Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis Does Not Compromise Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR) with concomitant biceps tenodesis with those who underwent an isolated RCR. METHODS: Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery, irreparable rotator cuff tears, rotator cuff arthropathy, calcific tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis requiring a capsular release, or advanced osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Patients were indicated for biceps tenodesis if they had any degree of tendon tearing, moderate-to-severe tenosynovitis, instability, or a significant degenerative SLAP tear. Primary outcome measures included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level visual analog scale, EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level, and a site-specific questionnaire, which focused on surgical expectations, satisfaction, and complications. Multivariate analysis of variance to analyze descriptive statistics and determine significant differences between the patient groups for subjective and objective outcome measures were performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences for pain/visual analog scale (0.34 ± 0.09 vs 0.47 ± 0.09, P = .31), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (96.69 ± 0.87 vs 94.44 ± 0.91, P = .07), and Simple Shoulder Test (11.42 ± 0.17 vs 10.95 ± 0.18, P = .06) between the RCR with concomitant biceps tenodesis and isolated RCR at a minimum of 2 years' postoperatively. This is despite the RCR with concomitant biceps tenodesis group having significantly larger rotator cuff tears (4.25 ± 0.30 cm2 vs 2.80 ± 0.32 cm2, P = .001) than the isolated RCR group. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that concomitant biceps tenodesis does not compromise outcomes when compared with an isolated RCR at 2-year follow-up, despite this group having larger rotator cuff tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case study.

Femoral Fixation Strength as a Function of Bone Plug Length in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Interference Screws.

PURPOSE: To determine femoral construct fixation strength as bone plug length decreases in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Sixty fresh-frozen bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts were utilized and divided into 20-, 15-, and 10-mm length bone plug groups, subdivided further so that half utilized the patella side (P) for testing and half used the tibial side (T). Ten mm diameter recipient tunnels were created within the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament footprint of 60 cadaveric femurs. All bone plugs were 10 mm in diameter; grafts were fixed using a 7 × 23 mm metal interference screw. An Instron was used to determine the load to failure of each group. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to test the hypothesis that there would be one or more mean differences in fixation stability between 20- or 15-mm plug lengths (P or T) versus 10 mm T plug lengths when cross-compared, with no association between other P or T subgroups. RESULTS: The mean load to failure of the 20 mm plugs (20 P + T) was 457 ± 66N, 15 mm plugs (15 P + T) was 437 ± 74N, and 10 mm plugs (10 P + T) was 407 ± 107N. There was no significant difference between P + T groups: 20-versus 15-mm (p = 1.000), 15-versus 10-mm (p = 0.798), and 20-versus 10-mm (p = 0.200); P + T MANOVA (p = 0.291). Within groups, there was no significant difference between patella and tibial bone plug subgroups with a pullout force range between 469 ± 56N and 374 ± 116N and p-value ranging from p = 1.000 for longer bone plugs to p = 0.194 for shorter bone plugs; P versus T MANOVA (p = 0.113). CONCLUSION: In this human time zero cadaver model, there was no significant difference in construct failure between 20-,15-, and 10-mm bone plugs when fixed with an interference screw within the femoral tunnel, although fixation strength did trend down when from 20- to 15- to 10-mm bone plugs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is a balance between optimal bone plug length on the femoral side for achieving adequate fixation as well as minimizing donor site morbidity and facilitating graft passage in ACLR. This study reveals utilizing shorter plugs with interference screw fixation is potentially acceptable on the femoral side if shorter plugs are harvested.

