Craniovertebral junction instability as an extension of cocaine-induced midline destructive lesions: case report.

With the increasingly widespread illicit use of cocaine, a broad spectrum of clinical pathologies related to this form of drug abuse is emerging. The most frequently used method of administration of powdered cocaine is intranasal inhalation, or "snorting." Consequently, adverse effects of cocaine on the nasal tract are common. Habitual nasal insufflations of cocaine can cause mucosal lesions. If cocaine use becomes chronic and compulsive, progressive damage of the mucosa and perichondrium leads to ischemic necrosis of the septal cartilage and perforation of the nasal septum. Occasionally, cocaine-induced lesions cause extensive destruction of the osteocartilaginous structures of the nose, sinuses, and palate and can mimic other diseases such as tumors, infections, and immunological diseases. In the literature currently available, involvement of the craniovertebral junction in the cocaine-induced midline destructive lesions (CIMDLs) has never been reported. The present case concerns a 44-year-old man who presented with long-standing symptoms including nasal obstruction, epistaxis, dysphagia, nasal reflux, and severe neck pain. A diagnosis of CIMDL was made in light of the patient's history and the findings on physical and endoscopic examinations, imaging studies, and laboratory testing. Involvement of the craniovertebral junction in the destructive process was evident. For neurosurgical treatment, the authors considered the high grade of atlantoaxial instability, the poorly understood cocaine-induced lesions of the spine and their potential evolution overtime, as well as cocaine abusers' poor compliance. The patient underwent posterior craniovertebral fixation. Understanding, classifying, and treating cocaine-induced lesions involving the craniovertebral junction are a challenge.

Rilpivirine: drug profile of a second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase HIV-inhibitor.

Rilpivirine (RPV) is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) of the diarylpyrimidine family. RPV can be given once daily, is well absorbed and should be administered with food. It is eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism. Two phase III noninferiority trials (ECHO and THRIVE), compared RPV 25mg with efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg, both given once daily, and combined with 2NRTI backbone. At week 48, response rate for pooled data were 84 versus 82% (difference: 2%; 95% CI: -2.0 to 6.0%). EFV arms performed better than RPV arms when at higher baseline HIV RNA, so RPV was approved for treatment-naïve patients with HIV RNA below 100,000 copies/ml. Approximately 90% of viruses phenotypically resistant to RPV showed cross-resistance to ETR. Conversely, phenotypic analysis showed that in EFV arm, none were resistant to the second-generation NNRTIs. CD4 count increases were similar between groups, but RPV showed a lower rate of discontinuation due to adverse events and lower rates of central nervous system effects, rash and lipid abnormalities. Potency, tolerability and co-formulation in a single tablet (Eviplera(®), Complera(®)) make this drug a new and attractive option for the treatment of HIV.

Aetiological diagnosis in acute and recurrent pericarditis: when and how.

The cause of acute and recurrent pericarditis is often a major concern for the clinicians in clinical practice. Several possible causes of pericarditis can be listed, as the pericardium may be involved in a large number of systemic disorders or may be diseased, as an isolated process. The reported diagnostic yield of extensive laboratory evaluation and pericardiocentesis is low in the absence of cardiac tamponade or suspected neoplastic, tuberculous, and purulent pericarditis. Patients with pericarditis can be safely managed on an outpatient basis without a thorough diagnostic evaluation unless a specific cause is suspected or the patient has high-risk features, or both. A targeted aetiological search should be directed to the most common cause on the basis of the clinical background, epidemiological issues or specific presentations. In developed countries the clinicians should rule out neoplastic, tuberculous, and purulent pericarditis, as well as pericarditis related to a systemic disease.

Effect of adherence to HAART on virologic outcome and on the selection of resistance-conferring mutations in NNRTI- or PI-treated patients.

BACKGROUND: The effect of adherence on the risk of virologic failure and mutations selection was verified in a prospective study. METHOD: At baseline, all patients had a viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL and completed a self-reported questionnaire. Patients were followed for the subsequent 4 months to document virologic rebound (VL > 50 copies/mL). RESULTS: 1,133 patients completed 2,240 questionnaires/follow-up (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI] = 1,479; single protease inhibitor [PI] = 200; boosted PI = 561). Only the type of treatment and the baseline adherence rate were significantly associated with the virologic endpoint. A viral rebound rate >10% was observed in patients treated with single PI (14.7%) or boosted PI (11.7%) up to an adherence rate of 95%, whereas a similar (17.6%) rebound rate was observed only in NNRTI-treated patients with very low adherence (<55%). After adjustment for other baseline predictors of adherence, patients on NNRTIs showed a higher adherence rate than those on PIs but not higher than those on boosted PIs. The same adherence rate did not have the same result, in terms of virologic rebound, in patients on the same HAART for shorter or longer periods of time. Overall, the risk of virologic rebound for patients with >95% adherence rate was 6.2% in the first 6 months of therapy, lowered to 5.0% in the following 6 months, and was 3.2% thereafter. The risk of selecting for resistance-inducing viral mutation for NNRTI-treated patients was higher (4.9%) at very low adherence rates (<75%); the opposite was true for single PI-treated patients (4.2% for adherence >95%). Boosted PI-treated patients showed an intermediate pattern, even if at a much lower level of risk. CONCLUSION: Low adherence is a major determinant of virologic failure, however different therapies have different adherence cutoffs determining a significant increment of risk.

