Acceptance or rejection of vaccination against influenza and SARS-CoV2 viruses among primary care professionals in Central Catalonia. A cross-sectional study.

Background: With the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the uncertainty about the real impact of coinfection with other viruses, and the increased risk of mortality in the case of coinfection with the influenza virus, health authorities recommended an increase in influenza vaccination coverage among at-risk groups to minimize the possible impact on individuals and the healthcare system. Recommendations for influenza vaccination during the 2020-2021 campaign in Catalonia were focused on increasing vaccination coverage, especially for social and healthcare workers, elderly people and at-risk individuals of any age. The objectives for the 2020-2021 season in Catalonia were to reach 75 % for the elderly and for social and healthcare workers, and 60 % for pregnant women and at-risk groups. In the case of healthcare professionals and those over 65 years of age, the target was not met. Vaccination coverage reached 65.58 % and 66.44 %, respectively (in the 2019-2020 campaign it was 39.08 %).Analysing and following up on the background and context in which health professionals accept influenza vaccination will help develop strategies for long-term influenza vaccination campaigns. The present study looks at healthcare professionals in a specific territory where the reasons for acceptance or refusal of the influenza vaccine during the 2021-2022 vaccination campaign, as well as the reasons for acceptance or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine, were analysed by means of an online survey. Methods: Calculations suggested that a random sample of 290 individuals would be sufficient to estimate, with 95% confidence and a precision of +/- 5 percentage units, a population percentage that was expected to be around 30%. The required replacement rate was 10%.The R statistical software (version 3.6.3) was used for the statistical analysis. Confidence intervals were 95 % and contrasts with a p-value of < 0.05 were considered significant. Findings: Of the 1921 professionals to whom the survey was sent, 586 (30.5%) responded to all the questions. 95.2% of respondents were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 66.2% against influenza.It was observed that the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and the decision to get vaccinated was different for influenza and COVID-19. The reasons for accepting the COVID-19 vaccine with the highest percentage were firstly protecting family (82.2%), self-protection (74.9%) and also protecting patients (57.8%). Otherwise, other reasons not described in the survey (50%) and mistrust (42.3%) were the reasons for rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine.Regarding influenza, the most relevant reasons for which professionals got vaccinated were self-protection (70.7%), protecting family (69.7%) and protecting patients (58.4%). Reasons for refusing the influenza vaccine were reasons not mentioned in the survey (29.1%) and the low probability of suffering complications (27.4%). Interpretation: Analysing the context, territory, sector, and the reasons for both accepting and refusing a vaccine will help develop effective strategies. Although vaccination coverage against COVID-19 was very high throughout Spain, a marked increase in influenza vaccination in the context of COVID-19 was observed among healthcare professionals in the Central Catalonia region compared to the previous pre-pandemic campaign.

Effectiveness of a brief intervention for acceptance of influenza vaccine in reluctant primary care patients / Efectividad del consejo breve para la vacunación antigripal en pacientes reacios en atención primaria

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a brief intervention in increasing influenza vaccination coverage compared with the usual advice in people who refuse it, and to record the main reasons for refusing to be vaccinated. Method: A cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted in which the study population was individuals with high risk factors who initially had refused to be vaccinated against influenza. Professionals (doctors and nurses) who voluntarily accepted to participate were assigned randomly to the intervention group (brief intervention) and the control group (usual advice). Results: 57 professionals recruited 524 people who had previously declined the influenza vaccination (271 in the control group and 253 in the intervention group). Brief intervention showed its effectiveness with an odds ratio of 2.48 (1.61-3.82; p < 0.001), in individuals aged 60 or over, both healthy or with risk factors. The most frequent reasons for rejection of vaccination were the belief that there was no risk of getting sick (53.0%) and the fear of the side effects (33.3%). (AU)

Objetivo: Determinar la efectividad del consejo breve para la vacunación antigripal frente al consejo habitual en personas que la rechazan, y conocer los principales motivos de rechazo. Método: Se realizó un ensayo clínico aleatorizado por clusters, en el que la población de estudio eran personas con factores de riesgo y que inicialmente rechazaban vacunarse. Los/las profesionales (médicos/as y enfermeros/as) que aceptaron participar se distribuyeron aleatoriamente en un grupo de intervención (consejo breve) y un grupo de control (consejo habitual). Resultados: Cincuenta y siete profesionales reclutaron 524 personas que rechazaron la vacunación (271 en el grupo control y 253 en el grupo de intervención). El consejo breve demostró su efectividad, con una odds ratio de 2,48 (1,61-3,82; p < 0.001), en las personas de 60 años o más, sanos o con factores de riesgo. Los principales motivos para no vacunarse fueron la creencia de no estar en riesgo de enfermar (53,0%) y el miedo a los efectos secundarios (33,3%). Conclusiones: El consejo breve es una herramienta efectiva para mejorar las coberturas de vacunación en personas que la rechazan inicialmente. (AU)

Influenza vaccination in coronavirus times: Primary Care professionals' intention to get vaccinated in Central Catalonia (VAGCOVID). A cross sectional study.