Clinical Outcomes of Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Fast-Setting Bone Graft Substitute.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be achieved in a single-stage or two-stage approach. Single-stage revisions have several advantages, including one less operation, decreased cost, and a quicker recovery for patients. Revision ACLR can be complicated by malpositioned or dilated bone tunnels, which makes a single-stage revision more challenging or sometimes necessitates a two-stage approach. The use of fast-setting bone graft substitutes (BGS) has been described in recent literature as a strategy to potentially help address this problem in the setting of single-stage revision ACLR. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone single-stage revision ACLR using fast-setting BGS to address prior malpositioned or dilated tunnels. A retrospective review was conducted of the first nine consecutive patients who had undergone single-stage revision ACLR using a fast-setting BGS by a single surgeon between May 2017 and February 2020 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient-reported clinical outcomes, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, patient satisfaction questions, and the need for additional surgery were evaluated for this group between 26 and 49 months postoperative. Of the nine patients eligible for inclusion, eight patients (88.9%) were evaluated, and one was lost to follow-up. At an average follow-up of 37.9 months (range: 27.8-55.7), the mean postoperative IKDC score was 75.0 ± 11.3, and the mean postoperative Tegner Lysholm Knee Score was 83.0 ± 17.6. None of the patients required additional revision surgery or experienced construct failure at the time of follow-up. Seven of eight respondents (87.5%) had their preoperative expectations met with the surgery, and 100% of patients stated they would have the surgery again. Single-stage revision ACLR using fast-setting BGS showed overall positive clinical outcomes for this pilot group of patients at a minimum 2-year follow-up. In select revision scenarios, these materials may be a valuable option to allow the filling of defects without compromising fixation or clinical outcomes.

A modified Delphi consensus statement on patellar instability: part I.

Aims: The aim of this study was to establish consensus statements on the diagnosis, nonoperative management, and indications, if any, for medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) repair in patients with patellar instability, using the modified Delphi approach. Methods: A total of 60 surgeons from 11 countries were invited to develop consensus statements based on their expertise in this area. They were assigned to one of seven working groups defined by subtopics of interest within patellar instability. Consensus was defined as achieving between 80% and 89% agreement, strong consensus was defined as between 90% and 99% agreement, and 100% agreement was considered to be unanimous. Results: Of 27 questions and statements on patellar instability, three achieved unanimous consensus, 14 achieved strong consensus, five achieved consensus, and five did not achieve consensus. Conclusion: The statements that reached unanimous consensus were that an assessment of physeal status is critical for paediatric patients with patellar instability. There was also unanimous consensus on early mobilization and resistance training following nonoperative management once there is no apprehension. The statements that did not achieve consensus were on the importance of immobilization of the knee, the use of orthobiologics in nonoperative management, the indications for MPFC repair, and whether a vastus medialis oblique advancement should be performed.

Subscapularis Tendon Tears: How Best to Approach This Issue.

Subscapularis tears, either in combination with more extensive rotator cuff pathology or in isolation, are a relatively common cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction which often requires surgical intervention. Similar to the general treatment of most rotator cuff tears, patients may respond to conservative treatment and not require surgical intervention, especially in the elderly or those with partial tears. However, many subscapularis tears require intervention to address complaints of pain, dysfunction, or both. The spectrum of subscapularis tears ranges from low-grade partial requiring simple debridement to full-thickness tears which have become retracted and irreparable necessitating complex repair. Although open repair had been performed with success, most subscapularis repairs can be accomplished with arthroscopic techniques.

A modified Delphi consensus statement on patellar instability: part II.

Aims: The aim of this study was to establish consensus statements on medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty, and rehabilitation and return to sporting activity in patients with patellar instability, using the modified Delphi process. Methods: This was the second part of a study dealing with these aspects of management in these patients. As in part I, a total of 60 surgeons from 11 countries contributed to the development of consensus statements based on their expertise in this area. They were assigned to one of seven working groups defined by subtopics of interest. Consensus was defined as achieving between 80% and 89% agreement, strong consensus was defined as between 90% and 99% agreement, and 100% agreement was considered unanimous. Results: Of 41 questions and statements on patellar instability, none achieved unanimous consensus, 19 achieved strong consensus, 15 achieved consensus, and seven did not achieve consensus. Conclusion: Most statements reached some degree of consensus, without any achieving unanimous consensus. There was no consensus on the use of anchors in MPFL reconstruction, and the order of fixation of the graft (patella first versus femur first). There was also no consensus on the indications for trochleoplasty or its effect on the viability of the cartilage after elevation of the osteochondral flap. There was also no consensus on postoperative immobilization or weightbearing, or whether paediatric patients should avoid an early return to sport.

