Treatment regimen and hypnotic self-administration.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that insomniacs self-administer hypnotics at high nightly rates. This study determined whether prior experience with different treatment regimens (i.e., instructions and capsule availability) would alter the previously observed high hypnotic self-administration rates. METHODS: Sixty-four healthy men and women with (n = 32) and without (n = 32) insomnia, 21-55 years, self administered placebo or triazolam (0.25 mg) after different prior treatment regimens. They received one of three different treatment regimens enforced for 11 nights: a capsule each night, a capsule as needed, or a capsule every third night. On 14 subsequent nights they choose to self-administer a capsule or not, placebo during 1 week and triazolam (0.25 mg) the other (counterbalanced in order). RESULTS: Insomniacs self-administered more capsules than normals and triazolam was self-administered more than placebo. For both groups, treatment regimen had a minimal effect on capsule self-administration. During the treatment phase, triazolam improved self-ratings of sleep relative to placebo. During the choice phase, nightly variations in self-rated sleep predicted self-administration of a capsule on the following night, regardless of whether the capsule was active drug or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The data of this study are consistent with the view that hypnotic self-administration by insomniacs is therapy-seeking behavior and not drug abuse.

Effects of rapid versus slow accumulation of eight hours of sleep loss.

The present study assessed alertness, memory, and performance following three schedules of approximately 8 hr of sleep loss (slow, intermediate, and rapid accumulation) in comparison to an 8-hr time in bed (TIB) sleep schedule. Twelve healthy individuals aged 21-35 completed each of four conditions according to a Latin Square design: no sleep loss (8-hr TIB for 4 nights; 2300-0700), slow (6-hr TIB for 4 nights; 0100-0700), intermediate (4-hr TIB for 2 nights; 0300-0700), and rapid (0-hr TIB for 1 night) sleep loss. On each day, participants completed a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), a probed-recall memory task, a psychomotor vigilance task, a divided attention task, and the Profile of Mood States. "Rapid" sleep loss produced significantly more impairment on tests of alertness, memory, and performance compared to the "slow" accumulation of a comparable amount of sleep loss. The impairing effects of sleep loss vary as a function of rate, suggesting the presence of a compensatory adaptive mechanism operating in conjunction with the accumulation of a sleep debt.