Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(7): 1140-1150, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30153766

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To establish the best timing for the realization of first-trimester-morphologic-evaluation, following routine midtrimester fetal-ultrasound-scan-recommendations (RFUSR), by performing exclusive transabdominal exploration, and to determine the sensitivity of the mentioned scan for diagnosis of major structural abnormalities.Method: Prospective observational study with 512 pregnant women with singleton gestations (438 low-risk, 74 high-risk) was conducted. Early fetal morphological evaluation (EFME) is performed in line with RFUSR (18-22 weeks) (ISUOG 2010) and a check-list structured evaluation was followed, between 11-13 + 6 weeks. Its performance is assessed in the correct identification of normal fetal anatomy, and its effectiveness in the detection of structural defectsResults: Five hundred and four pregnant women were evaluated, of which, 58.3% EFME are considered complete fetal anatomical surveys. Complete fetal anatomical surveys scans rise from 23.1% at 11-11 + 6 weeks to 63.8% at 13 + 3-13 weeks, with a clear turning point at 12 + 6-13 + 3 weeks (63.8%) (p < .05). From 12 + 6-13 + 3 weeks only renal (26.3%) and cardiac assessments (31.6%) present an inconclusive evaluation greater than 20%. Body mass index (23.9 versus 29.8) and estimated fetal weight (63 versus 86.7 g) influence EMFE's ability of identifying fetal structures (p < .05). EMFE presents sensitivity for the identification of structural malformations of 83.3% (20/24).Conclusions: From 12 + 6 weeks of gestation onwards, a complete fetal morphological evaluation can be performed in 63.8% of cases following the routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations (ISUOG's 20 weeks scan).


Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/statistics & numerical data
2.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 96(12): 1490-1497, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28889406

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound in the identification of complicated operative (vacuum or forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of nulliparous women with an indication for operative delivery who underwent intrapartum transperineal ultrasound before fetal extraction. Managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound data. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound was performed immediately before blade application, both at rest and concurrently with contractions and active pushing. Operative delivery was classified as complicated when one or more of the following situations occurred: three or more tractions; a third-/fourth-degree perineal tear; significant bleeding during the episiotomy repair; major tear or significant traumatic neonatal lesion. RESULTS: A total of 143 nulliparous women were included in the study (82 vacuum-assisted deliveries and 61 forceps-assisted deliveries), with 20 fetuses in occiput posterior position. Forty-seven operative deliveries were classified as complicated deliveries (28 vacuum-assisted deliveries, 19 forceps-assisted deliveries). No differences in obstetric, intrapartum or neonatal characteristics were observed between the study groups, with the following exceptions: birthweight (3229 ± 482 uncomplicated deliveries vs. 3623 ± 406 complicated deliveries; p < 0.003) and number of vacuum tractions (1.4 uncomplicated deliveries, 4.5 complicated deliveries; p < 0.0005). The strongest predictors of a complicated delivery, using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), were the angle of progression with active pushing (AoP2) (AUC 86.9%) and the progression distance with active pushing (PD2) (AUC 74.5%). The optimal cut-off value for predicting a difficult operative delivery was an AoP2 of 153.5° (sensitivity 95.2%; false-positive rate 5.9%) or PD2 of 58.5 mm (sensitivity 95.2%; false-positive rate 7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The sonographic parameters AoP2 and PD2 can be used to predict cases of complicated operative deliveries in nulliparous women.


Subject(s)
Obstetric Labor Complications/diagnostic imaging , Obstetrical Forceps/adverse effects , Ultrasonography/methods , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Labor Presentation , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...