Efficacy and safety of cilazapril in elderly patients with essential hypertension. A multicenter study.

The efficacy and safety of cilazapril monotherapy was evaluated in a multicenter, open-label, ascending-dose titration study in 83 elderly essential hypertensive patients. After a four-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients received 1 mg of cilazapril once daily for the first four weeks. This dose was then increased to 2.5 mg once daily for the next four weeks for patients whose pre-dose sitting diastolic blood pressure was above 90 mm Hg. Similarly, at Week 8 the dose was increased in such patients from 1 to 2.5 mg or from 2.5 to 5 mg once daily. A 12-hour blood pressure profile was performed on the first day of active treatment and of each dose increase. Mean decrease of sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline (102.7 +/- 0.4 mm Hg) at Week 12 was 13.3 +/- 1.1 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). Seventy-five percent of patients had a decrease of 10 mm Hg or more from baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure, and in 60 percent sitting diastolic blood pressure normalized. Unexpectedly large decreases of blood pressure after the first dose were seen only in three patients and none had clinical symptoms. Fourteen patients (16.9 percent) reported adverse events, but most of these were judged unlikely to be related to therapy. Four patients with predisposing underlying diseases experienced potentially serious adverse events (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and blood pressure elevation) whose relationship to therapy was judged remote or only possible. There was no particular pattern of changes in laboratory values. The results indicate that cilazapril is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug for the elderly.

[Clinical and laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of parenteral nutritional support in malnourished elderly]. / Valutazione clinica e laboratoristica dell'efficacia di un supporto nutrizionale per via parenterale nei deperimenti organici dell'anziano.

The study was carried out on twenty nine geriatric patients with malnutrition of variable aetiology. The effectiveness of a temporary parenteral nutritional supplement was evaluated both clinically and by means of some metabolic indexes: nitrogen balance, serum albumin, blood electrolytes, acid-base parameters, hemocytometry. The treatment was devoid of metabolic complications, and promoted a positive nitrogen balance as well as clinical improvement in most patients.

Fipexide, an effective cognition activator in the elderly: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

Forty geriatric in-patients with severe cognition disorders were randomly allocated to treatment with either 600 mg fipexide daily or placebo over a period of 3 weeks. Before and after treatment, the symptoms of cognitive performance (disorders of memory and attention, asthenia, apathy and disorders of coenaesthesia) were monitored and scored. Similarly, the Thurstone test (symbol matching test) was performed and time to completion, number of errors and exactitude index were recorded. Haemodynamics, haematology and haematochemistry investigations were made before and after treatment, and accessory symptoms of potential side-reactions were monitored by positive questioning. Treatment with fipexide was associated with a significant improvement in each and all monitored symptoms and signs to an average extent of 60%, whereas placebo was not. Similarly, the patients given fipexide experienced a significant improvement in the Thurstone test, in terms of time to completion (-22%), number of errors (-46%) and exactitude index (+60%); again, placebo was not associated with any significant improvement (variations, respectively, of -5%, -14%, and +24%). Overall, 85% of the patients given fipexide experienced clinical improvement to a greater or lesser degree, a significantly greater proportion than that associated with placebo (25%; p less than 0.001). Tolerance, both subjective and objective, was good in both treatment groups.

[Comparative study of the frequency of 6 primitive reflexes in a hospitalized population of aged patients]. / Studio comparativo della frequenza di 6 riflessi primitivi in una popolazione ospedalizzata di età geriatrica.

110 elderly patients, 57 with and 53 without acquired neurological lesions, were examined for the presence of the grasping, snout, sucking, palmomental, glabellar and bulldog reflexes. The results were statistically analyzed by means of the chi2 method. The percentages of the positive reflex responses, although not negligible in the neurologically healthy patients, turned out far higher in the patients with organic cerebral disorders. With the exception of the sucking and palmomental reflexes, these differences appeared statistically significant. As for the neurological diagnosis, diffuse lesions proved themselves more crucial than focal ones. The conclusion is drawn that primitive reflexes should be regarded abnormal only in the context of an overt cerebral pathology.

Glucosamine sulphate: a controlled clinical investigation in arthrosis.

Efficacy and tolerance of a new preparation of pure glucosamine sulphate, in injectable and oral form, were investigated in 30 patients with osteoarthrosis. Two groups of in-patients with chronic degenerative articular disorders received daily for 7 days either 400 mg glucosamine sulphate or a piperazine/chlorbutanol combination by intravenous or intramuscular injection. During the 2 following weeks, the patients receiving glucosamine had oral glucosamine capsules (6 x 250 mg daily); the other group had placebo. Efficacy was tested by semi-quantitative scoring of pain at rest and during active and passive movements, as well as limitation of articular function, before and after 7 and 21 days of treatment. Patients were positively questioned daily for possible intolerance symptoms. Haematology, circulatory data and urine analysis were tested before and after treatment. During both initial parenteral treatments, each symptom significantly improved, but to a faster and greater extent in the group treated with glucosamine. During the maintenance period, a further improvement was recorded in the patients treated with glucosamine, whereas in those on placebo the symptom scores increased almost to the pre-treatment level. This was considered the major difference between basic therapy, such as with glucosamine, as purely symptomatic treatment. Clinical and biological tolerance were excellent with both treatments, and no definitely drug-related complaints were recorded. It is suggested that parenteral and/or oral treatment with pure glucosamine sulphate should be considered as basic therapy for the management of primary or secondary degenerative osteoarthrosis disorders.