Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 12(16): 2569-73, 2006 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16688803

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the diagnostic value of the rabeprazole test in patients seen by general practitioners. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were enrolled by general practitioners in this multi-centre, randomized and double-blind study. All patients received either rabeprazole (20 mg bid) or a placebo for one week. The diagnosis of GERD was established on the presence of mucosal breaks at endoscopy and/or an abnormal esophageal 24-h pH test. The test was considered to be positive if patients reported at least a "clear improvement" of symptoms on a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the test for rabeprazole and the placebo were 83% and 40%, respectively. The corresponding specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 45% and 67%, 71% and 71%, and 62% and 35%, respectively. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis confirmed that the best discriminatory cut-off corresponded to description of "clear improvement". CONCLUSION: The poor specificity of the proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) test does not support such an approach to establish a diagnosis of GERD in a primary care setting.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents , Benzimidazoles , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Omeprazole/analogs & derivatives , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles , Adult , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/adverse effects , Physicians, Family , Rabeprazole , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...