Influenza vaccination is the main measure of prevention against epidemic flu. Although recommended, vaccination coverage remains low. The lack of knowledge about the evolution of influenza in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic led to the recommendation of influenza vaccination to people at risk and professionals to avoid a greater burden than the one already posed by SARS-CoV-2. The aim of the study is to determine health professionals' intention to vaccinate against seasonal flu in the 2020-2021 campaign, in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and to analyse the factors that influence it. Cross-sectional study through a structured survey aimed at Primary Care professionals in Central Catalonia. A total of 610 participants responded to the survey, 65.7% of whom intended to get vaccinated against influenza in this campaign, and 11.1% did not know or did not answer. The intention to get vaccinated is associated with the professional category and the number of years of professional practice. The profile of the professionals who intend to get vaccinated against flu includes professionals with a history of vaccination, who participate in on-call duties and perceive that their dependents were at risk of becoming ill. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, although almost two-thirds of the respondents showed a clear intention to get vaccinated against influenza, 11% were doubtful. To improve influenza vaccination uptake among health professionals, strategies need to be devised to target those professionals who are hesitant or reluctant to vaccinate.

Effectiveness of a brief intervention for acceptance of influenza vaccine in reluctant primary care patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a brief intervention in increasing influenza vaccination coverage compared with the usual advice in people who refuse it, and to record the main reasons for refusing to be vaccinated. METHOD: A cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted in which the study population was individuals with high risk factors who initially had refused to be vaccinated against influenza. Professionals (doctors and nurses) who voluntarily accepted to participate were assigned randomly to the intervention group (brief intervention) and the control group (usual advice). RESULTS: 57 professionals recruited 524 people who had previously declined the influenza vaccination (271 in the control group and 253 in the intervention group). Brief intervention showed its effectiveness with an odds ratio of 2.48 (1.61-3.82; p<0.001), in individuals aged 60 or over, both healthy or with risk factors. The most frequent reasons for rejection of vaccination were the belief that there was no risk of getting sick (53.0%) and the fear of the side effects (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Brief intervention is an effective tool in improving vaccination coverage in people who have initially rejected it.

Implantación de una prueba rápida de infección estreptocócica: ¿su uso también mejora la adherencia antibiótica? / Introduction of rapid streptococcal antigen test: can its use improve adherence to antibiotic therapy?

Objetivo: Evaluar la influencia del resultado de la prueba rápida de diagnóstico para la identificación del antígeno estreptocócico en infecciones faringoamigdalares pediátricas, en términos de mejora de la adherencia a la terapia antibiótica. Diseño: Ensayo clínico comunitario de dos grupos de estudio con asignación aleatoria. Emplazamiento: Centros de atención primaria de Cataluña Central. Participantes: En el estudio se incluyeron a pacientes de tres a 15 años por muestreo consecutivo, que fueron atendidos por sospecha de infección faringoamigdalar en las consultas pediátricas entre noviembre del 2010 y febrero del 2011. De 557 pacientes que satisficieron los criterios de inclusión, se hizo seguimiento a 519. Intervención: El grupo control siguió el algoritmo diagnóstico y terapéutico habitual. Al grupo de intervención, se le realizó adicionalmente la prueba diagnóstica rápida de detección del antígeno estreptocócico y se indicó tratamiento según el resultado. Mediciones principales: Evaluación de la adherencia, los motivos de no adherencia y los factores de riesgo sociodemográficos mediante una encuesta telefónica. Resultados: Se prescribió antibiótico al 65,6% y los pediatras del grupo control fueron más propensos a recetar antibióticos que los del grupo intervención (88,5 vs. 45,5%, p< 0,001). El 64,8% de los pacientes siguió las indicaciones del tratamiento, siendo la causa principal de no adherencia no cumplir el horario (25,6%). La adherencia terapéutica fue superior en el grupo de intervención (68%) que en el de control (62,9%), no existiendo una diferencia significativa. Conclusiones: La prueba rápida del diagnóstico para la identificación de estreptococo, complementaria al uso de los criterios Centor evita la prescripción innecesaria de tratamiento antibiótico, aunque no ha demostrado mejorar la adherencia terapéutica.(AU)

