ChatGPT in Medical Education and Research: A Boon or a Bane?

Science fiction literature and films no longer focus on artificial intelligence. In contrast to all other aspects of life, medical education and clinical patient care have been progressing slowly. Recently, a lot of text from the internet was used to construct and train chatbots, especially ChatGPT. The language model ChatGPT, created by OpenAI, has emerged as a useful resource for medical research and education. It has proven to be a useful tool for researchers, students, and medical professionals because of its capacity to produce human-like answers to challenging medical queries. However, using ChatGPT also has significant drawbacks. The possibility of erroneous or biased information being spread, which could have negative effects on patient care, is one of the key worries. Moreover, the overreliance on technology in medical education could also lead to a decline in critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills. Overall, ChatGPT has the potential to be a boon to medical education and research, but its use must be accompanied by caution and critical evaluation.

Multifaceted Role of Social Media in Healthcare: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Need for Quality Control.

Social media, leveraging Web 2.0 technologies, plays a vital role in healthcare, medical education, and research by fostering collaboration and enabling research dissemination. Healthcare professionals use these platforms to improve public health literacy, but concerns about misinformation and content accuracy persist. In 2023, platforms like Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, California, United States), YouTube (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States), Instagram (Meta Platforms, Inc.), TikTok (ByteDance Ltd, Beijing, China), and Twitter (X Corp., Carson City, Nevada, United States) have become essential in healthcare, offering patient communication, professional development, and knowledge-sharing opportunities. However, challenges such as breaches of patient confidentiality and unprofessional conduct remain. Social media has transformed medical education, providing unique networking and professional development opportunities. Further studies are needed to determine its educational value. Healthcare professionals must follow ethical and professional guidelines, particularly regarding patient privacy, confidentiality, disclosure rules, and copyright laws. Social media significantly impacts patient education and healthcare research. Platforms like WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.) effectively improve patient compliance and outcomes. Yet, the rapid dissemination of false news and misinformation on social media platforms presents risks. Researchers must consider potential biases and content quality when extracting data. Quality control and regulation are crucial in addressing potential dangers and misinformation in social media and healthcare. Stricter regulations and monitoring are needed due to cases of deaths resulting from social media trends and false news spread. Ethical frameworks, informed consent practices, risk assessments, and appropriate data management strategies are essential for responsible research using social media technologies. Healthcare professionals and researchers must judiciously use social media, considering its risks to maximize benefits and mitigate potential drawbacks. By striking the right balance, healthcare professionals can enhance patient outcomes, medical education, research, and the overall healthcare experience.

Demographics, Pattern of Care & Outcomes of Primary CNS Lymphoma- Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center in India.

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with the worst outcomes amongst all extranodal lymphomas. There is a scarcity of data on real-world outcomes of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) owing to the rarity of the disease. This study analyzed the demographic patterns, risk stratification, treatment regimens used, & outcomes of patients treated at Tata Memorial Center Mumbai, India. This is a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma patients treated at our centre over seven years from January 2013 to December 2019. A total of 142 patients with PCNSL were diagnosed during this period. Thirty (21.1%) patients were deemed ineligible for any systemic or local therapies,ten patients were referred to other hospitals, two patients had relapsed disease, and one was excluded because age less than 18 years. Finally 99 patients were included in the final analysis. Among these 99 patients,72 patients (72.7%) were < 60 years,70 (70.7%) patients had Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) less than equal to 2. DLBCL was the most common histology (86.4%) while rests were high grade B cell NHL NOS (11.4%),Burkitt's Lymphoma(1%),Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma NOS (1.2%). Only one of 99 patients was positive for HIV serology. Multiple intracranial lesions were found in 59.5%. Surgical resection was performed in 28.4% of patients. Out of 63 patients in whom the International extranodal lymphoma study group (IELSG) score is available, 34(54%) were IELSG high-risk groups. As per Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk grouping, patients were almost equally distributed in all the risk groups, with 32(32.3%) patients in risk group 1 (age < 50 years), 36(36.4%) patients in risk group 2 (age > 50 years, KPS > = 70), and 31(31.3%) patients in risk group 3 age > 50 years, KPS < 70). First-line treatment with high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based regimens was administered to 92 (92.9%) patients, and 72.8% of these patients received rituximab. Of these 92 patients, 59 (64.1%) patients could complete induction, and 52 patients received consolidation. Thirty-one patients received high dose cytarabine based chemo consolidation, one patient underwent high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ACST), and 19 patients received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 1 patient received temozolomide as consolidation regimen. Thus only 52 patients completed the entire course of induction with consolidation therapy. The response to treatment was assessed using International PCNSL Collaborative Group Criteria. Post completion of consolidation, 49(94.2%) patients had a complete response. With a median follow-up duration of 39.2 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and the median overall survival (OS) of the patients taken into the analysis (N = 99) were 21 and 37 months respectively. On multivariate analysis, age < 60 yrs, > = 5 HD-MTX cycles received & the use of rituximab predicted better OS.Outcomes of patients with PCNSL treated with HD-MTX based therapy are comparable to reported literature however a large proportion of patients do not undergo required treatment despite the curable nature of disease. Supplementary Information: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01557-7.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: experience from Tata Memorial Centre.

