Endoscopic iliopsoas lengthening for treatment of recalcitrant iliopsoas tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty.

Iliopsoas (IP) tendinitis from impingement upon the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been treated with open and endoscopic IP tenotomy or acetabular component revision. This study describes the results of a consecutive series of patients treated with endoscopic IP tenotomy as a less invasive alternative. Twenty-eight patients with IP impingement after THA underwent endoscopic IP lengthening from 2012 to 2021 at a single-center academic institution. The follow-up of 24 of these patients was achieved with a mean follow-up of 7.6 months (range 1-28). Outcomes included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog pain scale (VAS), satisfaction, component positioning and complications. Seventy-one percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied after their operation. The median mHHS preoperatively was 57 (Interquartile range [IQR] 43-60) and postoperatively was 75 (IQR 66-92, P < 0.001). Clinically meaningful improvements in mHHS were seen in patients with VAS pain scores <5, cup prominence >8 mm, body mass index >30, and less than 2 years from their index THA. Two patients developed a deep infection 7 and 10 months postoperatively (neither related to the release), and one patient underwent open psoas release for persistent impingement. Endoscopic IP tenotomy is a safe and effective treatment for impingement after THA. Patients with cup prominence >8 mm, body mass index >30 and less than 2 years since their index THA may have more clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function.

Supine Knee Positioning Does Not Interfere with Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performance.

The Food and Drug Administration has only approved mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) to be performed with a hanging leg holder. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a supine knee position on MB-UKA performance.In total, 16 cadavers were randomized so that either the right or left knee was placed in the flexed or supine positions. One board-certified orthopaedic surgeon and three adult reconstruction fellows that attended the required Oxford partial knee instructional course performed four operations in each position. The primary outcome was final knee balance. Secondary outcomes included procedure duration, timing of individual surgical steps, implant sizes, range of motion, implant alignment, and fracture. A Students t-test was used to examine differences between positions with significance set at p < 0.05. Secondary analyses using two one-sided tests were conducted to explore equivalence between the two positions.There was no significant difference in mean final balance between supine (1.7 mm ± standard deviation [SD] = 1.5 mm) and flexed (1.3 ± 1.3 mm) positions (p = 0.390). There were also no significant differences between positions for procedure time (p = 0.497), tibia coronal alignment (p = 0.614), tibial slope (p = 0.194), femoral component sagittal alignment (p = 0.091), and fractures (n = 0). Exploratory equivalence analyses indicated that the positions were equivalent for final balance (p = 0.002).MB-UKA performed in the supine position is not significantly different from the flexed position in terms of ligament balance, overall procedure time, and radiographic appearance. These initial safety data warrant further clinical investigations and support the expansion of the surgical technique to include performing MB-UKAs in the supine position.

Pes Planovalgus Is Associated with Increased Comorbidities and Poor Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Pes planovalgus affects knee biomechanics but there are no studies describing its impact on total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aim to characterize the demographics, medical, and surgical complications of patients with pes planovalgus undergoing TKA. A Medicare database was queried using ICD-9 codes to identify 5,750 patients with and 23,000 patients without pes planovalgus who underwent TKA from 2005 to 2014. Standard descriptive statistics were used to compare medical and surgical complications at 90 days and 2 years, with alpha < 0.003 after a Bonferroni Correction. Patients with pes planovalgus had an elevated incidence of hypertension (80%, p < 0.001), pulmonary disease (31%, p < 0.001), hypothyroidism (28%, p < 0.001), diabetes (30%, p < 0.001), vascular disease (20%, p < 0.001), obesity (26%, p < 0.001), and depression (23%, p < 0.001). They also had increased odds of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, p < 0.001), stiffness (OR 1.3, p < 0.003) and revision (OR 1.59, p < 0.003) at 90 days. At 2 years, odds of stiffness had increased (OR 1.34, p < 0.001) with similar rates of revision and medical complications. Pes planovaglus is associated with increased medical comorbidities and this patient population may be at an increased risk for postoperative stiffness, early revisions, and DVT after TKA. Arthroplasty surgeons should be conscious of these risks when considering TKA in a patient with pes planovalgus and counsel them appropriately. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):202-206, 2023).

Economic Impact of Revision Operations for Adjacent Segment Disease of the Subaxial Cervical Spine.

