Physician Awareness and Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Diagnosis of Vaginitis Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Vaginitis is one of the main causes of primary care and gynecological visits in the United States. The most common infectious causes are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis. A physician survey was conducted to measure awareness of vaginitis clinical guidelines and availability of in-office point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools. Participants were asked to perform a chart review to evaluate diagnostic practices for their symptomatic vaginitis patients. A total of 333 physicians and 984 patient charts were included. Physicians were most familiar with VVC and BV diagnostic guidelines; fewer than half were aware of current trichomoniasis guidelines. Although access to POC tools used to evaluate and diagnose vaginitis varied by practice, there was limited access to all 3 tools (microscope, pH test strips, potassium hydroxide solution) required to perform a full Amsel workup for BV (47% obstetricians/gynecologists vs. 32% primary care physicians, P < .05). Based on guidelines, 66% of patients evaluated for VVC, 45% of patients evaluated for BV, and 17% evaluated for trichomoniasis received an optimal workup. Among trichomoniasis positive patients, 75% received chlamydia/gonorrhea testing, 42% were tested for HIV, partner therapy was noted in 59% of cases, and 47% returned to be retested within 3 months. Limited awareness of recommended diagnostic practices and lack of access to POC tools contributed to broad guideline nonadherence. This study demonstrates that clinicians commonly fall short of current guidelines and suggests the need for lab-based assessments and appropriate insurance coverage to fill the present diagnostic void.

Asthma that is not well-controlled is associated with increased healthcare utilization and decreased quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Relationships of asthma control to other asthma outcomes have been incompletely documented. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQL) and subsequent healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: A 1-year online prospective longitudinal survey was conducted in 497 adults and 170 children with asthma treated in the past year. Control was measured by Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) and Childhood ACT™ (C-ACT)™ scores dichotomized into "well-controlled" (scores >19) or "not well-controlled" (scores ≤19), and HRQL was measured using the PedsQL™ 3.0 Asthma Module (children) and the SF-12 Health Survey (adults). Multivariate models were used for analysis. RESULTS: HRQL scores were significantly lower for adults (mean decrease 3.4) and children (mean decrease 12.8) whose asthma was not well-controlled compared to patients with well-controlled asthma. Adults with asthma that was not well-controlled at baseline had a threefold greater risk of an asthma-related doctor visit and a 10-fold greater risk of an emergency department (ED) visit for asthma in the subsequent 9 months (odds ratio (OR) = 3.3 and OR = 11.3, respectively). Children with asthma that was not well-controlled had a nearly fivefold increased risk for subsequent asthma-related doctors' and ED visits (OR = 4.8 and OR = 4.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both adults and children with not well-controlled asthma had significantly lower quality of life and were more likely to require an office or ED visit for asthma compared to patients with higher ACT scores. Therefore, it is important to continually assess asthma control and adjust controller therapy accordingly.