A review of post-operative feeding in patients undergoing resection and reconstruction for oral malignancy and presentation of a pre-operative scoring system.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric tubes (NGT) are routine after resection and reconstruction of oral cancer. The selection of the most appropriate method of feeding can be challenging, as both methods carry morbidity. This makes correct selection paramount. The objectives of this retrospective review were to identify the benefits and complications of feeding with PEG and NGT in patients with oral malignancy. We retrospectively reviewed 144 patients who had undergone oral cancer resection and reconstruction, to compare PEG and NGT feeding and to identify the key factors that aid selection of the most appropriate feeding method. We used these factors to develop the Key to Appropriate Replacement Enteral Nutrition (KAREN) scoring system. One hundred and twenty of the 144 patients were managed with PEG, and of these, 9 used it for less than 28 days. The mean (range) duration of use was 13 (5-63) days, and 1.9 (1-5) tubes/patient were used. The KAREN scoring system assigned the correct method of feeding in 92% of cases. The scoring system requires prospective validation but could provide clinicians with a tool to assist in a sometimes difficult decision.

Malakoplakia presenting as an enlarging neck mass: Case presentation and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Malakoplakia is a very rare chronic inflammatory disorder, first described in 1902. In 75% of cases, the condition affects the genitourinary tract. Five cases of malakoplakia affecting the neck were previously reported in the literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: An 83-year-old woman presented with an enlarging mass in the posterior triangle of the neck that was histologically confirmed as malakoplakia. Presenting features are often nonspecific, and the diagnosis is dependent on histological findings. The characteristic microscopic findings are of Michaelis-Gutmann (M-G) bodies that stain positive with periodic acid-Schiff reagent, von Kossa's reaction for calcium, and Perl's ferrocyanide reaction to ferric iron. CONCLUSION: Although rare, a diagnosis of malakoplakia should be considered in patients with an enlarging mass. This may mimic the presentation of malignancy, particularly in patients in whom erosion through skin occurs, and histological confirmation is advocated.