Mild Biceps Tendonitis May Be Managed Nonoperatively During Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to determine whether patients with mild biceps tendonitis required revision surgery after the biceps tendon was not surgically treated, while addressing concomitant pathology, and to evaluate whether preoperative groove pain affected patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between 2015 and 2018 by a single surgeon for rotator cuff pathology, debridement, and distal clavicular excision (DCE), with or without subacromial decompression (SAD), and where the biceps tendon was not surgically addressed were retrospectively identified. Inclusion criteria were mild LS (<50% hyperemic appearing biceps tendon arthroscopically), and a minimum 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, simple shoulder test (SST), pain level, and satisfaction scores. Two sample t-tests compared postoperative patient-reported outcomes based on the presence or absence of preoperative bicipital groove tenderness. Results: Sixty-four of 69 eligible subjects (93%) were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. One out of 64 subjects underwent revision to perform a biceps tenodesis. Overall, patients had high patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively. Ninety-seven percent of patients reported they would have the surgery again. The presence of preoperative bicipital groove tenderness had no effect on ASES (P = .62), SST (P = .83) scores, and postoperative pain (P = .65). Patients without bicipital groove pain had average respective ASES and SST scores of 93.70 ± 11.84 and 10.66 ± 2.47; those with bicipital groove pain averaged 92.00 ± 15.31 and 10.78 ± 1.87. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction scores between patients with groove pain (9.42 ± 1.40) and those without (9.46 ± 1.38; P = .92). Conclusions: Patients with mild biceps tendonitis showed favorable outcomes with low revision rates and high patient satisfaction when the biceps tendon was not surgically addressed when the primary shoulder pathology was treated during arthroscopy, independent of preoperative groove pain. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Portal Closure After Segmental Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability.

Posterior instability, although an uncommon shoulder pathology, is reported most frequently in the athletic population. Arthroscopic repair has emerged as the main surgical treatment modality for posterior instability. However, when compared with arthroscopic repair for anterior instability, the results of this procedure remain suboptimal. The creation of iatrogenic defects in the capsule, due to cannula placement, is a possible culprit. Because these defects typically do not heal satisfactorily, they become stress risers within the capsule itself, which may lead to recurrent instability or an otherwise compromised repair construct. Therefore, we find that routine intraoperative repair of these defects after repair can reduce the risk of injury and possibly improve long-term outcomes. In this article, we illustrate the repair of a posterior segmental tear using all-suture knotless implants with closure of the posterior and posterior-inferior portals after stabilization.

Augmentation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Biologics and Grafts.

Arthroscopic augmentation of massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears proves to be a valid and evidence-based treatment option to maximize healing and patient outcomes following rotator cuff repair. Integration of acellular dermal allografts as augment or interposition grafts demonstrates definitive benefit in patients with high risk of retear or individuals with severely retracted tears, respectively. Furthermore, these allografts have demonstrated benefit when used for superior capsular repair for chronic, atrophied tears in young, active patients who do not want to proceed with a reverse total shoulder replacement.

The Number of Surgeons Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Repair Is Declining.