Objective: To evaluate the influence of the result of a rapid streptococcal antigen test in paediatric pharyngotonsillitis infections, in terms of improvement of antibiotic therapy adherence. Design: Randomized community clinical trial with two study groups. Location: Primary Care Centers in Central Catalonia. Participants: Patients aged from 3 to 15 years, who were attended at paediatric consultations on suspicion of pharyngotonsillitis caused by an infection between November 2010 and February 2011 (both included), were included in the study on a consecutive basis. 557 patients met the inclusion criteria and 519 were evaluated. Intervention: The control group received the usual diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm. Rapid streptococcal antigen test was additionally performed to experimental group participants and it was indicated the more convenient treatment. Main measurements: Antibiotic adherence, non-adherence causes and socio-demographic risk factors were evaluated via telephone survey. Results: Antibiotics were prescribed to 65.6% and paediatricians of the control group were more likely to prescribe antibiotic than the ones in the intervention group (88.5% vs 45.5%, p< 0.0001). 64.8% followed doctor's treatment orders, being failure following medication scheduling the main cause of non-adherence (25.6%). Medication adherence was higher in the experimental group (68%) than in the control group (62.9%) but no significant differences were found. Conclusion: Rapid strep test, complementing the use of Centor Criteria avoids unnecessary antibiotics prescriptions, but had not been proven to be effective in increasing medication adherence.(AU)

[Introduction of rapid streptococcal antigen test: can its use improve adherence to antibiotic therapy?] / Implantación de una prueba rápida de infección estreptocócica: ¿su uso también mejora la adherencia antibiótica?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the result of a rapid streptococcal antigen test in paediatric pharyngotonsillitis infections, in terms of improvement of antibiotic therapy adherence. DESIGN: Randomized community clinical trial with two study groups. LOCATION: Primary Care Centers in Central Catalonia. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged from 3 to 15 years, who were attended at paediatric consultations on suspicion of pharyngotonsillitis caused by an infection between November 2010 and February 2011 (both included), were included in the study on a consecutive basis. 557 patients met the inclusion criteria and 519 were evaluated. INTERVENTION: The control group received the usual diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm. Rapid streptococcal antigen test was additionally performed to experimental group participants and it was indicated the more convenient treatment. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Antibiotic adherence, non-adherence causes and socio-demographic risk factors were evaluated via telephone survey. RESULTS: Antibiotics were prescribed to 65.6% and paediatricians of the control group were more likely to prescribe antibiotic than the ones in the intervention group (88.5% vs 45.5%, p< 0.0001). 64.8% followed doctor's treatment orders, being failure following medication scheduling the main cause of non-adherence (25.6%). Medication adherence was higher in the experimental group (68%) than in the control group (62.9%) but no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: Rapid strep test, complementing the use of Centor Criteria avoids unnecessary antibiotics prescriptions, but had not been proven to be effective in increasing medication adherence.

Influenza vaccination during the coronavirus pandemic: intention to vaccinate among the at-risk population in the Central Catalonia Health Region (VAGCOVID).

BACKGROUND: Influenza is a major public health issue, with the primary preventive measure being an annual influenza vaccination. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage among the at-risk population is low. Our understanding of the behaviour of the influenza virus during the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic is limited, meaning influenza vaccination is still recommended for individuals at risk for severe complications due to influenza infection. The aim of the study is to determine the intention to vaccinate against seasonal influenza among the at-risk population in the 2020-21 campaign during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and to analyse the factors which influence such intention. METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone survey of adults (aged over 18) with risk factors in central Catalonia where the need for the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (SIV) was recommended. RESULTS: A total of 434 participants responded to the survey, 43.3% of whom intended to be vaccinated against influenza for the 2020-2021 influenza season, 40.8% had no intention to be vaccinated and 15.9% were uncertain or did not express their opinion. The intention to get vaccinated against influenza is associated with having dependents, the individual's perception of the risk of being infected with influenza and the perceived risk of transmission to dependents. It is also associated with age, whether the individual had received influenza vaccine the previous season or any other season before. The best predictors of the intention to vaccinate are the individual's perception of the risk of catching influenza and whether the individual had been vaccinated in the previous season. CONCLUSIONS: Intention to vaccinate can be a good predictor of individual behaviour in relation to vaccination. During the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic many individuals are hesitant to influenza vaccination. In order to improve influenza vaccination coverage in people included in risk groups, it is necessary to promote educational actions, especially among those who express doubts.

[State of internal communication in primary care]. / Comunicación interna en atención primaria.

