Impact of simulation-based prenatal invasive procedure training on professional practice, a preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling remain the cornerstone of prenatal diagnosis. These procedures are associated with a risk of miscarriage estimated at approximately 0.5 %. Our team has developed a training model for performing simulation-based prenatal invasive procedures. Several simulation sessions are offered each year to obstetricians-gynecologists involved in fetal medicine in France and abroad. This simulation-based learning has already been conclusively evaluated according to levels I and II of the Kirkpatrick model. Here, we carried out a preliminary study according to level III: does participation in training in prenatal invasive procedures through simulation have an influence on professional practice? METHODS: An anonymous online survey was sent to 82 obstetricians-gynecologists who participated in the training in prenatal invasive procedures at the Antoine Béclère maternity hospital between January 1st, 2014 and December 31, 2018. This questionnaire, entitled "Evaluation of the professional impact of training in invasive procedures through simulation", included 20 quantitative and qualitative items. RESULTS: 48 (59 %) obstetricians-gynecologists responded to the questionnaire. 98 % of the participants considered that participation in the training had a significant impact on their professional practice. Half considered this impact to be major. 60 % of the former participants are now attached to a Multidisciplinary Center for Prenatal Diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Participation in training is considered by former participants to have a significant impact on their professional practice. In order to finalize the evaluation of this learning, a study of the benefits for patients and their pregnancy should be discussed.

Two separate placental masses on ultrasound do not always indicate a dichorionic pregnancy.

Monochorionic pregnancies are associated with a higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality than dichorionic pregnancies. Early determination of chorionicity by an ultrasound exam between 11+0 and 14+0 weeks' gestation (WG) is essential for the subsequent management of twin pregnancies. The presence of the T-sign is the most specific sign for determination of monochorionicity. During the second trimester, the presence of two distinct placental masses has a lower specificity in determining the chorionicity. We report here two cases of a monochorionic pregnancy with a bipartite placenta, suggesting that a placenta with two separate masses, each with a distinct cord insertion is not always indicative of a dichorionic pregnancy.'

Down syndrome maternal serum markers in oocyte donation and other assisted reproductive technologies.

OBJECTIVE: Because maternal serum markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, human chorionic gonadotropin free ß subunit, and alpha-fetoprotein) used for Down syndrome (DS) screening have been described as predictors of obstetrical complications and because assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies are known to be at increased risk for obstetrical complications, it is unclear whether or not correction factors should be applied to the calculated risk of DS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate DS maternal serum markers in oocyte donation (OD) and ART pregnancies in comparison with natural pregnancies. METHOD: Multicenter retrospective 2010 to 2013 study in singleton pregnancies was used. First- and second-trimester DS screenings in 614 OD and 1921 ART pregnancies versus 7268 natural pregnancies are compared. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in hCGß in the OD group for both trimesters (first trimester: 1.28 MoM vs 1.02; P < .001 and second trimester: 1.32 MoM vs 1 MoM; P < .001). Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A was significantly lower in the ART group (0.92 and 1.02 MoM P < .001). CONCLUSION: Maternal serum markers for DS screening are significantly modified in ART and OD pregnancies. Because these markers are also markers for obstetrical complications, the rationale for applying correction factors is questionable.

Case of a healthy infant born following antenatal enterovirus myocarditis and hydrops.

Fetal hydrops and myocarditis were diagnosed in a woman at 32 weeks of gestation (WG). Transplacental enterovirus infection was suspected because all other causes of myocarditis and hydrops were excluded, it was during an endemic period, and there was a setting of maternal infection (fever a few days before). We opted for in utero treatment because of the risk of resuscitating a neonate with myocarditis and hydrops. We administered dexamethasone 12mg twice for pulmonary maturation and presumed it would partially improve the myocarditis. Fetal arrhythmia was noted at 35 WG and we decided to deliver the infant as postnatal treatment of the heart disorder would be more effective. RT-PCR (ARGENE(®)) showed that the neonate's throat and anal tissues and cord blood sampled on the day of birth contained enterovirus ribonucleic acid and coxsackievirus B5, as did the mother's anal sample. Laboratory tests, heart MRI and probably brain MRI indicated neonatal enterovirus infection. Findings were normal at two-year follow-up.