Purpose: To investigate surgeon preferences for graft use, including biologic augmentation and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) associated with surgical treatment of rotator cuff repair (RCR). Methods: A 26-question survey was completed by arthroscopic shoulder surgeons. Surgeon demographics were evaluated. Surgeons were queried about shoulder arthroscopic graft use and rationale then responses were analyzed based on demographics. Results: In total, 260 surgeons completed the survey. Fifty-one percent of surgeons reported a decrease in the volume of SCR use in the past 5 years. Less than 3% of surgeons used SCR in >90% of irreparable RCR cases, compared with 38% using SCR in <10% of irreparable cases (P < .05). Surgeons performing >100 RCR annually (42%; P < .05) and those employed in the hospital setting (44%; P < .05) reported an overall increase in the use of SCR. More international surgeons (67%) decreased their use of SCR compared with U.S. surgeons (44%; P < .05). In contrast, bioinductive graft use is generally on the rise, with 48% of surgeons reporting increased use since first use, although used in <10% of cases by 54% of surgeons. Sixty-eight percent of surgeons performing >100 RCRs annually used bioinductive grafts (P < .05). Fewer international surgeons (30%) performed biologic augmentation (P < .05). Suboptimal published outcomes (40%) and no perceived patient benefit (40%) were most cited for decreased SCR use. Surgeons reporting increased use cited improved personal patient outcomes (72%). Conclusions: Arthroscopic surgeons report decrease in volume of SCR use in the past 5 years. Surgeon's personal experience of patient outcome and suboptimal published results were the strongest factors impacting decision-making. In contrast, bioinductive graft use is increasing. However, most surgeons use these grafts in a relatively small percentage of cases. Clinical Relevance: Evaluation of scientific data, personal experience, and influences on surgical practice will give a comprehensive understanding of current RCR practices.

Optimizing Anchor Placement for Cone-Shaped Rotator Cuff Tears.

There are various technique preferences when performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Currently, most surgeons address all intra-articular pathology as well as assess the extent of a rotator cuff tear with the arthroscope in the joint prior to moving to the subacromial space, where they will initiate footprint preparation, anchor placement, and rotator cuff repair. Although this technique often yields good or at least acceptable visualization of the footprint, it does not always provide an optimal view of the medial footprint even when using a "50-yard line view" from a lateral portal. This can particularly be an issue with "cone-shaped" supraspinatus tears in which a smaller full-thickness bursal-sided tear often expands to a much larger articular-sided component. When surgeons are visualizing with the scope in the subacromial space, it is much more difficult to obtain a full appreciation of the extent of the articular-sided tear as well as optimal visualization of the medial footprint right up to the articular margin for both bone preparation and anchor placement. This article describes the benefit of keeping the arthroscope in the joint to facilitate footprint preparation and medial-row suture anchor placement prior to going to the subacromial space. This small technical modification can often offer surgeons far superior visualization of the entire greater tuberosity footprint especially when encountering a cone-shaped tear or high-grade articular-sided tear that requires repair. To further enhance viewing of the footprint with the scope intra-articularly, proficiency in using a 70° scope directed laterally will typically allow surgeons the most ideal view achievable. Once anchors are placed into the medial row, the arthroscope is inserted into the subacromial space to complete the repair.

Arthroscopic Biologic Interpositional Tuberosity Graft for the Treatment of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger, more active patients present a unique treatment challenge to shoulder surgeons. In the past few years, new techniques continue to emerge to address this challenging problem. The superior capsular reconstruction technique has been accepted as an option for addressing this problem. While initial results are encouraging, pitfalls remain regarding technical challenges, healing and protracted rehabilitation due to delayed motion protocols. We present an alternative approach to the massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears using a biologic interpositional humeral -based graft.

Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fast-Setting Bone Graft Substitutes.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions can be performed using either a single-stage or 2-stage technique. There are several benefits to using a single-stage approach when technically possible. Although not always feasible, eliminating the necessity of a 2-stage approach for certain indications is clearly preferable because it requires fewer operative procedures, leads to a more rapid recovery, and is cost effective. Here, we describe the use of fast-setting bone graft substitutes in the setting of single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The authors have found this technique useful in converting what would sometimes otherwise be approached using 2 stages into a single-stage procedure.

Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are surgical treatments for pathology of the proximal tendon of the long head of the biceps. There is debate over which procedure provides better patient outcomes. PURPOSE: Compare patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction between biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing arthroscopic biceps tenodesis or tenotomy as part of more extensive shoulder surgery with a single surgeon. Concomitant procedures included rotator cuff repair, subacromial decompression, acromioclavicular joint resection, and debridement. Patients 36-81 years old were contacted by phone at > 2-year post-operatively to complete a biceps-specific outcome questionnaire. Subject decision not to participate was the sole exclusion criterion. Satisfaction scores and frequencies of potential biceps-related downsides (biceps cramping/spasms, biceps pain, shoulder pain, weakness, cosmetic deformity) were analyzed for the effects of procedure, sex, and age. RESULTS: Satisfaction score distributions were similar between patients with tenodesis and patients with tenotomy (χ2 = 8.34, P = 0.08), although slightly more patients with tenodesis than patients with tenotomy reported being satisfied or very satisfied (96% versus 91%). Perceived downsides occurred more frequently among patients with tenotomy than in patients with tenodesis: 59% of patients with tenotomy reported ≥ 1 downside, versus 37% of patients with tenodesis (P < 0.01). In patients reporting ≥ 1 downside, distributions of total downsides differed between procedures (χ2 = 10.04, P = 0.04): patients with tenotomy were more likely to report multiple concurrent downsides than were patients with tenodesis (31% versus 16%). Each individual downside tended to be reported as present by a greater proportion of patients with tenotomy than patients with tenodesis. Sex had no effect on satisfaction or downsides, but there was a trend for older patients to report higher satisfaction and fewer downsides. CONCLUSIONS: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are both viable treatments for proximal biceps tendon pathology, yielding high patient satisfaction. There were trends toward greater satisfaction and fewer problems in patients with tenodesis. Still, younger patients with tenodesis did report perceived downsides. Alternatively, older patients tended to be more satisfied with both procedures overall. Regardless of procedure, most patients receiving either tenotomy or tenodesis would undergo their respective surgery again. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III evidence, retrospective comparative cohort study.

Gender Disparity between Donor Sites of the Trochlea Used for Autologous Osteoarticular Transfer: An MRI Analysis.

The purpose of this study was to assess potential gender differences in size of the lateral and medial trochlea of the male and female knee as well as the variation within gender of potential osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) donor site area. Two hundred and twelve skeletally mature patients, 106 males and 106 females, who underwent a 3T magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for a variety of indications were utilized for analysis. Exclusion criteria included degenerative arthritis, trochlear dysplasia, and poor image quality. Medial and lateral femoral trochlear cartilage width was obtained using a linear radiologic measurement tool. Widths were measured from a reproducible anatomic location representing the maximal trochlear dimension in a region where donor plugs are commonly harvested. Trochlear width was also plotted as a function of patient height. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. The mean and standard deviation of the lateral trochlear cartilage width (mm) for males and females were 23.38 +/- 2.14 and 20.44 +/- 2.16, respectively (p < 0.00001). The mean and standard deviation of the medial trochlear cartilage width (mm) for males and females were 14.16 +/- 2.17 and 11.78 +/- 2.03, respectively (p < 0.00001). The overall range in trochlear width for both the lateral and medial sides was 22.22 and 19.73 mm for males and females, respectively. A graft measuring 10 mm could represent as little as 34% of the lateral trochlea in males versus as much as 65% in females. Our results indicate that donor OAT plug diameter relative to available trochlear cartilage width will vary significantly both between genders and individual patients. Trochlear width variability and its potential implications on donor site morbidity may be an important consideration when contemplating osteochondral plug harvest for OAT or other indications. The level of evidence is IV.