OBJECTIVES: To study internal communication between primary care health professionals DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING: Catalan Health Institute Costa de Ponent Primary Care Area, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: All workers in the area (n=3565). MEASUREMENTS: Three part questionnaire: a) sociodemographic questions; b) questions scoring from 0 to 10 the current importance and operation of certain aspects; and c) questions on new communication tools. RESULTS: Of those sent a questionnaire, 39% (n=1388) responded, with a mean age of 43.2 years (95% CI, 42.75- 43.65), 28.9% being male. The major differences between importance and current events were said to be "to be informed of projects before they appear in the communication media," "by official routes and not by rumour," and "to be aware of projects of other teams." The least communicated within teams. The doctors considered upward communication to be more important. Doctors are those who appreciate communication within teams better and the professionals of the users services unit (UAU) less so. Doctors are the ones who give more importance to being informed of projects at the time. 55% do not use the intranet, mainly due to lack of time. The second reason is that they find it difficult. Sixty-two per cent read e-mail >2-3 times per week. Eighty-nine per cent want an electronic bulletin. The older workers use new technologies less. CONCLUSIONS: Downward, upward, and sideways communication needs to be improved, particularly upwards by doctors, and that of the teams for the UAU professionals. Intranet tools must be provided that make the work easier and training in handling new technologies must be offered.

Comunicación interna en atención primaria / State of internal communication in primary care

Objetivos. Estudiar la comunicación interna entre los profesionales de la atención primaria. Diseño. Estudio descriptivo, transversal. Emplazamiento. Ámbito de Atención Primaria Costa de Ponent del Institut Català de la Salut. Participantes. Todos los trabajadores del ámbito (n = 3.565). Mediciones. Encuesta dividida en 3 partes: a) preguntas sociodemográficas; b) preguntas que valoraban del 0 al 10 la importancia y el funcionamiento actual de diferentes cuestiones, y c) preguntas sobre nuevas herramientas de comunicación. Resultados. Respondieron un 39% de los encuestados (n = 1.388), con una edad media de 43,2 años (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 42,75-43,65), y el 28,9% eran varones. Las mayores diferencias entre importancia y actualidad se dieron a «enterarse de los proyectos antes de que se publiquen en los medios de comunicación», «conocerlos por vía oficial y no por rumores» y «conocer los proyectos de otros equipos». Las menores diferencias se produjeron en la comunicación dentro de los equipos. Los médicos consideran más importante la comunicación ascendente. Los médicos son los que valoran mejor la comunicación dentro de los equipos, y los profesionales de la unidad de atención al usuario (UAU), los que la valoran peor. Los médicos son los que más importancia dan a enterarse a tiempo de los proyectos. El 55% de los encuestados no utiliza el servicio de intranet, la mayor parte por falta de tiempo. El segundo motivo de esta falta de uso es su dificultad. Un 62% lee el correo electrónico más de 2-3 veces por semana El 89% de los encuestados querría tener un boletín electrónico. Los trabajadores de más edad usan menos las nuevas tecnologías. Conclusiones. Es necesario mejorar la comunicación descendente, ascendente y transversal, especialmente la ascendente de los médicos, y la de los equipos para los profesionales de la UAU. Debe dotarse a la intranet de instrumentos que agilicen el trabajo y ofrecerse formación en el manejo de las nuevas tecnologías

Objectives. To study internal communication between primary care health professionals Design. Cross-sectional, descriptive. Setting. Catalan Health Institute Costa de Ponent Primary Care Area, Spain. Participants. All workers in the area (n=3565). Measurements. Three part questionnaire: a) sociodemographic questions; b) questions scoring from 0 to 10 the current importance and operation of certain aspects; and c) questions on new communication tools. Results. Of those sent a questionnaire, 39% (n=1388) responded, with a mean age of 43.2 years (95% CI, 42.75- 43.65), 28.9% being male. The major differences between importance and current events were said to be "to be informed of projects before they appear in the communication media," "by official routes and not by rumour," and "to be aware of projects of other teams." The least communicated within teams. The doctors considered upward communication to be more important. Doctors are those who appreciate communication within teams better and the professionals of the users services unit (UAU) less so. Doctors are the ones who give more importance to being informed of projects at the time. 55% do not use the intranet, mainly due lack of time. The second reason is that they find it difficult. Sixty-two per cent read e-mail >2-3 times per week. Eighty-nine per cent want an electronic bulletin. The older workers use new technologies less. Conclusions. Downward, upward, and sideways communication needs to be improved, particularly upwards by doctors, and that of the teams for the UAU professionals. Intranet tools must be provided that make the work easier and training in handling new technologies must be offered

Interacciones farmacocinéticas entre metadona y antirretrovirales en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Pharmacokinetic interactions between methadone and antiretroviral medication in HIV positive patients

No disponible