Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Am J Mens Health ; 12(5): 1510-1516, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29717912

ABSTRACT

In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a Grade D recommendation for both testicular self-examination (TSE) and clinical evaluation to screen for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males. This review committee reaffirmed these recommendations in 2009 and again in 2011 (Testicular Cancer: Screening Release Date: April 2011. Final Update Summary: Testicular Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. September 2016). The 2011 USPSTF review found no significant evidence that would warrant a change from the last full review in 2004. We believe that the USPSTF erred in its assessments. As acknowledged in the task force report, testicular cancer is not believed to be preventable, and treatment of early detected testicular cancer is generally associated with very favorable outcomes; it is our belief therefore that every encouragement should be given to early detection. We are therefore requesting that the USPSTF review the D rating for testicular examination, both in a clinical setting and as self-examination. We are requesting this, as recent studies and public health warrant a change in grade. The new studies build on earlier studies that support the benefits of regular screening by individuals and their physicians. Further, and equally important, we believe that the current grade and attendant information confuses men and boys about the importance of self-care and wellness and continues to inadvertently reinforce negative cultural attitudes. We believe that adjusting the rating to a Grade B is both warranted and necessary.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnosis , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Self-Examination/standards , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Advisory Committees , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States , Young Adult
2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 28(2S): 69-80, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28458265

ABSTRACT

The Campus and Community HIV and Addiction Prevention (CCHAP) project was a collaborative effort between three academic institutions and a community-based organization to conduct rapid HIV testing, assess substance use behaviors, and provide education on HIV risk behaviors for African Americans, 18-24, attending historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and within the surrounding community. As a result of this partnership 2,385 participants received a rapid HIV test, with testing split almost equally between the campus and the community. The positivity rate was .6% (N = 15) with 10 newly diagnosed individuals accounting for 67% of the HIV positives. The results of the partnership provide evidence of a successful outreach program for both the campus and community, and identified a continued need for HIV testing and educational outreach for African American young adults 18-24.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcoholism/ethnology , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Child , Community-Institutional Relations , Counseling , Female , HIV Infections/ethnology , Health Risk Behaviors , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Sexuality , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/ethnology , Universities/organization & administration , Young Adult
3.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 104(7-8): 342-50, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23092049

ABSTRACT

Opioid abuse and addiction have increased in frequency in the United States over the past 20 years. In 2009, an estimated 5.3 million persons used opioid medications nonmedically within the past month, 200000 used heroin, and approximately 9.6% of African Americans used an illicit drug. Racial and ethnic minorities experience disparities in availability and access to mental health care, including substance use disorders. Primary care practitioners are often called upon to differentiate between appropriate, medically indicated opioid use in pain management vs inappropriate abuse or addiction. Racial and ethnic minority populations tend to favor primary care treatment settings over specialty mental health settings. Recent therapeutic advances allow patients requiring specialized treatment for opioid abuse and addiction to be managed in primary care settings. The Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 enables qualified physicians with readily available short-term training to treat opioid-dependent patients with buprenorphine in an office-based setting, potentially making primary care physicians active partners in the diagnosis and treatment of opioid use disorders. Methadone and buprenorphine are effective opioid replacement agents for maintenance and/or detoxification of opioid-addicted individuals. However, restrictive federal regulations and stigmatization of opioid addiction and treatment have limited the availability of methadone. The opioid partial agonist-antagonist buprenorphine/naloxone combination has proven an effective alternative. This article reviews the literature on differences between buprenorphine and methadone regarding availability, efficacy, safety, side-effects, and dosing, identifying resources for enhancing the effectiveness of medication-assisted recovery through coordination with behavioral/psychological counseling, embedded in the context of recovery-oriented systems of care.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Methadone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Primary Health Care , Humans
5.
Exp Hematol ; 30(9): 1051-60, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12225797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the megakaryocyte potential of normal bone marrow (NBM) CD34(+)CD133(+) cells, a subset offering a possible alternative for clinical CD34 immunoselection, we evaluated their colony-forming unit megakaryocyte (CFU-Mk) content and their ability to produce clonogenic Mk progenitors in comparison with the CD133(-) subset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sorted NBM CD34(+)CD133(+) and CD34(+)CD133(-) subsets were evaluated for Mk clonogenic capacity before and after in vitro proliferation in serum-free liquid culture containing kit ligand, Flt3 ligand, thrombopoietin, interleukin-3, and interleukin-6. The segregation of CFU-Mk according to the expression of CD34, CD133, and CD41 was compared between fresh BM cells and expanded cells. RESULTS: Although the fresh NBM CD133(-)CD34(+) subset included two thirds CFU-Mk, only the CD133(+) subset contained primitive cells able to produce all categories of CFU-Mk in vitro. Immunophenotyping confirmed that CD41 antigen is nonspecific for Mk lineage and showed that the usual CD34(+)CD41(+) subset does not specifically define a CFU-Mk population. The segregation of CFU-Mk before and after expansion according to CD34, CD41, or CD133 was modified in relation with down-regulation of CD34 and CD133 antigens and up-regulation of CD41 antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The NBM CD133(+) subset contains primitive cells able to generate CFU-Mk, a subset probably relevant to platelet recovery after infusion. The alteration of antigen expression during in vitro proliferation calls for caution in the identification of the different categories of Mk subsets produced and in the assessment of their predictivity for in vivo platelet production.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Cells/cytology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Megakaryocytes/cytology , AC133 Antigen , Antigens, CD , Antigens, CD34/analysis , Cell Differentiation , Cell Lineage , Cell Separation , Cells, Cultured/cytology , Colony-Forming Units Assay , Culture Media, Serum-Free , Erythroid Precursor Cells/cytology , Glycoproteins/analysis , Granulocytes/cytology , Humans , Megakaryocytes/classification , Peptides/analysis , Platelet Membrane Glycoprotein IIb/analysis
6.
Sante Ment Que ; 12(1): 153-156, 1987.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16946978
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...