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) constitutes a heterogeneous group of poorly differentiated non-small cell lung cancers. Since these are rare tumours, we sought to determine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of these patients treated at our centre. Methods: We did a retrospective evaluation of all patients diagnosed with PSC between January 2013 and September 2020 at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Baseline demographic and treatment data and outcomes were obtained retrospectively from electronic medical records and survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Out of 151 patients diagnosed with PSC during this period, 129 were included in the final analysis. The clinical stage was stage I in 3 (2.03%), stage II in 4 (3.1%), stage III in 35 (27.1%) and stage IV in 87 (67.4%). The median follow-up duration was 32 months (range, 15.0-48.9). The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received curative surgery was 18 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.59-33.4); concurrent chemoradiation was 11 months (95% CI, 2.99-19); palliative chemotherapy was 8 months (95% CI, 5.24-10.75) and best supportive care was 1 month (95% CI, 0.43-1.57, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the presence of brain metastasis (p = 0.018; hazard ratio (HR), 2.47; 95% CI, 1.34-4.49) and the administration of chemotherapy (p = 0.037; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.04-4.94) were the only factors impacting the OS. Conclusion: PSC usually presents in advanced stages and is associated with a poor prognosis.

Impact of Molecular Tumor Board on the Clinical Management of Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) help in interpreting complex genomic data generated by molecular tumor profiling and improve patients' access to targeted therapies. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of our institution's MTB on the clinical management of patients with cancer. METHODS: This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center in India. Cases to be discussed in the MTB were identified by molecular pathologists, scientists, or oncologists. On the basis of the clinical data and molecular test reports, a course of clinical management was recommended and made available to the treating oncologist. We determined the proportion of patients who were recommended a change in the clinical management. We also assessed compliance of the treating oncologists with MTB recommendations. RESULTS: There were 339 discussions for 328 unique patients. The median age of the cohort was 54 years (range 17-87), and the majority of the patients were men (65.1%). Of 339 cases, 133 (39.2%) were recommended continuation of ongoing therapy while the remaining 206 (60.7%) were recommended a change in clinical management. Compliance with MTB recommendations for a change in clinical management was 58.5% (79 of 138 evaluable cases). Compliance and implementation for MTB's recommendation to start a new therapy in 104 evaluable cases were 60.5% and 44.2%, respectively. A total of 248 biopsies had at least one actionable mutation. A total of 646 mutations were identified in the cohort, with EGFR being the most frequently altered gene. CONCLUSION: MTBs help in interpreting results of molecular tests, understanding the significance of molecular abnormalities, and assessing the benefits of available targeted therapies and clinical trials in the management of patients with targetable genetic alterations.

Real-World Outcomes With Generic Pomalidomide in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma-Experience From a Tertiary Care Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) that is refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide is very poor wherein the median survival is between 3 and 9 months. We did this retrospective analysis to study the pattern of utilization, tolerance, and outcomes with pomalidomide in these patients having RRMM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all the patients who were treated with generic pomalidomide at Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, during the period of May 2017 to March 2019 was done. Patients with secretory disease and who had completed at least one cycle of pomalidomide were analyzed for response rates, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients received pomalidomide-based therapy during this study period, out of which 75 were included in the survival analysis. Forty-eight patients (59.3%) were refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Overall response rate was 58.7%. Five patients (6.7%) achieved complete response, very good partial response was seen in 13 patients (17.3%), and partial response was seen in 26 patients (34.7%). After a median follow-up of 11 months (range 2-27 months), median progression-free survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 12.9 months). Median progression-free survival for patients who were refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib versus nonrefractory was 5.5 and 12.6 months, respectively, which was significant statistically (P = .04, hazard ratio, 0.35, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.97). The median overall survival was not reached. Important toxicities included anemia (28%), neutropenia (16%), pneumonia (16%), and venous thrombosis (5%). CONCLUSION: Generic pomalidomide-based therapy is an effective option and is well tolerated in patients with RRMM. Higher response rates and longer survival seen in our study are possibly because of heterogeneity of the study population.