A Case Series of Successful Repair of Articular Cartilage Fragments in the Knee.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether chondral fragments without bone have the potential to heal after fixation. Controversy exists and opinions differ regarding the optimal treatment of chondral defects after pure chondral fracture. PURPOSE: To determine clinical and radiographic outcomes after internal fixation of traumatic chondral fragments repaired to bone in the knee. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 10 male patients with a mean age of 14.6 years (range, 10-25 years) at the time of surgery was performed. Eight of 10 patients were skeletally immature. Patients were selected by operating surgeons per the presence of a large displaced pure chondral fragment on magnetic resonance imaging and confirmed on intraoperative inspection. All patients had a diagnosed traumatic displaced pure chondral fracture of the knee (without bone) and underwent internal fixation with minimum 1-year follow-up. Validated patient-reported and surgeon-measured outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively. All patients were evaluated at a mean 56 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At surgery, the mean defect size that was primarily repaired with the displaced chondral fragment was 1.9 × 2.0 cm. With minimum 1-year follow-up, there were no clinical failures. All 8 patients who had subsequent magnetic resonance imaging follow-up had radiographic evidence of complete healing of the chondral fragment back to bone. At a mean follow-up of 56 months (range, 13-171 months; median, 36 months), patients had a mean International Knee Documentation Committee score of 94.74 (range, 87.4-100), a mean Marx Activity Scale score of 14.4 (range, 8-16), and a mean Tegner Activity Scale score of 7 (range, 5-9). At final follow-up, all patients except 1 returned to sports. CONCLUSION: The treatment of large traumatic chondral fragments is controversial. In this select series of 10 young patients who underwent primary repair with internal fixation, there were no failures clinically. Patients demonstrated excellent short-term clinical and radiographic results after fixation of these relatively large chondral fragments in the knee.

Arthroscopic Resection of Symptomatic Bennett Lesions.

Bennett lesions, also known as "thrower's exostosis" of the shoulder, involve ossification of the posteroinferior glenoid and are not uncommon in overhead throwing athletes. The literature surrounding the optimal operative management of the symptomatic Bennett lesion is limited. The purpose of this article is to describe the arthroscopic surgical technique for the visualization and excision of the symptomatic extra-articular pathologic ossification involving the posteroinferior glenoid. Because many surgeons may not be familiar with this problem or procedure, we present a straightforward method that allows for identification and excision of the exostosis through an arthroscopic posterior arthrotomy.

Management of Injuries to the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Review.

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is thought to be the most important medial structure providing restraint to lateral subluxation of the patella. After an initial patellar dislocation, the MPFL is frequently injured and can usually be treated with conservative measures. However, these patients often suffer from recurrent dislocations, which thereby necessitate operative intervention. In the setting of normal anatomy and kinematics, isolated reconstruction of the MPFL is an effective treatment for preventing recurrent dislocations. Various surgical techniques have been described, with differences in fixation and graft selection. The treatment of MPFL injuries should aim to provide patellar stabilization and restore normal kinematics throughout the joint. This review will discuss the following: (1) anatomy of the MPFL, (2) presentation and assessment of MPFL injuries, (3) management of patients with MPFL injuries, and (4) complications following MPFL reconstruction.

Patient Satisfaction After Biceps Tenotomy.

BACKGROUND: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are frequently performed for proximal biceps lesions; however, there continues to be debate as to which method is superior. This study examined patient-reported outcomes after biceps tenotomy. HYPOTHESIS: Biceps tenotomy in the setting of concomitant shoulder pathology is a reasonable option with high satisfaction rates and a low incidence of pain and cramping in middle-aged to older individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 104 patients (mean age, 63.5 years; range, 40-81 years) were evaluated at the time of surgery and at a mean follow-up of 38.4 months (range, 22-57 months). Biceps tenotomy was performed as a component of more extensive shoulder surgery in all patients. Patient satisfaction, frequency of cramping and spasms, biceps pain, weakness, and cosmetic deformity were evaluated at over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome, and 95% would have their surgery again. Three patients who reported being unsatisfied or very unsatisfied had either advanced glenohumeral arthritis or an irreparable rotator cuff tear. Cosmetic deformity occurred in 13% of patients. Twenty percent reported spasms and cramping in their biceps, and 19% reported some biceps pain; however, frequency of spasms and cramping was typically once weekly, and biceps pain was reported as severe or very severe in only 2 patients. Subjective biceps weakness was reported in 17% of patients. Age had no effect on outcome measures, and female sex was associated with less limitation and greater satisfaction after tenotomy compared with men. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that patient-reported downsides to biceps tenotomy were usually mild and/or infrequent and did not affect patient satisfaction. We conclude that biceps tenotomy is a viable option that can lead to a high rate of patient satisfaction and outcomes in middle-aged to older individuals undergoing shoulder surgery with biceps pathology.