Prediction of Virologic Outcome of Salvage Antiretroviral Treatment by Different Systems for Interpreting Genotypic HIV Drug Resistance.

The authors assessed the predictive capacity of 3 rule-based algorithms (Bergamo, Stanford University, Rega Institute) for HIV genotypic interpretation. A total of 1132 postgenotypic regimens in 533 patients were considered. The genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) was strongly associated (P < .0001) with the virologic outcome (1 log HIV-RNA reduction). The 3 algorithms had a highly significant prediction efficiency. The Bergamo algorithm receiver-operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of >/=1 log HIV-RNA reduction was 0.753 (95% confidence interval, 0.725-0.781), testifying that the prediction was significantly different (P < .0001) from simple chance. The AUCs obtained by the 2 other systems were similar (0.752 Stanford; 0.741 Rega). The predictive capacity of the algorithms was not influenced by the type of antiviral drugs used. The 3 considered rule-based algorithms for the interpretation of HIV genotypic resistance yield congruent results and may effectively predict the virologic outcome of rescue therapy. Their use may help clinicians in interpreting mutational patterns and in making therapeutic choices.

Resistance costs and future drug options of antiretroviral therapies: analysis of the role of NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs in a large clinical cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate future drug options (FDOs), resistance cost (RCVF), and virologic response to genotypic-driven rescue highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), according to type of therapy. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis in naïve or antiretroviral-experienced patients. Virologic response was defined as HIV RNA <50 copies. RESULTS: There were 108 patients failing first-line HAART; there were 328 experienced patients. FDOs were reduced in subjects failing a thymidine-analogue (TA) regimen (median 3.65, IQR 1.29 ) compared to patients without TA (median 3.82, IQR 1.12) (p = .011). FDOs after first failure were higher for patients with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI; median 3.82; IQR 1.24) than with protease inhibitor (PI; median 3.64, IQR 1.15) (p = .027). In experienced patients, FDOs were much higher for TA (p = .005). Patients responding to genotypic-modified regimens had higher FDOs (median 3.9 4, IQR 2.53) than patients not responding (median 2.18, IQR 3.65) (p > .0001). Switching from an NNRTI-based HAART to a boosted PI had a higher chance (48.1%) of achieving a full virologic suppression, compared to switching from PI to NNRTI (21.4%, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: FDOs and RCVF are parameters that can quantify the therapeutic choices at virologic failure. Different drugs induce different FDOs and RCVF. In successive-line regimens, the higher antiviral effect and genetic barrier of boosted PIs may overcome the limits of using nucleoside reverse transcriptase backbones, with only partial effectiveness.

Reasons for discontinuation of nevirapine-containing HAART: results from an unselected population of a large clinical cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency of and predictive factors for nevirapine-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) discontinuation. METHODS: All patients receiving nevirapine as a component of HAART at our centre were retrospectively evaluated for efficacy and tolerability. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of baseline characteristics on the outcome and Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates to evaluate time-dependent variables. RESULTS: Between January 1999 and June 2006, 582 patients (72% males) received 744 nevirapine-based HAART regimens. Naive patients counted for 83 of these regimens; of the remaining 661 regimens administered to experienced patients, 306 were failing virologically and 355 were undergoing simplification strategies. A once-a-day schedule was used in 136 patients. The likelihood of maintaining the nevirapine-based regimen was statistically (P < 0.0001 in both cases) influenced by the patient's status (mean KM estimate of 812 days for virological failures, 1294 for naive patients and 1657 for treatment simplifications) and by the dosing schedule (once-daily 1315 days; twice-daily 1198 days). The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was resistance (17.5%) followed by reduced tolerability (16.3%), patient's decision (14%) and treatment strategies such as structured treatment interruptions (13.8%). During 10.2% of treatments, a grade 3 or greater increase in aminotransferase levels was observed, reflecting an overall incidence rate equal to 5.3 cases per 100 person-years. This lead to treatment discontinuation in 3.9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Nevirapine, especially when used in simplification strategies, enables doctors to extend the use of HAART over a long period of time. The risk of drug-induced hepatotoxicity is low, but nevirapine should be used with caution in patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus or with elevated liver function tests. As with any decision to prescribe a drug, a careful evaluation of the potential risks and benefits of using nevirapine must be made for each individual.

Nosocomial bloodstream infections among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: incidence and risk factors.

To assess the incidence of nosocomial bloodstream infections (NBSIs) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, and to analyze the main associated risk factors, we performed a 1-year multicenter prospective study of patients with advanced HIV infection who were consecutively admitted to 17 Italian infectious diseases wards. As of May 1999, a total of 65 NBSIs (4.7%) occurred in 1379 admissions, for an incidence of 2.45 NBSIs per 1000 patient-days. Twenty-nine NBSIs were catheter-related bloodstream infections, with a rate of 9.6 central venous catheter-associated infections per 1000 device-days. Multivariate analysis indicated that variables independently associated with NBSIs included active injection drug use, a Karnofsky Performance Status score of <40, presence of a central venous catheter, and length of hospital stay. Mortality rates were 24.6% and 7.2% among patients with and without NBSIs, respectively (P<.00001). In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, NBSIs continue to occur frequently and remain severe and life-threatening manifestations.