INTRODUCTION: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) of the cervical spine is a common disabling phenomenon that often requires surgical intervention. The goal of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of revision operations for cervical ASD. METHODS: Consecutive adults who underwent revision cervical spine surgery for ASD at a single institution between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Direct costs were identified from medical billing data and calculated for each revision surgery for ASD. Incomplete cost data for revision operations were used as a criterion for exclusion. Cost data were stratified based on the approach of the index and revision operations. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (average age 57 ± 10 years) underwent revisions for cervical ASD, which summed to $2 million (average $23,702). Revisions consisted of 45 anterior operations (anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, 34; corpectomy, 10; and cervical disk arthroplasty, 1), 32 posterior operations (posterior cervical fusion, 14; foraminotomy, 14; and laminoplasty, 4), and 8 circumferential operations. Circumferential revisions had notably higher average direct costs ($57,376) than single approaches (anterior, $20,084 and posterior, $20,371). Of posterior revisions, foraminotomies had the lowest average direct costs ($5,389), whereas posterior cervical fusion had the highest average direct costs ($35,950). Of anterior revisions, corpectomies ($30,265) had notably greater average direct costs than anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion ($17,514). Costs were not notably different for revision approaches based on the index operations' approach. DISCUSSION: Revision operations for cervical ASD are highly heterogeneous and associated with an average direct cost of $27,702. Over 3 years, revisions for 85 patients with cervical ASD represented a notable economic expense (greater than $2.0 million). DATA AVAILABILITY: Deidentified data may be provided by request to the corresponding author.

Notching of the Neck After Acetabular Constraint Necessitating Femoral Component Revision.

A 75-year-old woman who had previously undergone a left revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of a constrained acetabular liner presented with recurrent dislocation of the hip. Intraoperatively, there was metallic staining of the hip capsule and significant notching of the femoral neck, consistent with impingement of the intact locking ring, necessitating stem revision. Constrained acetabular liners have high failure rates due to intraprosthetic impingement, but to our knowledge, failure due to notching of the femoral component and metallosis from repeated impingement has not been described. Surgeons should be aware of this potential mode of failure.

Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Mobile-Bearing Implant.

BACKGROUND: For patients with isolated medial knee arthritis, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an appealing surgical option. Compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), UKA is less invasive, preserves more native bone stock, has lower perioperative morbidity and mortality1,2, allows for quicker recovery1,2, and has higher patient satisfaction2,3. It also allows for more dynamic proprioception and postural control, allowing for function more similar to a native knee4. Proper surgical technique and patient selection are critical to the growing success of UKA. DESCRIPTION: The general principles of UKA are to remove and replace the diseased femoral and tibial joint surfaces while restoring limb alignment. The key steps of this procedure are demonstrated in the video article: (1) patient evaluation, (2) patient positioning, (3) surgical exposure, (4) tibial guide placement and resection, (5) femoral guide placement and resection, (6) knee balancing and implant trialing, (7) preventing impingement, (8) final tibial preparation, (9) final component placement, and (10) closure and postoperative course. ALTERNATIVES: Patients should first exhaust all nonoperative treatments before considering UKA. For those patients who do not meet the appropriate indications for UKA, TKA is the most acceptable alternative treatment. In active patients <55 years old without bone-on-bone osteoarthritis, a high tibial osteotomy may be considered. When considering UKA, options include both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs. RATIONALE: The potential advantages of UKA over TKA make it an attractive option for the appropriate patient. Recently, indications for UKA have expanded to include (1) isolated noninflammatory bone-on-bone arthritis in the medial compartment; (2) retained full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment, best visualized on valgus-stress radiographs; (3) a functionally normal medial collateral ligament; and (4) a functionally normal anterior cruciate ligament5. Mobile-bearing UKA designs consist of a dual articulation between the concave polyethylene insert and the metallic tibial and spherical femoral components, which allows for distribution of contact forces over a large surface area6. In contrast, fixed-bearing designs have a flat polyethylene insert that does not conform to the femur. Current data do not demonstrate a clear difference in clinical performance between the 2 bearings. However, a recent systematic review has shown lower polyethylene wear rates in mobile-bearing implants7. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The survivorship of mobile-bearing UKA ranges from 85% to 98% at 10 years8-12 and from 79% to 94% at 15 years8,13,14. The most common indications for revision include aseptic loosening (36%), progression of osteoarthritis (20%), and unexplained pain (11%)7. Bearing dislocation is a unique complication for mobile-bearing UKAs, with reported rates between 0.3% to 4.2%6,10,12. IMPORTANT TIPS: Always inspect all compartments of the knee for evidence of substantial degenerative changes prior to proceeding with UKA. If there is advanced arthritis in other compartments, the decision should be made to proceed with TKA instead. Therefore, preoperatively, all patients indicated for UKA should also sign a consent form for TKA, and TKA implants should be available in case they are needed.When assessing bearing size, it is important that there is no axial loading through the heel to properly assess the flexion gap. Intraoperatively, this can be done by elevating the thigh so that the foot hangs freely. The trial spoon should fit into the joint without substantial resistance or effort.Spigots do not reference the end of the bone. Rather, they reference the end of the spigot hole that was drilled using the initial 0 spigot.Spigot number represents the total thickness of additional bone that will be removed from the first mill cut.Confirm the amount of bone that was resected by inspecting the small rim of bone that remains around the spigot hole after milling.

Perioperative Statin Use May Reduce Postoperative Arrhythmia Rates After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative arrhythmias are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) decrease atrial fibrillation rates after cardiac surgery, but it is unknown if this cardioprotective effect is maintained after joint reconstruction surgery. We aim to determine if perioperative statin use decreases the incidence of 90-day postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing primary TJA. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study in which 231 primary TJA patients (109 hips, 122 knees) received simvastatin 80 mg daily during their hospitalization as part of a single surgeon's standard postoperative protocol. This cohort was matched to 966 primary TJA patients (387 hips and 579 knees) that did not receive simvastatin. New-onset arrhythmias (bradycardia, atrial fibrillation/tachycardia/flutter, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia) and complications (readmissions, thromboembolism, infection, and dislocation) within 90 days of the procedure were documented. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests. Our study was powered to detect a 3% difference in arrhythmia rates. RESULTS: Within 90 days postoperatively, arrhythmias occurred in 1 patient (0.4%) who received a perioperative statin, 39 patients (4.0%) who did not receive statins (P = .003), and 24 patients (4.2%) who were on outpatient statins (P = .005). This is 10-fold reduction in the relative risk of developing a postoperative arrhythmia within 90 days of arthroplasty and an absolute risk reduction of 3.6%. CONCLUSION: Treating as few as 28 patients with perioperative simvastatin prevents one new cardiac arrhythmia within 90 days in statin-naïve patients undergoing TJA.

Perioperative Medical and Surgical Coronavirus Disease 2019 Issues: Keeping Surgeons, Operating Room Teams, and Patients Safe.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected over 22 million people in the United States (US) and has had a devastating impact on the US economy and healthcare system. In order to help slow the spread of the virus and save hospital resources, nonessential businesses were forced to close and elective surgeries have been postponed. METHODS: As we reach the peak of the pandemic and the COVID-19 vaccine gets distributed, healthcare systems must develop plans to safely resume elective surgeries. This article outlines a single center academic medical center's perioperative COVID-19 protocol to help keep surgeons, operating room teams, and patients safe. RESULTS: While testing protocols can help minimize the transmission of the virus, there is still the potential for COVID+ patients to undergo surgery undetected, due to potential false negative tests and the long incubation period before seroconversion and symptom development. CONCLUSIONS: An effective institutional strategy not only includes clear perioperative testing protocols, but also education regarding clinical manifestations and exposure control.

Definitions of Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy: Are We Speaking the Same Language and Are We Measuring the Right Outcome?

BACKGROUND: Return to sport is a commonly studied outcome of hip arthroscopy that is relevant to both patients and providers. There exists substantial variability in criteria used to define successful return to sport. PURPOSE: To review and evaluate the definitions used in the literature so as to establish a single standard to enable comparison of outcomes in future studies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched from inception to June 1, 2019, for studies relating to hip arthroscopy and return to sport. Articles included were those that met the following criteria: (1) contained 2 or more patients, (2) studied patients 18 years of age and older, (3) reported postoperative outcomes after hip arthroscopy, (4) clearly defined return to play, and (5) were written in English. Excluded articles (1) reported outcomes for nonoperative or open treatments, (2) did not clearly define return to play, or (3) were review articles, meta-analyses, or survey-based studies. Return-to-play definitions and additional metrics of postoperative performance and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 185 articles were identified, and 28 articles were included in the final review, of which 18 involved elite athletes and 10 involved recreational athletes. Of articles studying elite athletes, 6 (33%) defined return to play as participation in regular or postseason competition, 3 (17%) extended the criteria to the preseason, and 2 (11%) used participation in sport-related activities and training. The remaining 7 (39%) reported rates of return to the preoperative level of competition but did not specify preseason versus regular season. All 10 articles evaluating recreational athletes defined return to play based on patient-reported outcomes. Four (40%) did so qualitatively, while 6 (60%) did so quantitatively. CONCLUSION: There exists significant variability in criteria used to define successful return to sport after hip arthroscopy, and these criteria differ among elite and recreational athletes. For elite athletes, return to the preoperative level of competition is most commonly used, but there exists no consensus on what type of competition-regular season, preseason, or training-is most appropriate. For recreational athletes, patient-reported data are most commonly employed, although there are clear differences between authors on the ways in which these are being used as well.

The Effect of Resection Size in the Treatment of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement in the Typical Patient With Hip Arthroscopy: A Biomechanical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic osteochondroplasty may improve range of motion and relieve pain in patients with symptomatic hip impingement. Femoral neck fracture is a risk of this procedure because of the weakening of the proximal femur. To our knowledge, there are no biomechanical studies in young human cadaveric bone evaluating the effect of osteochondroplasty on femoral neck strength. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to evaluate loads to fracture in young human cadavers after resection depths of 25% and 40% at the head-neck junction. We hypothesized that both depths will maintain ultimate loads to failure above previously published loads, as well as above physiologic weightbearing loads. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (6 matched pairs, under the age of 47 years) were divided into 2 groups: 25% or 40% of the diameter at the head-neck junction was resected. The length of the resection was 2 cm and the width of the resection was determined by the length of the anterolateral quadrant at the head-neck junction in all cases. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared between groups. RESULTS: The average peak load to fracture after 25% resection (7347 N) was significantly higher than after the 40% resection (5892 N) (P = .010). The average energy to fracture was also significantly higher in the 25% resection group (30.2 J vs 19.2 J; P = .007). The average stiffness was higher in the 25% group, although not statistically significant (P = .737). CONCLUSION: Resection depths of 25% and 40% at the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction may be safe at previously described functional loads such as standing and walking in the age range more typically seen in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Loads to fracture were significantly higher than previously reported using older cadaveric specimens. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Currently, most surgeons limit weightbearing after femoral osteochondroplasty in part because of risk of femoral neck fracture. Given the higher observed loads to fracture, young patients could possibly bear weight sooner after surgery, although postoperative protocols should be individualized based on patient age, weight, bone density, amount of bone resected, concomitant procedures, and potential compliance with activity restrictions.

Selective screw fixation is associated with early failure of primary acetabular components for aseptic loosening.

Selective supplementation of acetabular component fixation with a screw during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) assumes that the surgeon can detect when an acetabular component needs additional stability. In contrast, nonselective screw users do not alter their practice based on their interpretation of stability and either use screws all or none of the time. We aimed to determine the effect of selective screw use on aseptic acetabular component loosening. We retrospectively reviewed aseptic failures of acetabular components after primaty THA. We compared the survivorship of selective and nonselective supplementation of acetabular fixation with respect to time to revision, obesity, and screw use. Selective screw use (n = 16) was associated with earlier acetabular component aseptic loosening (median: 1.9 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.1-5.0) compared to nonselective screw use (n = 22; median: 5.6 years; IQR: 2.0-15.3; P = .010). Selective screw use was independently associated with earlier revision after adjusting for patient obesity. Obesity was associated with selective screw use in 50% of the cases vs 14% of nonselective cases (odds ratio: 6.3; confidence interval: 1.2-25.2; P = .028), possibly reflecting the increased difficulty in achieving acetabular component stability in this and other settings with compromised bone. Surgeons should carefully assess component stability at time of primary THA. If the acetabulum is not stable, the addition of screws alone may not be sufficient for acetabular component stability.