The use of trough ribavirin concentration to predict sustained virological response and haematological toxicity in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients treated with ribavirin and pegylated interferon.

OBJECTIVES: To study the association between trough ribavirin concentration (C(trough)) with sustained virological response (SVR) and haemoglobin (Hb) decrease in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-co-infected (HIV+/HCV+) patients treated with anti-HCV therapy. METHODS: HIV+/HCV+ patients treated with ribavirin and pegylated interferon were prospectively evaluated. Qualitative and quantitative HCV-RNA, Hb levels and ribavirin C(trough) were measured at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 during therapy. HCV-RNA was also measured at 24 weeks after the end of therapy. Efficacy analysis was performed on patients with a definitive virological outcome (SVR, relapser and non-responder), whereas for toxicity analysis, dropouts were considered until the last available observation. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (54.7% with genotype 1 or 4) were included. Overall, no correlation between ribavirin C(trough) and early virological response (EVR) nor SVR was found. However, in patients with genotype 1 or 4, ribavirin C(trough) was independently associated with EVR (P = 0.036) and SVR (P = 0.046). A ribavirin C(trough) cut-off of 1600 ng/mL was found to be associated with both EVR (chi(2) = 5.69, P = 0.028) and SVR (chi(2)=4.2, P = 0.04). Higher ribavirin C(trough) correlated with Hb decrease (R = -0.361, P = 0.009) and was independently associated with an Hb decrease of >4 g/dL (P = 0.009). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that a ribavirin C(trough) of >2300 ng/mL was associated with an Hb decrease of >4 g/dL (chi(2) = 8.08, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed a relationship between ribavirin exposure and both efficacy and toxicity. Moreover, we found ribavirin C(trough) cut-offs for both SVR in genotypes 1 and 4 and overall haematological toxicity. These findings deserve further clinical evaluation.

Imipenem/cilastatin as empirical treatment of severe infections in compromised patients.

Imipenem/cilastatin was administered as empirical treatment to 22 patients with severe infections, at dosages of 2 or 4 g/day, either alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside. The majority of patients had underlying diseases causing various degrees of immune system dysfunction. The overall cure rate was 77.2%, without significant differences according to the type of pathogen or dosage schedule; however one of the two observed failures was due to a resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Strains recovered from improved patients were all sensitive to the drug. Only mild adverse effects were evidenced, without any alteration of laboratory parameters. Imipenem/cilastatin may be useful as monotherapy in empirical treatment of severe infections in compromised patients.