low toxicity. Although promising, these preliminary data warrant further validation of trastuzumab as radio sensitizer for WBRT in brain metastases from breast cancer in the setting of a clinical trial. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Preliminary results of whole brain radiotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of trastuzumab concurrently with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 2001 and April 2007, 31 patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer were referred for WBRT with concurrent trastuzumab. At brain progression, the median age was 55 years (range, 38-73), and all patients had a performance status of 0-2. The patients received trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly (n = 17) or 6 mg/kg repeated every 21 days (n = 14). In 26 patients, concurrent WBRT delivered 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions. In 6 patients, other fractionations were chosen because of either poor performance status or patient convenience. RESULTS: After WBRT, radiologic responses were observed in 23 patients (74.2%), including 6 (19.4%) with a complete radiologic response and 17 (54.8%) with a partial radiologic response. Clinical responses were observed in 27 patients (87.1%). The median survival time from the start of WBRT was 18 months (range, 2-65). The median interval to brain progression was 10.5 months (range, 2-27). No Grade 2 or greater acute toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: The low toxicity of trastuzumab concurrently with WBRT should probably not justify delays. Although promising, these preliminary data warrant additional validation of trastuzumab as a potential radiosensitizer for WBRT in brain metastases from breast cancer in the setting of a clinical trial.

The acute skin and heart toxicity of a concurrent association of trastuzumab and locoregional breast radiotherapy including internal mammary chain: a single-institution study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the skin and heart toxicity of a concurrent adjuvant trastuzumab-radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC), especially in the case of internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of 106 patients treated between 06/2003 and 03/2007 by concurrent trastuzumab-radiotherapy for non-metastatic BC. Left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) was assessed at baseline, before and after radiotherapy and then every 4-6 months. All toxicities were evaluated using CTCAEV3. RESULTS: Median age was 52 years (25-76). Chemotherapy with anthracycline was administered in 92% of patients. All patients received trastuzumab every three weeks (8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg) for a median duration of 12 months (3-40). The IMC was irradiated in 83% of patients. There were: 87 grade 1, 14 grade 2 and 2 grade 3 skin reactions. There were 13 oesophagitis: 9 grade 1; 3 grade 2, and 1 grade 3. Out of 101 patients with assessments after 6 months, late telangiectasia grade 1 occurred in 5 patients, local pain grade 1 in 19 patients and grade 2 in 3 patients, fibrosis grade 1 in 16 patients. A reversible grade ≥2 left ventricular systolic dysfunction occurred in 6 patients. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study of breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-radiotherapy with, in most cases, anthracycline-based chemotherapy and IMC irradiation, both the rate of abnormal LVEF after concurrent trastuzumab-radiotherapy and the skin toxicity were deemed acceptable. Further follow-up is needed.

Management of inflammatory breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of breast surgery for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective series was based on 232 patients treated for IBC. All patients received primary chemotherapy followed by either exclusive radiotherapy (118 patients; 51%) or surgery with or without radiotherapy (114 patients; 49%). The median follow-up was 11 years. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable apart from fewer tumors <70 mm (43% vs. 33%, p = 0.003), a higher rate of clinical stage N2 (15% vs. 5%, p = 0.04), and fewer histopathologic Grade 3 tumors (46% vs. 61%, p <0.05) in the no-surgery group. The addition of surgery was associated with a significant improvement in locoregional disease control (p = 0.04) at 10 years locoregional free interval 78% vs. 59% but with no significant difference in overall survival rates or disease-free intervals. Late toxicities were not significantly different between the two treatment groups except for a higher rate of fibrosis in the no-surgery group (p <0.0001) and more lymphedema in the surgery group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an improvement in locoregional control in patients treated by surgery, in conjunction with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, for IBC. Efforts must be made to improve overall survival.

Cardiac toxicity in breast cancer patients: from a fractional point of view to a global assessment.

When focusing on heart disease, most available studies split the two different parts of the adjuvant treatment, i.e., systemic therapies and radiation therapy, making it difficult to implement efficient strategies for preventing treatment-induced cardiac toxicity. This paper reviews the current understanding of treatments-induced cardiac toxicity in a global approach. Many factors should be considered when assessing the cardiac hazard. Treatment-related risk factors include heart dose exposure, chemotherapy, targeted agents such as HER2 inhibitors, but also endocrine agents, or anesthetic procedure. Patients' characteristics should also be taken into account. Age, menopausal status, stress, previous history of cardiac disease, genetic profile, and body mass index could all impact on cardiac function after adjuvant therapies. Cardiac toxicity should not be analyzed as the consequence of a specific therapy, but should be considered as the result of additive or supra-additive toxicities. By this way, it will be possible to implement new strategies for preventing treatment-induced cardiac toxicity.

Is radiotherapy an option for early breast cancers with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

PURPOSE: To determine whether the exclusive use of radiotherapy (ERT) could be a treatment option after complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for early breast cancer (EBC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1985 and 1999, 1,477 patients received NCT for EBC considered too large for primary conservative surgery. Of 165 patients with cCR, 65 patients were treated with breast surgery (with radiotherapy) and 100 patients were treated with ERT. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics, except for larger initial tumor sizes in the ERT group. There were no significant differences in overall, disease-free and metastasis-free survival rates. Five-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 91% and 77% in the no-surgery group and 82% and 79% in the surgery group, respectively (p = 0.9). However, a nonsignificant trend toward higher locoregional recurrence rates (LRR) was observed in the no-surgery group (31% vs. 17% at 10 years; p = 0.06). In patients with complete responses on mammography and/or ultrasound, LRR were not significantly different (p = 0.45, 10-year LRR: 21% in surgery vs. 26% in ERT). No significant differences were observed in terms of the rate of cutaneous, cardiac, or pulmonary toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is a key component of locoregional treatment for breast cancers that achieved cCR to NCT.

Targeting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity for cancer therapy.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a ubiquitous protein modification found in mammalian cells that modulates many cellular responses, including DNA repair. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family catalyze the formation and addition onto proteins of negatively charged ADP-ribose polymers synthesized from NAD(+). The absence of PARP-1 and PARP-2, both of which are activated by DNA damage, results in hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation and alkylating agents. PARP inhibitors that compete with NAD(+) at the enzyme's activity site are effective chemo- and radiopotentiation agents and, in BRCA-deficient tumors, can be used as single-agent therapies acting through the principle of synthetic lethality. Through extensive drug-development programs, third-generation inhibitors have now entered clinical trials and are showing great promise. However, both PARP-1 and PARP-2 are not only involved in DNA repair but also in transcription regulation, chromatin modification, and cellular homeostasis. The impact on these processes of PARP inhibition on long-term therapeutic responses needs to be investigated.