Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
PLos ONE ; 11(10): 1-8, Out 25, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | RSDM, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1524644

ABSTRACT

Background In resource-limited countries, CD4 T-cell (CD4) testing continues to be used for determining antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation eligibility and opportunistic infection monitoring. To support expanded access to CD4 testing, simple and robust technologies are necessary. We conducted this study to evaluate the performance of a new Point-of-Care (POC) CD4 technology, the MyT4, compared to conventional laboratory CD4 testing. Methods EDTA venous blood from 200 HIV-positive patients was tested in the laboratory using the MyT4 and BD FACSCalibur™. Results The MyT4 had an r 2 of 0.82 and a mean bias of 12.3 cells/µl. The MyT4 had total misclassifications of 14.7% and 8.8% when analyzed using ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 cells/µl, respectively. Conclusions We conclude that the MyT4 performed well in classifying patients using the current ART initiation eligibility thresholds in Mozambique when compared to the conventional CD4 technology.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , CD4 Lymphocyte Count/instrumentation , Humans , HIV Infections/immunology , Child, Preschool , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , HIV Seropositivity , Allergy and Immunology , Men , Middle Aged , Mozambique
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL