Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Educ Perspect ; 41(5): 309-311, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32826688

ABSTRACT

The Northeast Team of the Ohio Action Coalition, composed of regional clinical and academic educators, identified a potential barrier for nurses pursuing a baccalaureate degree. Duplication of health assessment content was identified for some associate degree graduates enrolled in RN-BSN programs, thereby adding extra time and cost for attaining the baccalaureate degree. In response, the Northeast Team of the Ohio Action Coalition developed an assessment competency evaluation that, if successfully passed, would grant credit for the health assessment course. The assessment competency evaluation provided the opportunity for students to demonstrate competency in both health assessment and clinical judgment skills.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Clinical Competence , Humans , Judgment , Ohio
2.
Nurs Forum ; 55(4): 754-762, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767419

ABSTRACT

There is a critical need for nurse educators to promote civility in nursing practice using systems thinking to promote quality and safety and improve patient outcomes by preventing undue patient harm. In this article, evidence is synthesized in order that readers can recognize, respond and manage workplace incivility. Systems thinking is introduced as a best practice solution for advancing a civil workplace culture. The author-created Systems Awareness Model, adapted for civility awareness, guides nurse educators with evidence-based strategies for teaching nurses the essential skills to promoting a civility culture within health systems. The strategies can be used by nurse educators in practice to interface workplace application. Proposed examples of evaluation methods are aligned with the teaching strategies. The purpose of this article is to provide nurse educators in practice with evidence-based teaching strategies and evaluation methods to address incivility in health care using a systems thinking perspective.


Subject(s)
Faculty, Nursing/education , Incivility/prevention & control , Nursing/standards , Systems Analysis , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/standards , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/trends , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Faculty, Nursing/psychology , Faculty, Nursing/standards , Humans , Nursing/methods , Nursing/trends
3.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 50(9): 392-397, 2019 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31437294

ABSTRACT

There is an urgent need to improve the use and usability of the electronic health record (EHR) in health care to prevent undue patient harm. Professional development educators can use systems thinking and the QSEN competency, Informatics, to educate nurses about such things as nurse-sensitive indicators in preventing medical errors. This article presents teaching tips in using systems thinking to champion communication technologies that support error prevention (betterment). [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2019;50(9):392-397.].


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Continuing , Electronic Health Records , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Medical Informatics/education , Systems Analysis , Humans , Leadership , Quality of Health Care
4.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 33(3): 128-135, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30946110

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized rubric for systems thinking across transitions of care for clinical nurse specialists. DESIGN: The design was a mixed-methods study using the Systems Awareness Model as a framework for bridging theory to practice. METHODS: Content validity was determined using a content validity index. Reliability was established using statistical analysis with Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient. Usability of the rubric was established using content analysis from focus group discussions about their experiences in using the rubric. RESULTS: Content validity was established with a content validity ratio of 1.0. Statistical analysis showed a high interrater reliability (α = 0.99), and sections of the rubric showed a strong degree of reliability with α's ranging from 0.88 to 1.00. Content analysis revealed several overall themes for usability of the rubric: clarity, objectivity, and detail. The area for improvement included adding more detail in the scholarly writing section. CONCLUSION: The research team recommends using the rubric to reflect application of systems thinking across transitions of care.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Nurse Clinicians/education , Systems Analysis , Transitional Care , Focus Groups , Humans , Models, Statistical , Nursing Education Research , Nursing Evaluation Research , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...