Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 166(6 Pt 1): 1597-604; discussion 1604-6, 1992 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1615966

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of fresh versus frozen sperm in therapeutic donor insemination. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-seven women underwent 72 courses of treatment (a maximum of six therapeutic donor insemination cycles--three fresh and three frozen) totaling 198 cycles. Each woman served as her own control and was prospectively randomized to receive a single, timed insemination of either fresh or frozen sperm. RESULTS: Fecundity was 20.6% for fresh sperm cycles and 9.4% for frozen (p less than 0.03, by chi 2 analysis). Fresh cervical cap insemination fecundity was 20.3%; frozen was 7.8% (p less than 0.03, by chi 2 analysis). Fresh intrauterine insemination fecundity was 21.2%; frozen was 15.8% (p = 0.63, by chi 2 analysis). Fresh 3-month life-table pregnancy rates were 48% +/- 10%; frozen rates were 22% +/- 8% (p = 0.05 by Breslow analysis). Survival analysis with fixed covariates showed a positive association with the use of fresh sperm (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Cycle fecundity was significantly greater with fresh sperm in women undergoing cervical cap insemination or intrauterine insemination and in women undergoing only cervical cap insemination. These results have important implications for contemporary management of patients undergoing therapeutic donor insemination with frozen sperm.


Subject(s)
Freezing , Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous , Spermatozoa , Adult , Cell Survival , Female , Fertilization , Humans , Life Tables , Male , Prospective Studies , Sperm Count , Sperm Motility , Spermatozoa/physiology
2.
Fertil Steril ; 56(2): 361-3, 1991 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2070868

ABSTRACT

Intrauterine insemination by itself for multiple and/or severe infertility factors had no benefit over cervical cap with whole ejaculate or coitus in this study. The PRs for IUI and cervical cap with whole ejaculate or coitus were similar and low, suggesting that IUI by itself has limited, if any, utility in enhancing PRs in this type of infertility population. Couples attempting IUI should be advised about the low probability of achieving pregnancy. Ovulation stimulation and/or heterologous donor insemination, IVF, or gamete intrafallopian transfer may be beneficial therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female/therapy , Insemination, Artificial, Homologous/methods , Adult , Coitus , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Uterus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...